Standard Article

You have free access to this content

Standards, Environmental

Environmental Policy and Regulation

  1. Professor Vic Barnett,
  2. Marion Bown

Published Online: 15 SEP 2006

DOI: 10.1002/9780470057339.vas055

Encyclopedia of Environmetrics

Encyclopedia of Environmetrics

How to Cite

Barnett, V. and Bown, M. 2006. Standards, Environmental. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. 4.

Author Information

  1. Nottingham Trent University, UK

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 15 SEP 2006

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (15 JAN 2013)


  1. References
  • 1
    Andersen, M.E., Conolly, R.B., Faustman, E.M., Kavlock, R.J., Portier, C.J., Sheehan, D.M., Wier, P.J. & Ziese, L. (1999). Quantitative mechanistically based dose–response modelling with endocrine-active compounds, Environmental Health Perspectives 107, Supplement 4, 631638.
  • 2
    Barnett, V. & Moore, K. (1997). Best linear unbiased estimates in ranked-set sampling with particular reference to imperfect ordering, Journal of Applied Statistics 24, 697710.
  • 3
    Barnett, V. & O'Hagan, A. (1997). Setting Environmental Standards: The Statistical Approach to Handling Uncertainty and Variation, Chapman & Hall, London.
  • 4
    Becka, M. & Urfer, W. (1996). Statistical aspects of inhalation toxicokinetics, Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3, 5164.
  • 5
    Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) (1999). Radioactivity in the Food and Environment, 1998, CEFAS, Lowestoft.
  • 6
    Chen, S.Y., Ranek, N., Kamboj, S., Hensley, J. & Wallo, A. (1999). Authorised release of DOE's non-real property: process and approach, Health Physics 77, S40S48.
  • 7
    Chock, D.P., Winkler, S.L. & Pezda, S. (1997). Attainment flip-flops and the achievability of the ozone air quality standard, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 47, 620622.
  • 8
    Cox, L.H., Guttorp, P., Sampson, P.D., Caccia, D.C. & Thompson, M.L. (1999). A preliminary statistical examination of the effects of uncertainty and variability on environmental regulatory criteria for ozone, in Environmental Statistics: Analysing Data for Environmental Policy, G.R. Bock & J.A. Goode, eds, Novartis Symposium 220, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 122138.
  • 9
    Crump, K.S. (1984). A new method for determining allowable daily intakes, Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 4, 854871.
  • 10
    Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions UK (DETR) (1996). Indicators of Sustainable Development for the UK, HMSO, London.
  • 11
    Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions UK (DETR) (1998). Sustainability Counts, HMSO, London.
  • 12
    Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions UK (DETR) (1999). The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, HMSO, London.
  • 13
    Dominici, F., Samet, J.M. & Zeger, S.L. (2000). Combining evidence on air pollution and daily mortality from the 20 largest US cities: a hierarchical modelling strategy, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 163, 263284.
  • 14
    Faustman, E.M. & Bartell, S.M. (1997). Review of noncancer risk assessment: applications of benchmark dose methods, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 3, 893920.
  • 15
    Guttorp, P. (1999). Environmental Statistics, NRSCE Technical Report Series 32. At:
  • 16
    Haber, L.T., Allen, B.C. & Kimmel, C.A. (1998). Non-cancer risk assessment for nickel compounds: issues associated with dose–response modelling of inhalation and oral exposures, Toxicological Sciences 43, 213229.
  • 17
    Hill, R.A. & Hoover, S.M. (1997). Importance of dose–response model form in probabilistic assessment: a case study of health effects from methylmercury in fish, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 3, 465481.
  • 18
    Laslett, G. (2000). Composite sampling of contaminated sites: adjusting the environmental investigation limit using classical statistics, submitted.
  • 19
    Massman, W.J., Musselman, R.C. & Lefohn, A.S. (2000). A conceptual ozone dose–response model to develop a standard to protect vegetation, The Atmospheric Environment 34, 745759.
  • 20
    National Rivers Authority (NRA) UK (1994). Water Quality Objectives: Procedures used by the National Rivers Authority for the purpose of the Surface Waters (River Ecosystem) (Classification) Regulations 1994, NRA, Bristol.
  • 21
    New Zealand Ministry for the Environment (1998). Recreational Water Quality Guidelines. At:
  • 22
    Palmgren, F., Berkowicz, R., Ziv, A. & Hertel, O. (1999). Actual car fleet emissions estimated from urban air quality measurements and street pollution models, Science of the Total Environment 235, 101109.
  • 23
    Piegorsch, W.W. & Bailer, A.J. (1997). Statistics for Environmental Biology and Toxicology, Chapman & Hall, London.
  • 24
    Rai, S.N., Bartlett, S., Krewski, D. & Patterson, J. (2000). The use of probabilistic risk assessment in establishing drinking water objectives, submitted.
  • 25
    Rai, S.N. & Krewski, D. (1998). Uncertainty and variability analysis in multiplicative risk models, Risk Analysis 18, 3745.
  • 26
    Risk Assessment Forum (1995). The Use of the Benchmark Dose Approach in Health Risk Assessment, EPA/630/R-94/007, US Environment Protection Agency, Washington.
  • 27
    Standards Australia (1997). Guide to the Sampling and Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Soil. Part 1: Non-Volatile and Semi-Volatile Compounds, AS4482.1-1997. Standards Australia, New South Wales.
  • 28
    US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997). National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; Final Rule. At:
  • 29
    US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997). Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge. At:
  • 30
    US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. At:
  • 31
    US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Office of Enforcement) (1998). NRC Enforcement Manual, NUREG BR-0195, Revision 2. At:
  • 32
    Warn, A.E. (1999). Setting standards for new discharges to water supply rivers, personal communication.