Standard Article

Optimization Techniques for Damage Detection

  1. Keith Worden1,
  2. Wieslaw Staszewski1,
  3. Graeme Manson1,
  4. Aldo Ruotulo2,
  5. Cecilia Surace2

Published Online: 15 SEP 2009

DOI: 10.1002/9780470061626.shm057

Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring

Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring

How to Cite

Worden, K., Staszewski, W., Manson, G., Ruotulo, A. and Surace, C. 2009. Optimization Techniques for Damage Detection. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Sheffield, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sheffield, UK

  2. 2

    Politecnico di Torino, Department of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Torino, Italy

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 15 SEP 2009

This article is concerned with techniques for optimization problems in the context of structural health monitoring. Many techniques are available for solving various classes of problems, including the computationally demanding combinatorial optimization problems which arise in principled approaches to feature selection or sensor optimization. This article briefly describes the classical, gradient-based approaches that are well represented in the mathematical literature, and then goes on to discuss, in much more detail, the heuristic methods inspired by physics and biology, which have (comparatively) recently proved to be very powerful for combinatorial problems.

Keywords: optimization; combinatorial optimization; steepest descent; simulated annealing; genetic algorithms; differential evolution; ant colony metaphors; immune system metaphors; sensor placement; damage identification