Chapter 10. Response and Characterization of Confined Borosilicate Glass: Intact and Damaged
- Lisa Prokurat,
- Andrew Wereszczak,
- Edgar Lara-Curzio
Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470291368.ch10
Copyright © 2007 The American Ceramics Society
Book Title

Advances in Ceramic Armor II: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 27, Issue 7
Additional Information
How to Cite
Dannemann, K. A., Nicholls, A. E., Anderson, C. E., Chocron, S. and Walker, J. D. (2008) Response and Characterization of Confined Borosilicate Glass: Intact and Damaged, in Advances in Ceramic Armor II: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 27, Issue 7 (eds L. Prokurat, A. Wereszczak and E. Lara-Curzio), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470291368.ch10
Publication History
- Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
- Published Print: 1 JAN 2006
Book Series:
ISBN Information
Print ISBN: 9780470080573
Online ISBN: 9780470291368
- Summary
- Chapter
- References
Keywords:
- glass material;
- borosilicate glass;
- diagnostics;
- increasing compressive loads;
- ceramics
Summary
The objective of this work is to determine the fundamental compression response of borosilicate glass and obtain an improved understanding of the transition from intact to damaged material to aid in glass modeling efforts. Compression experiments were conducted on borosilicate glass under confinement. An experimental technique developed for ceramics1 is applied to glass specimens to obtain comminuted glass material by in-situ failure of intact or pre-damaged (by thermal shock) samples. Emphasis is on development of the experimental technique and application of additional diagnostics to characterize the response of comminuted glass. The glass samples (intact or pre-damaged) were inserted in a high-strength steel confining sleeve, and then loaded and re-loaded at quasistatic strain rates to fail the material in-situ. Multiple load/reload cycles were applied at successively increasing compressive loads. Strain gages mounted on the outer diameter of the confinement sleeve were used to measure hoop strain. Differences in the response of intact vs. pre-damaged glass material are evaluated and presented. Interpretation of the results within a constitutive model for borosilicate glass is presented in a companion paper by Chocron, et al.2
