Chapter 43. The Effect of Diameter Variation Along a Fiber on the Determination of Fiber Strengths and the Parameters of Their Distribution.
- Mrityunjay Singh,
- Todd Jessen
Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
Copyright © 2001 The American Ceramic Society
25th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 22, Issue 3
How to Cite
Lara-Curzio, E. and Garcia, D. (2008) The Effect of Diameter Variation Along a Fiber on the Determination of Fiber Strengths and the Parameters of Their Distribution., in 25th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 22, Issue 3 (eds M. Singh and T. Jessen), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470294680.ch43
- Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
- Published Print: 1 JAN 2001
Print ISBN: 9780470375730
Online ISBN: 9780470294680
The effect of variable fiber diameter among fibers in a bundle, and along the length of individual fibers, on the determination of individual fiber strength values and on the estimates of the parameters of the distribution of fiber strengths was investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. In this analysis it is assumed that the average fiber diameters in a bundle are distributed according to a known distribution (e.g. normal), that the diameter of a fiber varies randomly along its length, and that fiber strengths are distributed according to a two-parameter Weibull distribution. It is shown that the magnitude of the error that is incurred in the determination of a fiber strength, when the fiber diameter is measured at a location that doesn't coincide with the fracture plane, increases with the magnitude of the variability of diameter along the fiber length. Similarly, the error in the determination of the Weibull modulus, for example, increases with the variability of average fiber diameters in a bundle when fiber strengths are calculated using the average of the cross-sectional area of the fibers in the bundle. The implications of these findings on the development of a standardized test method for the tensile evaluation of single fibers are discussed.