Chapter 44. C-Coupon Studies of SiC/SiC Composites Part I: Acoustic Emission Monitoring
- Hua-Tay Lin,
- Mrityunjay Singh
Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470294741.ch44
Copyright © 2002 The American Ceramic Society
Book Title

26th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 23, Issue 3
Additional Information
How to Cite
Morscher, G. N., Hurwitz, F. I. and Calomino, A. M. (2008) C-Coupon Studies of SiC/SiC Composites Part I: Acoustic Emission Monitoring, in 26th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 23, Issue 3 (eds H.-T. Lin and M. Singh), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470294741.ch44
Publication History
- Published Online: 26 MAR 2008
- Published Print: 1 JAN 2002
Book Series:
ISBN Information
Print ISBN: 9780470375785
Online ISBN: 9780470294741
- Summary
- Chapter
- References
Keywords:
- acoustic emission;
- SiC;
- deviation;
- interlaminar tensile;
- C-coupon tests
Summary
Modal acoustic emission (AE) was used to monitor the acoustic activity during room temperature and elevated temperature c-coupon tests for a variety of SiC/SiC systems including composites containing Sylramic®, ZMI™, or Hi-Nicalon™ fibers with meit-infiltrated or polymer-infiltrated SiC matrices. Modal AE proved excellent at monitoring matrix cracking in the curved portion of the C-coupon specimen with increasing load. This included the load at which the first AE event occurred and the location of AE events during the test that were, presumably, caused by the formation and growth of interlaminar cracks and, at higher loads, transverse cracks. Graphical techniques were employed to estimate the load for 1st AE. It was determined that for this test with these material systems, the first AE could be estimated within the load range bounded by the load at which initial deviation from linearity of the load-displacement curve occurs and the load where the 98% offset of the linear regression fit intercepted the load-displacement curve. The calculation of interlaminar tensile stress from the load for 1st AE was determined for all the systems. Ultimate ILT strength usually corresponded to ILT stress determined from the ultimate load to failure of the C-coupon test, which was considerably higher than the first cracking stress.
