Chapter

You have free access to this content

4 Bias in Psychological Assessment

An Empirical Review and Recommendations

Assessment Psychology

I. ASSESSMENT ISSUES

  1. Cecil R. Reynolds PhD1,
  2. Lisa A. Suzuki PhD2

Published Online: 26 SEP 2012

DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop210004

Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

How to Cite

Reynolds, C. R. and Suzuki, L. A. 2012. Bias in Psychological Assessment. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. 10:I:4.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Texas A& M University, Department of Educational Psychology, College Station, Texas, USA

  2. 2

    New York University, Department of Applied Psychology, New York, New York, USA

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 26 SEP 2012

References

  1. References
  • Adebimpe, V. R., Gigandet, J., & Harris, E. (1979). MMPI diagnosis of black psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 8587.
  • Alley, G., & Foster, C. (1978). Nondiscriminatory testing of minority and exceptional children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 9, 114.
  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on Multicultural Education, Training, Research, Practice, and Organizational Change for Psychologists. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/policy/multicultural-guidelines.aspx
  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Arnold, B., Montgomery, G., Castaneda, I., & Longoria, R. (1994). Acculturation and performance of Hispanics on selected Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological tests. Assessment, 1, 239248.
  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1973). The development of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Arno. (Original work published 1916)
  • Boivin, M., Chounramany, C., Giordani, B., Xaisida, S., Choulamountry, L., Pholsena, P., et al. (1996). Validating a cognitive ability testing protocol with Lao children for community development applications. Neuropsychology, 10, 112.
  • Bossard, M., Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1980). A regression analysis of test bias on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 5254.
  • Bouchard, T. J., & Segal, N. L. (1985). Environment and IQ. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 391464). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Brooks, A. P. (1997). TAAS unfair to minorities, lawsuit claims. Austin American-Statesman, p. A1.
  • Brown, R. T., Reynolds, C. R., & Whitaker, J. S. (1999). Bias in mental testing since “Bias in Mental Testing.” School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 208238.
  • Butcher, J. N. (1982). Cross-cultural research methods in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Black children: Social educational and parental environments (pp. 3351). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Butcher, J. N. (2009). Clinical personality assessment: History, evolution, contemporary models, and practical applications. In. J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 521). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1979). Are culture fair intelligence tests possible and necessary? Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 313.
  • Cheung, F. M., Leong, F. T. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2003). Psychological assessment in Asia: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 15, 243247.
  • Chipman, S., Marshall, S., & Scott, P. (1991). Content effect on word-problem performance: A possible source of test bias? American Educational Research Journal, 28, 897915.
  • Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated universities. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 118124.
  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 1541.
  • Cortez v. Rosen (N.D. Cal., Docket No. C-73-388-SW, March 11, 1975).
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Drenth, P. J. D. (Eds.). (1972). Mental tests and cultural adaptation. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Dana, R. H. (2005). Multicultural assessment: Principles, application, and examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dean, R. S. (1979, September). WISC-R factor structure for Anglo and Hispanic children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
  • DeFries, J. C., Vandenberg, S. G., McClearn, G. E., Kuse, A. R., Wilson, J. R., Ashton, G. C., et al. (1974). Near identity of cognitive structure in two ethnic groups. Science, 183, 338339.
  • Dent, H. E. (1996). Non-biased assessment or realistic assessment? In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Handbook of tests and measurement for Black populations (Vol. 1, pp. 103122). Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry.
  • Ebel, R. L. (1979). Intelligence: A skeptical view. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 1421.
  • Educational Testing Service. (2002). Standards for quality and fairness and international principles for fairness review of assessments. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/About_ETS/pdf/frintl.pdf
  • Eells, K., Davis, A., Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E., & Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cultural differences: A study of cultural learning and problem-solving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Edwards, O. W., & Oakland, T. D. (2006). Factorial invariance of Woodcock-Johnson III scores for African Americans and Caucasian Americans. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(4), 358366.
  • Elliot, R. (1987). Litigating intelligence. Dover, MA: Auburn House.
  • Ellis, B. B. (1991). Item response theory: A tool for assessing the equivalence of translated tests. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 18, 3351.
  • Figueroa, R. A. (1991). Bilingualism and psychometrics. Diagnostique, 17(1), 7085.
  • Fine, B. (1975). The stranglehold of the IQ. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  • Flynn, J. R. (1991). Asian-Americans: Achievement beyond IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Freedle, R. O. (2003). Correcting the SATs ethnic and social class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 143.
  • Freedle, R. O. (2010). On replicating ethnic test bias effects: The Santelices and Wilson study. Harvard Educational Review, 80(3), 394403.
  • Freedle, R. O., & Kostin, I. (1997). Predicting Black and White differential item functioining in verbal analogy performance. Intelligence, 24(3), 417444.
  • Geisinger, K. F. (2005). The testing industry, ethnic minorities, and individuals with disabilities. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.) Defending standardized testing (pp. 187204). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gerkin, K. C. (1978). Performance of Mexican-American children on intelligence tests. Exceptional Children, 44, 438443.
  • Gopaul-McNicol, S. & Armour-Thomas, E. (2002). Assessment and culture: Psychological tests with minority populations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Gould, S. J. (1995). Curveball. In S. Fraser (Ed.), The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence, and the future of America (pp. 1122). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (rev. ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
  • Graves, S., & Mitchell, A. (2011). Is the moratorium over? African American psychology professionals' views on intelligence testing in response to changes in federal policy. Journal of Black Psychology, 37(4), 407425.
  • Gross, M. (1967). Learning readiness in two Jewish groups. New York, NY: Center for Urban Education.
  • Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Guterman, S. S. (1979). IQ tests in research on social stratification: The cross-class validity of the tests as measures of scholastic aptitude. Sociology of Education, 52, 163173.
  • Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (1980). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 3439.
  • Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (1981). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for white and black children from the standardization sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 227231.
  • Hagie, M. U., Gallipo, P. L., & Svien, L. (2003). Traditional culture versus traditional assessment for American Indian students: An investigation of potential test item bias. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 1525.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 5465.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229244.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Bollwark, J. (1991). Adapting tests for use in different cultures: Technical issues and methods. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 18, 332.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147157.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In D. Matsumoto & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 4674). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hammill, D. D. (1991). Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1997). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Harrington, G. M. (1968a). Genetic-environmental interaction in “intelligence”: I. Biometric genetic analysis of maze performance of Rattus norvegicus. Developmental Psychology, 1, 211218.
  • Harrington, G. M. (1968b). Genetic-environmental interaction in “intelligence”: II. Models of behavior, components of variance, and research strategy. Developmental Psychology, 1, 245253.
  • Harrington, G. M. (1975). Intelligence tests may favor the majority groups in a population. Nature, 258, 708709.
  • Harrington, G. M. (1976, September). Minority test bias as a psychometric artifact: The experimental evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Hartlage, L. C., Lucas, T., & Godwin, A. (1976). Culturally biased and culturally fair tests correlated with school performance in culturally disadvantaged children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 325327.
  • Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 10831101.
  • Helms, J. E. (2006). Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial/group assessment: A quantitative perspective. American Psychologist, 61, 845859.
  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Hilliard, A. G. III. (1979). Standardization and cultural bias as impediments to the scientific study and validation of “intelligence.” Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 4758.
  • Hilliard, A. G. III. (1984). IQ testing as the emperor's new clothes: A critique of Jensen's Bias in Mental Testing. In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 139169). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721735.
  • Jackson, G. D. (1975). Another psychological view from the Association of Black Psychologists. American Psychologist, 30, 8893.
  • James, B. J. (1995). A test of Harrington's experimental model of ethnic bias in testing applied to a measure of emotional functioning in adolescents. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1123.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1974). How biased are culture loaded tests? Genetic Psychology Monographs, 90, 185224.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1976). Test bias and construct validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 58, 340346.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1977). An examination of culture bias in the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Intelligence, 1, 5164.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1984). Test bias: Concepts and criticisms. In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 507586). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Kaiser, S. (1986). Ability patterns of black and white adults on the WAIS-R independent of general intelligence and as a function of socioeconomic status. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (1987). Clinical and research applications of the K-ABC. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (1973). Comparison of the performance of matched groups of black children and white children on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 186191.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1973). Black-white differences on the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 196206.
  • Keith, T. Z., & Reynolds, C. R. (1990). Measurement and design issues in child assessment research. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G., & Spuhler, J. N. (1975). Race differences in intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
  • Lonner, W. J. (1985). Issues in testing and assessment in crosscultural counseling. Counseling Psychologist, 13, 599614.
  • Lynn, R. (1995). Cross-cultural differences in intelligence and personality. In D. Sakolfske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), The international handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 107134). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95107.
  • Mainstream science on intelligence. (1994, December 13). Wall Street Journal, p. A18.
  • Maller, S. J. (2003). Best practices in detecting bias in nonverbal tests. In R. S. McCallum (Ed.) Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 2348). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Marjoribanks, K. (1972). Ethnic and environmental influences on mental abilities. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 323337.
  • Mayfield, J. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (1998). Are ethnic differences in diagnosis of childhood psychopathology an artifact of psychometric methods? An experimental evaluation of Harrington's hypothesis using parent report symptomatology. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 313334.
  • McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc Cross Battery Assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • McGurk, F. V. J. (1951). Comparison of the performance of Negro and white high school seniors on cultural and noncultural psychological test questions. Washington, DC: Catholic University of American Press.
  • McShane, D. (1980). A review of scores of American Indian children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. White Cloud Journal, 2, 1822.
  • Mercer, J. R. (1976, August). Cultural diversity, mental retardation, and assessment: The case for nonlabeling. Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Retardation, Washington, DC.
  • Mercer, J. R. (1979). System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment (SOMPA): Conceptual and technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Miele, F. (1979). Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 3, 149164.
  • Monnot, M. J., Quirk, S. W., Hoerger, M. & Brewer, L. (2009). Racial bias in personality assessment: Using the MMPI-2 to predict psychiatric diagnoses of African American and Caucasian chemical dependency inpatients. Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 137151.
  • Morales, E. S., & George, C. (1976, September). Examiner effects in the testing of Mexican-American children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Moran, M. P. (1990). The problem of cultural bias in personality assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. Vol. 2: Personality, behavior, and context (pp. 524545). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Mpofu, E., & Ortiz, S. O. (2009). Equitable assessment practices in diverse contexts. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 4176). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Nandakumar, R., Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993). Mantel-Haenszel methodology for detecting item bias: An introduction and example using the Guide to the Assessment of Test Session Behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11(2), 108119.
  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77101.
  • Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Oakland, T., & Feigenbaum, D. (1979). Multiple sources of test bias on the WISC-R and the Bender-Gestalt Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 968974.
  • Oakland, T., & Matuszek, P. (1977). Using tests in nondiscriminatory assessment. In T. Oakland (Ed.), Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Okazaki, S., & Sue, S. (2000). Implications for test revisions for assessment with Asian Americans. Psychological Assessment, 12(30), 272280.
  • Ortiz, S. O., & Ochoa, S. H. (2005). Advances in cognitive assessment of culturally linguistically diverse individuals. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 234250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Padilla, A. M. (1988). Early psychological assessment of Mexican- American children. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 24, 113115.
  • Payne, B., & Payne, D. (1991). The ability of teachers to identify academically at-risk elementary students. Journal of Research in Childhood education, 5(2), 116126.
  • Pintner, R. (1931). Intelligence testing. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1983). Psychometric approaches to intergroup comparison: The problem of equivalence. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cross-cultural factors (pp. 237258). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Malpass, R. S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1746). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Prifitera, A., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.). (1998). WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Prifitera, A., Weiss, L. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Ramsay, M. C. (1997, November). Structural equation modeling and test bias. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Ramsay, M. C. (1998a, February). Proposed theories of causation drawn from social and physical science epistemology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Education Research Exchange, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Ramsay, M. C. (1998b, February). The processing system in humans: A theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Education Research Exchange, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Ramsay, M. C. (2000). The putative effects of smoking by pregnant women on birthweight, IQ, and developmental disabilities in their infants: A methodological review and multivariate analysis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Ramsay, M. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Separate digits tests: A brief history, a literature review, and a reexamination of the factor structure of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Neuropsychology Review, 5, 151171.
  • Ramsay, M. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (2000a). Development of a scientific test: A practical guide. In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pergamon Press.
  • Ramsay, M. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (2000b). Does smoking by pregnant women influence birth weight, IQ, and developmental disabilities in their infants? A methodological review and multivariate analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 10, 149.
  • Ramsden, S., Richardson, F. M., Josse, G., Thomas, M. S., Ellis, C., Shakeshaft, C., et al. (2011). Verbal and nonverbal changes to the teenage brain. Nature, 479, 113116.
  • Reschly, D. J. (1978). WISC-R factor structures among Anglos, Blacks, Chicanos, and Native American Papagos. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 417422.
  • Reschly, D. J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 437456). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Reschly, D. J. (2000). PASE v. Hannon. In C. R. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education (2nd ed., pp. 13251326). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Reschly, D. J., & Sabers, D. (1979). Analysis of test bias in four groups with the regression definition. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 19.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1978). Differential validity of several preschool assessment instruments for blacks, whites, males, and females. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1980). Differential construct validity of intelligence as popularly measured: Correlation of age and raw scores on the WISC-R for blacks, whites, males and females. Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4, 371379.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982a). Construct and predictive bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (pp. 199227). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982b). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 178208). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Test bias in the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. Saklofsky & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 545576). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1998a). Cultural bias in testing of intelligence and personality. In A. Bellack & M. Hersen (Series Eds.) & C. Belar (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive clinical psychology: Vol. 10. Cross cultural psychology (pp. 5392). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1998b). Need we measure anxiety separately for males and females? Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 212221.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (1999). Cultural bias in testing of intelligence and personality. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Series Eds.) & C. Belar (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive clinical psychology: Vol. 10. Sociocultural and individual differences (pp. 5392). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (2000a). Methods for detecting and evaluating cultural bias in neuropsychological tests. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L. Strickland, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology (pp. 249285). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (2000b). Why is psychometric research on bias in mental testing so often ignored? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 144150.
  • Reynolds, C. R. (2001). Professional manual for the Clinical Assessment Scales for the Elderly. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Bigler, E. D. (1994). Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Brown, R. T. (1984a). Bias in mental testing: An introduction to the issues. In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 139). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Brown, R. T. (1984b). Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Carson, A. D. (2005). Methods for assessing cultural bias in tests. In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 795839). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Reynolds, C. R., Chastain, R., Kaufman, A. S., & McLean, J. (1987). Demographic influences on adult intelligence at ages 16 to 74 years. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 323342.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1980, September). WISC-R performance of blacks and whites matched on four demographic variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1981). A multivariate comparison of the intellectual performance of blacks and whites matched on four demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 175180.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Harding, R. E. (1983). Outcome in two large sample studies of factorial similarity under six methods of comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 723728.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Hartlage, L. C. (1979). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with black and white referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 589591.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Jensen, A. R. (1983, September). Patterns of intellectual performance among blacks and whites matched on “g.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kaiser, S. (1992). Test bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 487525). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC): Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P. A., & Saenz, A. (1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., 549595). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Paget, K. (1981). Factor analysis of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale for blacks, whites, males, and females with a national normative sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 349352.
  • Reynolds, C. R., Willson, V. L., & Chatman, S. P. (1984). Item bias on the 1981 revisions of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test using a new method of detecting bias. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 219221.
  • Reynolds, C. R., Willson, V. L., & Chatman, S. P. (1985). Regression analyses of bias on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 195204.
  • Reynolds, C. R., Willson, V. L., & Ramsay, M. C. (1999). Intellectual differences among Mexican Americans, Papagos and Whites, independent of g. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 11811187.
  • Richardson, T. Q. (1995). The window dressing behind the bell curve. School Psychology Review, 24, 4244.
  • Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised: Examiner's manual. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
  • Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(2), 235294.
  • Samuda, A. J. (1975). Psychological testing of American minorities: Issues and consequences. New York, NY: Dodd.
  • Santelices, M. V., & Wilson, M. (2010). Unfair treatment? The case of Freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to differential item functioning. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 106128.
  • Sandoval, J. (1979). The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 919927.
  • Sandoval, J., & Mille, M. P. W. (1979). Accuracy judgments of WISC-R item difficulty for minority groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
  • Sattler, J. M. (1974). Assessment of children's intelligence. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
  • Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
  • Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
  • Sattler, J. M., & Gwynne, J. (1982). White examiners generally do not impede the intelligence test performance of black children: To debunk a myth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 196208.
  • Scarr, S. (1981). Implicit messages: A review of bias in mental testing. American Journal of Education, 89(3), 330338.
  • Scheuneman, J. D. (1987). An experimental, exploratory study of the causes of bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 97118.
  • Schmidt, W. H. (1983). Content biases in achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 165178.
  • Schoenfeld, W. N. (1974). Notes on a bit of psychological nonsense: “Race differences in intelligence.” Psychological Record, 24, 1732.
  • Scholwinski, E. (1985). Ability patterns of blacks and whites as determined by the subscales on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Shuey, A. M. (1966). The testing of Negro intelligence (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Social Science Press.
  • Spitz, H. (1986). The raising of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797811.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (2004). Stereotype threat does not live by Steele and Aronson alone. American Psychologist, 59(1), 4748.
  • Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Intelligence and test bias: Art and science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 353354.
  • Suzuki, L. A., & Aronson, J. (2005). The cultural malleability of intelligence and its impact on the racial/ethnic hierarchy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(2), 320327.
  • Suzuki, L. A., Kugler, J. F., & Aguiar, L. J. (2005). Assessment practices in racial-cultural psychology. In R. T. Carter (Ed.) Handbook of racial-cultural psychology and counseling: Training and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 297315). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Suzuki, L. A., Onoue, M. A., & Hill, J. (forthcoming). Clinical assessment: A multicultural perspective. In K. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology. Washington, DC: APA Books.
  • Suzuki, L. A., & Ponterotto, J. G. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological and educational applications (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Sage.
  • Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Concepts of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 6370.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1980). Psychology of gifted children and youth. In W. M. Cruickshank (Ed.), Psychology of exceptional children and youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Tyler, L. E. (1965). The psychology of human differences. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Valencia, R. A., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing with minority students: Foundations, performance factors and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Valencia, R. A., Suzuki, L. A., & Salinas, M. (2001). Test bias. In R. R. Valencia & L. A. Suzuki, Intelligence testing with minority students: Foundations, performance factors and assessment issues (pp. 111181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119135.
  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologists, 1, 8999.
  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1991). Culture-free measurement in the history of cross-cultural psychology. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 18, 7287.
  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In D. Matsumoto and F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 1745). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Verney, S. P., Granholm, E., Marshall, S. P., Malcarne, V. L., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Culture-fair cognitive ability assessment: Information processing and psychophysiological approaches. Assessment, 12, 303319.
  • Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30, 135139.
  • Weiss, L. G., & Prifitera, A. (1995). An evaluation of differential prediction of WIAT achievement scores from WISC-III FSIQ across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 297304.
  • Weiss, L. G., Prifitera, A., & Roid, G. H. (1993). The WISC-III and fairness of predicting achievement across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 3542.
  • Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & Hessen, D. J. (2005). Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 696719.
  • Wigdor, A. K., & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Willerman, L. (1979). The psychology of individual and group differences. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
  • Williams, R. L. (1970). Danger: Testing and dehumanizing Black children. Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 9, 56.
  • Williams, R. L. (1974). From dehumanization to black intellectual genocide: A rejoinder. In G. J. Williams & S. Gordon (Eds.), Clinical child psychology: Current practices and future perspectives. New York, NY: Behavioral Publications.
  • Williams, R. L., Dotson, W., Dow, P., & Williams, W. S. (1980). The war against testing: A current status report. Journal of Negro Education, 49, 263273.
  • Willson, V. L., Nolan, R. F., Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1989). Race and gender effects on item functioning on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 289296.
  • Wright, B. J., & Isenstein, V. R. (1977–1978). Psychological tests and minorities (DHEW Publication No. ADM 78–482). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Mental Health.
  • Zieky, M. (2006). Fairness review in assessment. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of Test Development (pp. 359376). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.