21. Improving the Traditional Editing Process

  1. Brenda G. Cox2,
  2. David A. Binder3,
  3. B. Nanjamma Chinnappa3,
  4. Anders Christianson4,
  5. Michael J. Colledge5 and
  6. Phillip S. Kott6
  1. Leopold Granquist

Published Online: 17 OCT 2011

DOI: 10.1002/9781118150504.ch21

Business Survey Methods

Business Survey Methods

How to Cite

Granquist, L. (1995) Improving the Traditional Editing Process, in Business Survey Methods (eds B. G. Cox, D. A. Binder, B. N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M. J. Colledge and P. S. Kott), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9781118150504.ch21

Editor Information

  1. 2

    Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

  2. 3

    Statistics Canada

  3. 4

    Statistics Sweden

  4. 5

    Australian Bureau of Statistics

  5. 6

    U. S. National Agricultural Statistics Service

Author Information

  1. Statistics Sweden

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 17 OCT 2011
  2. Published Print: 16 FEB 1995

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9780471598527

Online ISBN: 9781118150504

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • traditional editing process;
  • matching editing;
  • statistical edits;
  • macroediting;
  • graphical methods

Summary

This chapter contains sections titled:

  • What is Editing?

  • Problems with Editing

  • Possible Solutions to Common Problems

  • Methods for Rationalizing Editing

  • Concluding Remarks