Quantification of Detrital, Authigenic and Porosity Components of the Fontainebleau Sandstone: A Comparison of Conventional Optical and Combined Scanning Electron Microscope-Based Methods of Modal Analyses
- Richard H. Worden5,
- Sadoon Morad6
Published Online: 17 MAR 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304237.ch7
Copyright © 2000 The International Association of Sedimentologists
Book Title

Quartz Cementation in Sandstones
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cooper, M. R., Evans, J., Flint, S. S., Hogg, A. J. C. and Hunter, R. H. (2009) Quantification of Detrital, Authigenic and Porosity Components of the Fontainebleau Sandstone: A Comparison of Conventional Optical and Combined Scanning Electron Microscope-Based Methods of Modal Analyses, in Quartz Cementation in Sandstones (eds R. H. Worden and S. Morad), Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781444304237.ch7
Editor Information
- 5
School of Geosciences, The Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
- 6
Sedimentary Geology Research Group, Institute of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 B, S–75236, Uppsala, Sweden
Publication History
- Published Online: 17 MAR 2009
- Published Print: 3 MAR 2000
ISBN Information
Print ISBN: 9780632054824
Online ISBN: 9781444304237
- Summary
- Chapter
Keywords:
- quantification of detrital, authigenic and porosity components of Fontainebleau sandstone;
- quartz arenites - sandstones containing detrital quartz;
- Fontainebleau Sandstone forming part of Paris Basin;
- detrital texture;
- modal analysis—methods;
- SEM-based combined BSEM, CL and image analysis;
- image processing and analysis;
- measurement of post-cementation intergranular porosity
Summary
Textural and mineralogical maturity make the Fontainebleau Sandstone an ideal quartz arenite in which to investigate porosity reduction which has occurred by compaction and quartz cementation. However, measurement of quartz overgrowth volumes, using optical point counting methods, is problematic due to difficulties in distinguishing between detrital grains and overgrowths.
Optical point counting and scanning electron microscope (SEM)-based modal analysis methods have been undertaken on samples to independently measure the percentages of detrital quartz, quartz overgrowths, porosity and minus-cement porosity. Total core-plug porosity was measured using helium porosimetry. The results of each technique are compared in order to highlight the advantages, possible errors and/or limitations imposed by each method.
Comparison of total porosity measured using point counting with helium porosity shows that point counting results are at fault. Total porosities measured using the SEM and helium porosimetry methods are almost identical. It is proposed that the SEM-based method could be used to correct optical data sets, producing quantitative data at relatively low cost.
