Carbonate Cements: Their Regional Distribution and Interpretation in Mississippian Limestones of Southwestern New Mexico

  1. Maurice E. Tucker2 and
  2. Robin G. C. Bathurst3
  1. W. J. Meyers

Published Online: 29 APR 2009

DOI: 10.1002/9781444304510.ch20

Carbonate Diagenesis

Carbonate Diagenesis

How to Cite

Meyers, W. J. (1990) Carbonate Cements: Their Regional Distribution and Interpretation in Mississippian Limestones of Southwestern New Mexico, in Carbonate Diagenesis (eds M. E. Tucker and R. G. C. Bathurst), Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781444304510.ch20

Editor Information

  1. 2

    Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, UK

  2. 3

    Derwen Deg Fawr, Llanfair DC, Ruthin, Clwyd, North Wales, UK

Author Information

  1. Department of Earth & Space Sciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 29 APR 2009
  2. Published Print: 21 AUG 1990

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9780632029389

Online ISBN: 9781444304510

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • carbonate cements - regional distribution and interpretation in Mississippian limestones;
  • meteoric-marine mixing-zone phreatic cements;
  • middle part of transgressive-regressive couplet, consisting lime mudstones;
  • Tierra Blanca echinoderm-bryozoan packstones and grainstones, representing progradation;
  • echinoderm-rich shelf facies, extending eastward into the San Andres and Sacramento Mts;
  • inclusion-free echinoderm-syntaxial cements, abundant in bioherm core facies of the Sacramento Mts;
  • fine-grained inclusion-free prismatic cements, occurring as rare cement type

Summary

Calcite cements in Mississippian skeletal packstones and grainstones of southwestern New Mexico are dominated by echinoderm-syntaxial, inclusion-free calcites that can be divided into four major compositional zones (from oldest to youngest: zone 1, 2, 3, 5) based mainly on varying FeII and MnII contents. These compositional zones are interpreted as ‘time stratigraphic’ units as indicated by petrographic evidence for age gaps between zones, and by consistency of their ages on a regional scale. As such, these cement zones can be correlated over most or all of the approximately 30,000 km2 of study area, based on similarity of age, number and sequence of major zones. The inclusion-free calcite cements comprise approximately 95% of the total cements, of which the pre-Pennsylvanian zones (zones 1, 2, 3) make up about 60%, and the post-Mississippian zone 5 makes up about 40% of the total cements. These cements are interpreted as meteoric phreatic on the basis of MnII and FeII content, crystal clarity, cement morphology, substrate selectivity, low Mg content, and absence of marine and vadose characteristics.

In the southern part of the study area zone 2 contains significant amounts of meteoric-marine mixing-zone phreatic cements. These mixing-zone cements are identified by their similarity in morphology, luminescence and substrate selectivity to the inclusion-free meteoric phreatic cements, but contain microdolomite inclusions indicative of former high-Mg calcites. Their restriction to the south is interpreted to have resulted from relatively long residence time of the mixing zone in the south during zone 2 precipitation.

Strictly marine subtidal and beachrock cements make up less than 1% of the total cements, and meteoric vadose cements are virtually absent.

Regional distribution of the pre-Pennsylvanian cement zones suggests a model of cementation during a world-wide late Mississippian eustatic regression identified by Vail & Mitchum (1976). Specifically, pre-zone 1 and zone 1 meteoric phreatic cements formed during regression within a shallow oxygenated (?) groundwater system; zone 2 formed during the later part of the regression and during stillstand in a deep-seated, more extensive flow system; zone 3 formed during subsequent transgression in a shallow groundwater system. The post-Chester, pre-Pennsylvanian unconformity resulted mainly in microkarsting and weathering. The main difference, other than scale, between this model and those derived from diagenetic studies of Quaternary limestones is that it implies that major cementation occurred during sea-level changes in epeiric settings, rather than only during stillstands.