15. A Century of Psychology and Law
Successes, Challenges, and Future Opportunities
- Paul R. Martin1,
- Fanny M. Cheung BA PhD2,
- Michael C. Knowles MCom (Qld), PhD (Edin)3,
- Michael Kyrios4,
- J. Bruce Overmier5,
- José M. Prieto6
Published Online: 20 APR 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444395150.ch15
Copyright © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Book Title

IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011) A Century of Psychology and Law, in IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology (eds P. R. Martin, F. M. Cheung, M. C. Knowles, M. Kyrios, J. B. Overmier and J. M. Prieto), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781444395150.ch15
Editor Information
- 1
Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
- 2
Chinese University of Hong Kong
- 3
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 4
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
- 5
University of Minnesota, USA
- 6
Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Publication History
- Published Online: 20 APR 2011
- Published Print: 1 APR 2011
Book Series:
ISBN Information
Print ISBN: 9781405193313
Online ISBN: 9781444395150
- Summary
- Chapter
- References
Keywords:
- century of psychology and law - successes, challenges and future opportunities;
- Munsterberg's seminal work, On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime (1908) - contemporary field of psychology and law, passing the first century mark;
- conventional wisdom, field of psychology and law - marked by Munsterberg's book, On the Witness Stand;
- legal psychology, umbrella term for field - areas of focus within field, referred to more specifically;
- rise(s) of the field of legal psychology;
- legal realism view, in late 1920s and early 1930s - deep and lasting impact on law, legal realism ceasing to be a force by the 1950s;
- violence risk assessment - discordance between law's expectations, and psychologists and psychiatrists predicting risk, accurately;
- so-called “second generation” of risk assessment - identification of appropriate variables for prediction of violence, culminating in development of “actuarial” risk assessment tools;
- SPJ approach, increasing predictive validity of violence risk judgments - Douglas, Ogloff, and Hart (2003), comparing predictive validity of HCR-20 violence risk instrument;
- law and policy, rationality of empirical outcomes - not always resulting in rational policy development
Summary
This chapter contains sections titled:
From a Humble Beginning1
Defining the Field
The Rise(s) of the Field of Legal Psychology
Two Examples of Some Success
Some Challenges and Opportunities
Conclusion
Acknowledgment
References
