18. Evaluating the Reliability of Controversial Scientific Results

  1. Prof. Dr. Günter Obe2,3,
  2. Dr. Burkhard Jandrig4,
  3. Prof. Dr. Gary E. Marchant5,
  4. Dipl. Päd. Holger Schütz6 and
  5. Prof. Dr. Peter M. Wiedemann7
  1. Alexander Lerchl

Published Online: 27 APR 2011

DOI: 10.1002/9783527634613.ch18

Cancer Risk Evaluation: Methods and Trends

Cancer Risk Evaluation: Methods and Trends

How to Cite

Lerchl, A. (2011) Evaluating the Reliability of Controversial Scientific Results, in Cancer Risk Evaluation: Methods and Trends (eds G. Obe, B. Jandrig, G. E. Marchant, H. Schütz and P. M. Wiedemann), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany. doi: 10.1002/9783527634613.ch18

Editor Information

  1. 2

    Ret. from University Duisburg-Essen, Germany

  2. 3

    Gershwinstrasse 33, 14513 Teltow, Germany

  3. 4

    Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany

  4. 5

    Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, P.O. Box 877906, Tempe, AZ 85287-796, USA

  5. 6

    Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-8), 52425 Jülich, Germany

  6. 7

    Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), TAB – Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Neue Schönhauser Straße 10, 10178 Berlin, Germany

Author Information

  1. Jacobs University Bremen, School of Engineering and Science, Research II, Campus Ring 6, 28759 Bremen, Germany

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 27 APR 2011
  2. Published Print: 20 APR 2011

ISBN Information

Print ISBN: 9783527327539

Online ISBN: 9783527634613

SEARCH

Keywords:

  • data fabrication;
  • manipulated data;
  • parametric test;
  • raw data;
  • scientific misconduct;
  • specific absorption rate

Summary

This chapter contains sections titled:

  • Introduction

  • Detection of Scientific Misconduct

  • Committee on Publication Ethics

  • Conclusions

  • References