Deviancy and Normative Training Processes in Experimental Groups of Delinquent and Nondelinquent Male Adolescents
Article first published online: 24 OCT 2012
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 39, Issue 1, pages 30–44, January 2013
How to Cite
Mathys, C., Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S. and Born, M. (2013), Deviancy and Normative Training Processes in Experimental Groups of Delinquent and Nondelinquent Male Adolescents. Aggr. Behav., 39: 30–44. doi: 10.1002/ab.21456
- Issue published online: 22 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 24 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Received: 24 NOV 2011
- deviancy training process;
- juvenile delinquent;
- mixed groups;
- multilevel analysis
The goal of this study was to identify the predictors and the moderators of group characteristics that influence deviancy and normative training processes in delinquent male adolescents. The authors experimentally tested the effects of group composition on deviant talk interaction processes among groups in which all members presented delinquent behaviors (“pure” delinquent group condition), those that included adolescents with no delinquent behaviors (“pure” normative group condition), and adolescents with both profiles (“mixed” group condition). Participants were 70 male adolescents aged 15–18 (M = 16.5; 56% Caucasian), with a random assignment to groups. Data were collected among three group sessions (T1, T2, T3), one session a week, using videotape. Two contents of interactions were also measured: antisocial and normative stories, counterbalanced across sessions. Results showed a significant group effect for antisocial talk and its reinforcement, with less antisocial talk within the mixed group condition in comparison to the pure delinquent group condition. The topic of interaction was also observed as a predictor of antisocial talk, with less normative interactions and more antisocial talk associated with antisocial topics. Finally, time moderated some relations between experimental groups and talk. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for future research on deviancy training processes. Aggr. Behav. 39:30-44, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.