Research Article
Conjunction in simulated railway signals: a cautionary note
Article first published online: 16 JUN 2005
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1135
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Groeger, J. A., Clegg, B. A. and O'Shea, G. (2005), Conjunction in simulated railway signals: a cautionary note. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19: 973–984. doi: 10.1002/acp.1135
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 NOV 2005
- Article first published online: 16 JUN 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Train drivers routinely perform visual search tasks to locate combinations of coloured signals controlling their progress, and are required to make discrete decisions on the basis of what they see. Two studies are reported which examine the performance of students under conditions that simulate critical aspects of United Kingdom train drivers' signal-response task. The most crucial cautionary signal, the single yellow signal used to alert a transition to potentially hazardous situations, was responded to more slowly than other signal types. A longer processing time was found whether (Study 2) or not (Study 1) the signal appearance was accompanied by the auditory warning signal train drivers encounter under actual driving conditions. The results are consistent with predictions from Treisman and Gelade's (1980) Feature Integration Theory, and the implications for signal sighting practice are discussed. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-0720/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=7492af932e462936404b4554faa02d67feaa9273)
1099-0720/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=a04b9b2c176a7e69e22f94deb74af38d106ec028)
1099-0720/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=8845e8a20556489e7762289f53f30058df4d21c0)