SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone, The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks benefit from different schedules of study, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2015, 22, 1, 281

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone, Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization, Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, 5,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Steven B. Goldin, Gregory T. Horn, Michael J. Schnaus, Mark Grichanik, Adam J. Ducey, Charles Nofsinger, David J. Hernandez, Murray L. Shames, Raman P. Singh, Michael T. Brannick, FLS Skill Acquisition: A Comparison of Blocked vs Interleaved Practice, Journal of Surgical Education, 2014, 71, 4, 506

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    M. A. Rau, V. Aleven, N. Rummel, Z. Pardos, How Should Intelligent Tutoring Systems Sequence Multiple Graphical Representations of Fractions? A Multi-Methods Study, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2014, 24, 2, 125

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Ruth Chen, Lawrence Grierson, Geoffrey Norman, Manipulation of cognitive load variables and impact on auscultation test performance, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Hannah Hausman, Nate Kornell, Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2014, 3, 3, 153

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone, Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study, Memory & Cognition, 2014, 42, 3, 481

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Juan Carlos Olabe, Xabier Basogain, Miguel Ángel Olabe, Inmaculada Maíz, Carlos Castaño, Solving math and science problems in the real world with a computational mind, Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2014, 3, 2, 72

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Thomas H. Carr, Strengths and weaknesses of reflection as a guide to action: pressure assails performance in multiple ways, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2014,

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Doug Rohrer, Robert F. Dedrick, Kaleena Burgess, The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2014, 21, 5, 1323

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Katherine A. Rawson, Ruthann C. Thomas, Larry L. Jacoby, The Power of Examples: Illustrative Examples Enhance Conceptual Learning of Declarative Concepts, Educational Psychology Review, 2014,

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Charles E. Downing, Julia Spears, Michaela Holtz, Transforming a Course to Blended Learning for Student Engagement, Education Research International, 2014, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Carolina E. Küpper-Tetzel, Understanding the Distributed Practice Effect, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2014, 222, 2, 71

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    John R. Pani, Julia H. Chariker, Farah Naaz, Computer-based learning: Interleaving whole and sectional representation of neuroanatomy, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 1
  15. 15
    Martina A. Rau, Vincent Aleven, Nikol Rummel, Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave?, Learning and Instruction, 2013, 23, 98

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Elizabeth R. Goldenberg, Catherine M. Sandhofer, Same, varied, or both? Contextual support aids young children in generalizing category labels, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2013, 115, 1, 150

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Robert A. Bjork, John Dunlosky, Nate Kornell, Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions, Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64, 1, 417

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Shana K. Carpenter, Frank E. Mueller, The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning, Memory & Cognition, 2013, 41, 5, 671

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Natalia Maillard Álvarez, Un mercader véneto en la Carrera de Indias: el relato de Alessandro Fontana (1618), Anuario de Estudios Americanos, 2013, 70, 1, 307

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Monica S. Birnbaum, Nate Kornell, Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, Robert A. Bjork, Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval, Memory & Cognition, 2013, 41, 3, 392

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Lisa K. Son, Dominic A. Simon, Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications, Educational Psychology Review, 2012, 24, 3, 379

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Kathryn T. Wissman, Katherine A. Rawson, Mary A. Pyc, How and when do students use flashcards?, Memory, 2012, 20, 6, 568

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Henry L. Roediger, Mary A. Pyc, Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2012, 1, 4, 242

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Jennifer G. Cromley, James P. Byrnes, Instruction and cognition, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2012, 3, 5
  25. 25
    Doug Rohrer, Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts, Educational Psychology Review, 2012, 24, 3, 355

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Paulo F. Carvalho, Pedro B. Albuquerque, Memory encoding of stimulus features in human perceptual learning, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 24, 6, 654

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Shana K. Carpenter, Nicholas J. Cepeda, Doug Rohrer, Sean H. K. Kang, Harold Pashler, Using Spacing to Enhance Diverse Forms of Learning: Review of Recent Research and Implications for Instruction, Educational Psychology Review, 2012, 24, 3, 369

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Pooja K. Agarwal, Henry L. Roediger, Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test, Memory, 2011, 19, 8, 836

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    References,