SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bernstein, D. M., Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2002). Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 432438.
  • Cotter, R. (2008). Well, it looks like truth. New York Times. Retrieved 17 November 2008, from www.nytimes.com
  • Democracy Now. (2005). NY law enforcement caught doctoring video of RNC arrests. Retrieved 17 November 2008, from www.democracynow.org/2005/4/14/ny_law_enforcement_caught_doctoring_video
  • Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33, 770782.
  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533543.
  • Garry, M., & Gerrie, M. P. (2005). When photographs create false memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 321325.
    Direct Link:
  • Garry, M., & Wade, K. A. (2005). Actually, a picture is worth less than 45 words: Narratives produce more false memories than photographs do. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 359366.
  • Henkel, L. A., & Carbuto, M. (2008). Remembering what we did: How source misattributions arise from verbalization, mental imagery, and pictures. In M. R.Kelley (Ed.), Applied memory (pp. 213234). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L.RoedigerIII, & F. I. M.Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving C (pp. 391422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 328.
  • Kassin, S. M. (2008). The psychology of confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 193217.
  • Kassin, S. M., & Dunn, M. A. (1997). Computer-animated displays and the jury: Facilitative and prejudicial effects. Law & Human Behavior, 21, 269281.
  • Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125128.
    Direct Link:
  • Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source Monitoring. In H. L.RoedigerIII. (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (4 Vols, J. Byrne Editor) (pp. 325348). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Loftus, E. F. (2003). Our changeable memories: Legal and practical implications. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 4, 231234.
  • Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361366.
  • Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585589.
  • Mazzoni, G., & Kirsch, I. (2002). Autobiographical memories and beliefs: A preliminary metacognitive model. In T. J.Perfect, & B. L.Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 121146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343352.
  • Nash, R. A., & Wade, K. A. (2009). Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored video evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 624637.
  • Nash, R. A., Wade, K. A., & Brewer, R. J. (in press). Why do doctored-images distort memory? Consciousness & Cognition.
  • Nash, R. A., Wade, K. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2009). Digitally manipulating memory: Effects of doctored videos and imagination in distorting beliefs and memories. Memory & Cognition, 37, 414424.
  • Peterson, G. (2006). Forensic analysis of digital image tampering. In M.Pollitt, & S.Shenoi (Eds.), Advances in digital forensics. New York: Springer.
  • Sacchi, D. L., Agnoli, F., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). Changing history: Doctored photographs affect memory for past public events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 10051022.
  • Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2009). The gatekeeper effect: The impact of judges' admissibility decisions on the persuasiveness of expert testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 118.
  • Strange, D., Sutherland, R., & Garry, M. (2006). Event plausibility does not determine children's false memories. Memory, 14, 937951.
  • Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Nash, R. A., & Harper, D. (2009). Verbal and photographic evidence combined can produce false memories—but presentation order matters. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Read, J. D., & Lindsay, D. S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 597603.
  • Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 174178.
    Direct Link: