Get access

The Cognitive Interview for Use with Adults: An Empirical Test of an Alternative Mnemonic and of a Partial Protocol

Authors

  • Cindy Colomb,

    Corresponding author
    1. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Magali Ginet

    1. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
    Search for more papers by this author

Cindy Colomb, LAPSCO/CNRS/UBP-34, Avenue Carnot, 63037, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

E-mail: cindy.colomb@univ-bpclermont.fr

Summary

Research showed that the four Cognitive Interview (CI) mnemonics used individually are unequally effective. We propose to test (i) their benefit when used within the same free recall phase and (ii) an original instruction, ‘guided peripheral focus’ (GPF). In two studies, 84 and 42 students were interviewed with Structured Interviews (SI), CIs or CI variations about a film viewed 1 week before. Results indicated that (i) if a CI variation with the GPF instead of the ‘perspective’ elicits more correct information than an SI or a CI, variations replacing the ‘perspective’ or the ‘order’ and ‘perspective’ with control instruction(s) do not; (ii) a partial CI integrating the ‘everything’, ‘context’ and GPF increases correct information compared with an SI, whereas the CI does not. We will discuss in which extent these results demonstrate the effectiveness of the ‘everything’, ‘context’ and ‘GPF’ and a potential lack of benefit of the ‘order’ and ‘perspective’. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary