Research Article

A Comparison of Adult Witnesses' Suggestibility Across Various Types of Leading Questions

  1. Stefanie J. Sharman*,
  2. Martine B. Powell

Article first published online: 27 MAR 2011

DOI: 10.1002/acp.1793

Issue

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volume 26, Issue 1, pages 48–53, January/February 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Sharman, S. J. and Powell, M. B. (2012), A Comparison of Adult Witnesses' Suggestibility Across Various Types of Leading Questions. Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 26: 48–53. doi: 10.1002/acp.1793

Author Information

*Stefanie J. Sharman, School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.
E-mail: stefanie.sharman@deakin.edu.au

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 18 JAN 2012
  2. Article first published online: 27 MAR 2011

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (128K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Gareth Rowe, Helen Nevin, Bringing ‘patient voice’ into psychological formulations of in-patients with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and severe challenging behaviours: report of a service improvement pilot, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2013, 41, 2
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (128K)