Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population

Authors

  • Emilio Lobato,

    Corresponding author
    1. Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
    • Correspondence to: Emilio Lobato, University of Central Florida, Institute for Simulation and Training, 3100 Technology Parkway, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.

      E-mail: elobato@ist.ucf.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jorge Mendoza,

    1. Department of Political Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Valerie Sims,

    1. Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Matthew Chin

    1. Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Summary

Very little research has investigated whether believing in paranormal, conspiracy, and pseudoscientific claims are related, even though they share the property of having no epistemic warrant. The present study investigated the association between these categories of epistemically unwarranted beliefs. Results revealed moderate to strong positive correlations between the three categories of epistemically unwarranted beliefs, suggesting that believers in one type tended to also endorse other types. In addition, one individual difference measure, looking at differences in endorsing ontological confusions, was found to be predictive of both paranormal and conspiracy beliefs. Understanding the relationship between peoples' beliefs in these types of claims has theoretical implications for research into why individuals believe empirically unsubstantiated claims. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ancillary