SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Song IH, Althoff CE, Hermann KG, Scheel AK, Knetsch T, Schoenharting M, et al. Knee osteoarthritis: efficacy of a new method of contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography in detection of synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1925.
  • 2
    Altman R, Brandt K, Hochberg M, Moskowitz R, Bellamy N, Bloch DA, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Results from a workshop. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 21743.
  • 3
    Visser M, Newman AB, Nevitt MC, Kritchevsky SB, Stamm EB, Goodpaster BH, et al, and the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study Research Group. Reexamining the sarcopenia hypothesis: muscle mass versus muscle strength. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 904: 45661.
  • 4
    Felson DT, Niu J, Guermazi A, Roemer F, Aliabadi P, Clancy M, et al. Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 298692.
  • 5
    National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. Osteoarthritis Initiative. 2007. URL: http://www.niams.nih.gov/ne/oi/index.htm.
  • 6
    Buckland-Wright C. Protocols for precise radio-anatomical positioning of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995; 3 Suppl A: 7180.
  • 7
    Dacre JE, Coppock JS, Herbert KE, Perrett D, Huskisson EC. Development of a new radiographic scoring system using digital image analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 1989; 48: 194200.
  • 8
    Lynch JA, Buckland-Wright C, Macfarlane DG. Precision of joint space width measurment in knee osteoarthritis from digital image analysis of high definition macroradiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1993; 1: 20918.
  • 9
    Duryea J, Li J, Peterfy CG, Gordon C, Genant HK. Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee. Med Phys 2000; 27: 58091.
  • 10
    Vignon E, Piperno M, Le Graverand MP, Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Mathieu P, et al. Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 37884.
  • 11
    Kshirsagar AA, Watson PJ, Tyler JA, Hall LD. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 28999.
  • 12
    Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, Gluer CC, Namba R, Majumdar S, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994; 192: 48591.
  • 13
    Tamez-Pena J, Barbu-McInnis M, Totterman S. Unsupervised definition of the tibia-femoral joint regions of the human knee and its applications to cartilage analysis. Proc SPIE 2006; 6144: 146575.
  • 14
    Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Kiefer B, Jackson R, Yu J, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 43341.
  • 15
    Duryea J, Neumann G, Brem MH, Koh W, Noorbakhsh F, Jackson RD, et al. Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 15: 48792.
  • 16
    Duryea J, Zaim S, Genant HK. New radiographic-based outcome measures for osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 10210.
  • 17
    Neumann G, Hunter D, Nevitt M, Chibnik LB, Kwoh K, Chen H, et al. Location specific radiographic joint space width for osteoarthritis progression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 7615.
  • 18
    Hunter DJ, Niu J, Zhang Y, Totterman S, Tamez J, Dabrowski C, et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 34956.
  • 19
    Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, Duryea J, Lynch JA, Miaux Y, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 3: 12832.
  • 20
    Kothari M, Guermazi A, von Ingersleben G, Miaux Y, Sieffert M, Block JE, et al. Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 156873.
  • 21
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494502.
  • 22
    Kraus VB, Vail TP, Worrell T, McDaniel G. A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 17305.
  • 23
    Cooke TD, Sled EA, Scudamore RA. Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1796801.
  • 24
    Snedecor G, Cochran W, Cox D. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames (IA): Iowa State University; 1989.
  • 25
    Le Graverand MP, Vignon EP, Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Piperno M, Buck R, et al. Head-to-head comparison of the Lyon schuss and fixed flexion radiographic techniques: long-term reproducibility in normal knees and sensitivity to change in osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 15626.