• 1
    Scott DL, Antoni C, Choy EH, van Riel PC. Joint counts in routine practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42: 91923.
  • 2
    Van der Heijde D, van 't Hof MA, van Riel PL, van de Putte LB. Development of a disease activity score based on judgement in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 53841.
  • 3
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 72735.
  • 4
    Pincus T, Segurado OG. Most visits of most patients with rheumatoid arthritis to most rheumatologists do not include a formal quantitative joint count. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 8202.
  • 5
    Abraham N, Blackmon D, Jackson JR, Bradley LA, Lorish CD, Alarcon GS. Use of self-administered joint counts in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res 1993; 6: 7881.
  • 6
    Prevoo ML, Kuper IH, van 't Hof MA, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Validity and reproducibility of self-administered joint counts: a prospective longitudinal follow-up study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 8415.
  • 7
    Barton JL, Criswell LA, Kaiser R, Chen YH, Schillinger D. Systematic review and metaanalysis of patient self-report versus trained assessor joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis [review]. J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 263541.
  • 8
    Kinkhoff AV, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Carette S. An experiment in reducing interobserver variability of the examination for joint tenderness. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 4924.
  • 9
    Lassere M, van der Heijde D, Johnson KR, Boers M, Edmonds J. Reliability of measures of disease activity and disease damage in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for smallest detectable difference, minimal clinically important difference, and analysis of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 892903.
  • 10
    Pincus T. Limitations of a quantitative swollen and tender joint count to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008; 66: 21623.
  • 11
    Scott DL, Choy EH, Greeves A, Isenberg D, Kassinor D, Rankin E, et al. Standardising joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1996; 15: 57982.
  • 12
    Walsh CA, Mullan RH, Minnock PB, Slattery C, Fitzgerald O, Bresnihan B. Consistency in assessing the disease activity score-28 in routine clinical practice [letter]. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1356.
  • 13
    Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localisation of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 96671.
  • 14
    Wakefield RJ, Green MJ, Marzo-Ortega H, Conaghan PG. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 3825.
  • 15
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 31524.
  • 16
    Van Riel PL, van Gestel AM, Scott DL, on behalf of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials. The EULAR handbook of clinical assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Alpen an den Rijn (The Netherlands): Van Zuiden Communications; 2000.
  • 17
    Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 24857.
  • 18
    Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, d'Agostino MA, Backhaus M, Bentin J, et al. Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems of synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 82833.
  • 19
    Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA, et al. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 6419.
  • 20
    Scheel AK, Hermann KA, Kahler E, Pasewaldt D, Fritz J, Hamm B, et al. A novel ultrasonographic scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 73343.
  • 21
    Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomson HS, Ostergaard M. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 95562.
  • 22
    Kirwan JR, Reeback J. Using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire to access disability in UK patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1983; 42: 21920.
  • 23
    Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn 1977; 18: 48191.
  • 24
    Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa. II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 5518.
  • 25
    Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 42349.
  • 26
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 15974.
  • 27
    Escalante A. What do self-administered joint counts tell us about patients with RA? Arthritis Rheum 1998; 11: 2809.
  • 28
    Figueroa F, Braun-Moscovici Y, Khanna D, Voon E, Gallardo L, Luinstra D, et al. Patient self-administered joint tenderness counts in rheumatoid arthritis are reliable and responsive to changes in disease activity. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 546.
  • 29
    Hanley JG, Moshier D, Sutton E, Weerasinghe S, Theriault D. Self-assessment of disease activity by patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 15318.
  • 30
    Levy G, Cheetham C, Cheatwood A, Burchette R. Validation of patient-reported joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis and the role of training. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 12615.
  • 31
    Wong AL, Wong WK, Harker J, Sterz M, Bulpitt K, Park G, et al. Patient self-report tender and swollen joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 255161.
  • 32
    Augustsson J, van Vollenhoven RF, Nilsson J, Teleman A, Petersson I, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, et al. Patient reported swollen and tender 28–joint counts accurately represent RA disease activity and can be used to calculate DAS28 on a group level [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58 Suppl: S1598.
  • 33
    Kavanaugh A, Weng HH, Chon Y, Lin S. Validation of a disease activity score using patient derived joint counts [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56 Suppl: S1806.
  • 34
    Radner H, Grisar J, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. The value of patient self assessment of joints in rheumatoid arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58 Suppl: S556.
  • 35
    Marhadour T, Jousse-Joulin S, Chales G, Grange L, Hacquard C, Loeuille D, et al. Reproducibility of joint swelling assessments in long-lasting rheumatoid arthritis: influence on Disease Activity Score–28 values (SEA-Repro study part 1). J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 9327.
  • 36
    Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, D'Agostino MA, Etchepare F, Wakefield R, et al. Ultrasonography versus clinical synovitis count for the calculation of the disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 Suppl: S0489.
  • 37
    Wells G, Becker JC, Teng J, Dougados M, Schiff M, Smolen J, et al. Validation of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria based on C-reactive protein against disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and comparison with the DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 83: 95460.
  • 38
    Castrejon I, Ortiz AM, Garcia-Vicuna R, Lopez-Bote JP, Humbria A, Carmona L, et al. Are the C-reactive protein values and erythrocyte sedimentation rate equivalent when estimating the 28-joint disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008; 26: 76975.
  • 39
    Radner H, Grisar J, Stamm T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Patients self-assessment of joint swelling and tenderness in rheumatoid arthritis: longitudinal validity and the role of training [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 Suppl: S120.