SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Guermazi A. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of subchondral bone and soft tissues in knee osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2009; 35: 55777.
  • 2
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 103949.
  • 3
    Brandt KD, Fife RS, Braunstein EM, Katz B. Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 13816.
  • 4
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494502.
  • 5
    Menkes CJ. Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991; 27: 135.
  • 6
    Eckstein F, Ateshian G, Burgkart R, Burstein D, Cicuttini F, Dardzinski B, et al. Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 97483.
  • 7
    Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP, Waterton JC, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14 Suppl A: 4675.
  • 8
    Guermazi A, Burstein D, Conaghan P, Eckstein F, Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau MP, Keen H, et al. Imaging in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008; 34: 64587.
  • 9
    Buck RJ, Wyman BT, Le Graverand MP, Wirth W, Eckstein F, for the A9001140 Investigators. An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 68090.
  • 10
    Jones G, Ding C, Scott F, Glisson M, Cicuttini F. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12: 16974.
  • 11
    Hellio Le Graverand MP, Buck RJ, Wyman BT, Vignon E, Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, et al. Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women: comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 117785.
  • 12
    Ding C, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Tibial subchondral bone size and knee cartilage defects: relevance to knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 47986.
  • 13
    Wang Y, Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial plateau bone area in osteoarthritic knees: a cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7: R68793.
  • 14
    Eckstein F, Buck RJ, Burstein D, Charles HC, Crim J, Hudelmaier M, et al. Precision of 3.0 tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 16838.
  • 15
    Wang Y, Ding C, Wluka AE, Davis S, Ebeling PR, Jones G, et al. Factors affecting progression of knee cartilage defects in normal subjects over 2 years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 7984.
  • 16
    Eckstein F, Maschek S, Wirth W, Hudelmaier M, Hitzl W, Wyman B, et al. One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 6749.
  • 17
    Hunter DJ, Niu J, Zhang Y, Totterman S, Tamez J, Dabrowski C, et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 34956.
  • 18
    Nevitt MC, Peterfy C, Guermazi A, Felson DT, Duryea J, Woodworth T, et al. Longitudinal performance evaluation and validation of fixed-flexion radiography of the knee for detection of joint space loss. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 151220.
  • 19
    Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, Duryea J, Lynch J, Miaux Y, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test–retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32: 12832.
  • 20
    Schneider E, NessAiver M, White D, Purdy D, Martin L, Fanella L, et al. The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance methods and results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 9941004.
  • 21
    Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15 Suppl A: 156.
  • 22
    Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA Jr, Wolfe F, Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995; 3 Suppl A: 370.
  • 23
    Eckstein F, Wirth W, Hudelmaier MI, Maschek S, Hitzl W, Wyman BT, et al. Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: R90.
  • 24
    Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Kiefer B, Jackson R, Yu J, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 43341.
  • 25
    Wirth W, Nevitt M, Hellio Le Graverand MP, Benichou O, Dreher D, Davies RY, et al. Sensitivity to change of cartilage morphometry using coronal FLASH, sagittal DESS, and coronal MPR DESS protocols: comparative data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 54754.
  • 26
    Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 143341.
  • 27
    Wirth W, Hellio Le Graverand MP, Wyman BT, Maschek S, Hudelmaier M, Hitzl W, et al. Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 2917.
  • 28
    Eckstein F, Kunz M, Schutzer M, Hudelmaier M, Jackson RD, Yu J, et al. Two year longitudinal change and test–retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 132632.
  • 29
    Wirth W, Eckstein F. A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008; 27: 73744.
  • 30
    Faber SC, Eckstein F, Lukasz S, Muhlbauer R, Hohe J, Englmeier KH, et al. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 14450.
  • 31
    Otterness IG, Eckstein F. Women have thinner cartilage and smaller joint surfaces than men after adjustment for body height and weight. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 66672.
  • 32
    Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hinterwimmer S, Hudelmaier M, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, et al. Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 282935.
  • 33
    Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990; 1: 436.
  • 34
    Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Cahue S, Marshall M, Sharma L. Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load. Calcif Tissue Int 2009; 84: 18694.
  • 35
    Reichenbach S, Yang M, Eckstein F, Niu J, Hunter DJ, McLennan CE, et al. Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 1439.
  • 36
    Eckstein F, Wirth W, Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Kwoh CK, Nelson DR, et al. Magnitude and regional distribution of cartilage loss associated with grades of joint space narrowing in radiographic osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 7608.
  • 37
    Bolbos RI, Zuo J, Banerjee S, Link TM, Ma CB, Li X, et al. Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3 T. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 11509.
  • 38
    Eckstein F, Faber S, Muhlbauer R, Hohe J, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, et al. Functional adaptation of human joints to mechanical stimuli. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 4450.
  • 39
    Brandt KD, Braunstein EM, Visco DM, O'Connor B, Heck D, Albrecht M. Anterior (cranial) cruciate ligament transection in the dog: a bona fide model of osteoarthritis, not merely of cartilage injury and repair. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 43646.
  • 40
    Frobell RB, Le Graverand MP, Buck R, Roos EM, Roos HP, Tamez-Pena J, et al. The acutely ACL injured knee assessed by MRI: changes in joint fluid, bone marrow lesions, and cartilage during the first year. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 1617.
  • 41
    Buck RJ, Wyman BT, Hellio Le Graverand MP, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Eckstein F. Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss: comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 117785.
  • 42
    Eckstein F, Guermazi A, Roemer FW. Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 65573.