SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Savigny P, Watson P, Underwood M. Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2009; 338: b1805.
  • 2
    Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2010; 375: 91623.
  • 3
    Borkan JM, Koes B, Reis S, Cherkin DC. A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain: reexamining priorities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 19926.
  • 4
    Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 84856.
  • 5
    Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, Koes BW, Croft PR, Hay E. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24: 18191.
  • 6
    Lamb SE, Lall R, Hansen Z, Withers EJ, Griffiths FE, Szczepura A, et al. Design considerations in a clinical trial of a cognitive behavioural intervention for the management of low back pain in primary care: Back Skills Training Trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 14.
  • 7
    Hansen Z, Daykin A, Lamb SE. A cognitive-behavioural programme for the management of low back pain in primary care: a description and justification of the intervention used in the Back Skills Training Trial (BeST; ISRCTN 54717854). Physiotherapy 2010; 96: 8794.
  • 8
    Lamb SE, Lall R, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain: the Back Skills Training (BeST) trial. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14: 1253.
  • 9
    Roland M, Waddell G, Klaber Moffett J, Burton K, Main C. The back book. 2nd ed. Norwich: The Stationery Office; 2002.
  • 10
    Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 1414.
  • 11
    Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR. Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 110412.
  • 12
    Kent P, Keating JL, Leboeuf-Yde C. Research methods for subgrouping low back pain. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 62.
  • 13
    United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004; 329: 1377.
  • 14
    Parsons S, Carnes D, Pincus T, Foster N, Breen A, Vogel S, et al. Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 34.
  • 15
    Pincus T, Vogel S, Burton AK, Santos R, Field AP. Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: a systematic review and synthesis of current evidence. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 39994010.
  • 16
    Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52: 15768.
  • 17
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 36170.
  • 18
    Nicholas MK. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 15363.
  • 19
    Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 22033.
  • 20
    Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL. Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 923.
  • 21
    Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 2006; 332: 1080.
  • 22
    Lagakos SW. The challenge of subgroup analyses: reporting without distorting. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 16679.
  • 23
    Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5: 156.
  • 24
    Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 10649.
  • 25
    Matthews JN, Altman DG. Interaction 3: how to examine heterogeneity. BMJ 1996; 313: 862.
  • 26
    Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 3rd ed. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
  • 27
    Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002; 21: 291730.
  • 28
    Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, Brinkhaus B, Reinhold T, Wruck K, et al. Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 164: 48796.
  • 29
    Underwood MR, Morton V, Farrin A. Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset [ISRCTN32683578]. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 1297302.
  • 30
    Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Ichikawa L, Avins AL, Barlow WE, Khalsa PS, et al. Characteristics of patients with chronic back pain who benefit from acupuncture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 114.
  • 31
    Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 22936.
  • 32
    Matthews JN, Altman DG. Statistics notes. Interaction 2: compare effect sizes not P values. BMJ 1996; 313: 808.
  • 33
    Kent DM, Rothwell PM, Ioannidis JP, Altman DG, Hayward RA. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal. Trials 2010; 11: 85.
  • 34
    Pincus T, Miles C, Froud R, Underwood M, Carnes D, Taylor S. Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 14.
  • 35
    Tu YK, Gunnell D, Gilthorpe MS. Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and suppression effects are the same phenomenon: the reversal paradox. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2008; 5: 2.
  • 36
    Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Baron G, Le Henanff A, Coudeyre E, Rozenberg S, et al. Fear-avoidance beliefs about back pain in patients with subacute low back pain. Pain 2006; 124: 30511.
  • 37
    George SZ, Fritz JM, Childs JD. Investigation of elevated fear-avoidance beliefs for patients with low back pain: a secondary analysis involving patients enrolled in physical therapy clinical trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: 508.
  • 38
    Stewart LA, Parmar MK. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet 1993; 341: 41822.
  • 39
    Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000; 25: 31003.
  • 40
    Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use [published erratum appears in Spine 1999;24:418]. Spine 1998; 23: 200313.
  • 41
    Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Victor N, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain: protocol of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Trials 2010; 11: 90.
  • 42
    The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; 24 Suppl: 9160.