SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 100719.
  • 2
    Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 112731.
  • 3
    Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37: 37881.
  • 4
    Huskisson EC, Wojtulewski JA, Berry H, Scott J, Hart FD, Balme HW. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with fenoprofen: comparison with aspirin. Br Med J 1974; 1: 17680.
  • 5
    Berry H, Huskisson EC. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Trials J 1972; 4: 135.
  • 6
    Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 11726.
  • 7
    Burckhardt CS, Jones KD. Adult measures of pain: The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Verbal Descriptive Scale (VDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and West Haven-Yale Multidisciplinary Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: S96104.
  • 8
    Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 10224.
  • 9
    Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 17584.
  • 10
    Joyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes VF, Mason RM. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1975; 8: 41520.
  • 11
    Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain 2003; 4: 40714.
  • 12
    Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1979; 38: 560.
  • 13
    Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62: 98993.
  • 14
    Clarke PR, Spear FG. Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well-being. [abstract]. Bull Br Psychol Soc 1964; 17: 18A.
  • 15
    Woodforde JM, Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res 1972; 16: 1738.
  • 16
    Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 1981; 10: 2418.
  • 17
    Wolfe F, Michaud K. Assessment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: minimal clinically significant difference, predictors, and the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 167483.
  • 18
    Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 92732.
  • 19
    Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005; 30: 13314.
  • 20
    Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 1993; 55: 195203.
  • 21
    Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs 2001; 2: 3846.
  • 22
    Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 14958.
  • 23
    Johnson C. Measuring pain. Visual analog scale versus numeric pain scale: what is the difference? J Chiropr Med 2005; 4: 434.
  • 24
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005; 113: 919.
  • 25
    Jensen MP, Karoly P, O'Riordan EF, Bland F Jr, Burns RS. The subjective experience of acute pain. Clin J Pain 1989; 5: 1539.
  • 26
    Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int 1985; 5: 1458.
  • 27
    De C Williams AC, Davies HT, Chadury Y. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000; 85: 45763.
  • 28
    Hawker GA, Davis AM, French MR, Cibere J, Jordan JM, March L, et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure: an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 40914.
  • 29
    Hush JM, Refshauge KM, Sullivan G, De Souza L, McAuley JH. Do numerical rating scales and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire capture changes that are meaningful to patients with persistent back pain? Clin Rehabil 2010; 24: 64857.
  • 30
    Burckhardt CS. The use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in assessing arthritis pain. Pain 1984; 19: 30514.
  • 31
    Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1: 27799.
  • 32
    Escalante A, Lichtenstein MJ, White K, Rios N, Hazuda HP. A method for scoring the pain map of the McGill pain questionnaire for use in epidemiologic studies. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 35866.
  • 33
    Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987; 30: 1917.
  • 34
    Menezes CL, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 93443.
  • 35
    Boureau F, Luu M, Doubrere JF, Gay C. Construction of a questionnaire for the self-evaluation of pain using a list of qualifiers. Therapie 1984; 39: 11929.
  • 36
    Geissner E. Measuring pain via questionnaires: several results concerning the validity of a modified German version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Z Klin Psychol 1988; 17: 33440.
  • 37
    Kiss I, Muller H, Abel M. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: German version. Pain 1987; 29: 195207.
  • 38
    Stein C, Mendl G. The German counterpart to McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1988; 32: 2515.
  • 39
    Kim HS, Schwartz-Barcott D, Holter IM, Lorensen M. Developing a translation of the McGill pain questionnaire for cross-cultural comparison: an example from Norway. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21: 4216.
  • 40
    Van Lankveld WF, van Pad Bosch PF, van de Putte LF, van der Staak CF, Naring G. Pain in rheumatoid arthritis measured with the visual analogue scale and the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1992; 136: 116670.
  • 41
    Maiani G, Sanavio E. Semantics of pain in Italy: the Italian version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1985; 22: 399405.
  • 42
    Hasegawa M, Hattori S, Mishima M, Matsumoto IF, Kimura T, Baba Y, et al. The McGill Pain Questionnaire, Japanese version, reconsidered: confirming the theoretical structure. Pain Res Manag 2001; 6: 17380.
  • 43
    Ketovuori H, Pontinen PJ. A pain vocabulary in Finnish: the Finnish pain questionnaire. Pain 1981; 11: 24753.
  • 44
    Lazaro C, Bosch F, Torrubia R, Banos JE. The development of a Spanish questionnaire for assessing pain: preliminary data concerning reliability and validity. Euro J Psychol Assess 1994; 10: 14551.
  • 45
    Hui YL, Chen AC. Analysis of headache in a Chinese patient population. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi 1989; 27: 138.
  • 46
    Van der Kloot WA, Oostendorp RA, van der Meij J, van den HJ. The Dutch version of the McGill pain questionnaire: a reliable pain questionnaire. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1995; 139: 66973. In Dutch.
  • 47
    Aboud FE, Hiwot MG, Arega A, Molla M, Samson SN, Seyoum N, et al. The McGill Pain Questionnaire in Amharic: Zwai Health Center patients' reports on the experience of pain. Ethiop Med J 2003; 41: 4561.
  • 48
    Bartko D, Kondas M, Janco S. Quantification of pain in neurology. Cesk Neurol Neurochir 1984; 47: 11321.
  • 49
    Kuguoglu S, Aslan FE, Olgun N. Turkish version of the McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Form (MPQF). Agri-Istanbul 2003; 15: 4751.
  • 50
    Goncalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, Ferreira PL, Gil J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) measure for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 105861.
  • 51
    Pimenta CA, Teixeiro MJ. Proposal to adapt the McGill Pain Questionnaire into Portuguese. Rev Esc Enferm USP 1996; 30: 47383. In Portuguese.
  • 52
    Varoli FK, Pedrazzi V. Adapted version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. Braz Dent J 2006; 17: 32835.
  • 53
    Torgerson WS. Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley and Son; 1958.
  • 54
    Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE. Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 1985; 22: 131.
  • 55
    Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain 2008; 139: 14657.
  • 56
    Love A, Leboeuf C, Crisp TC. Chiropractic chronic low back pain sufferers and self-report assessment methods. Part I. A reliability study of the Visual Analogue Scale, the Pain Drawing and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1989; 12: 215.
  • 57
    Roche PA, Klestov AC, Heim HM. Description of stable pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6 year study. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 17338.
  • 58
    Papageorgiou AC, Badley EM. The quality of pain in arthritis: the words patients use to describe overall pain and pain in individual joints at rest and on movement. J Rheumatol 1989; 16: 10612.
  • 59
    Katz J, Clairoux M, Kavanagh BP, Roger S, Nierenberg H, Redahan C, et al. Pre-emptive lumbar epidural anesthesia reduces postoperative pain and patient-controlled morphine consumption after lower abdominal surgery. Pain 1994; 59: 395403.
  • 60
    Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg MC. Determinants of pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: effect of demographic and psychosocial variables using 3 pain measures. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 178592.
  • 61
    Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Dhottar H, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Quantifying the pain experience in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Pain Res Manag 2010; 15: 2248.
  • 62
    Jenkinson C, Carroll D, Egerton M, Frankland T, McQuay H, Nagle C. Comparison of the sensitivity to change of long and short form pain measures. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 3537.
  • 63
    ICOAP User's Guide. Osteoarthritis Research Society International. 2011. URL: http://www.oarsi.org/pdfs/pain_indexes/ICOAP_USERS_GUIDE_07072010.pdf.
  • 64
    Rasmussen PV, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS, Bach FW. Symptoms and signs in patients with suspected neuropathic pain. Pain 2004; 110: 4619.
  • 65
    Dworkin RH, Corbin AE, Young JP Jr, Sharma U, LaMoreaux L, Bockbrader H, et al. Pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 2003; 60: 127483.
  • 66
    Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, Holden RR, Weaver DF, Houlden RL. Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 132434.
  • 67
    Hsieh LL, Kuo CH, Yen MF, Chen TH. A randomized controlled clinical trial for low back pain treated by acupressure and physical therapy. Prev Med 2004; 39: 16876.
  • 68
    Knotek P, Solcova I, Zalsky M. Czech version of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire: restandardization. Bolest 2002; 5: 16972.
  • 69
    Perkins FM, Werner MU, Persson F, Holte K, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Development and validation of a brief, descriptive Danish pain questionnaire (BDDPQ). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 48690.
  • 70
    Najafi-Ghezeljeh T, Ekman I, Nikravesh MY, Emami A. Adaptation and validation of the Iranian version of Angina Pectoris characteristics questionnaire. Int J Nurs Pract 2008; 14: 4706.
  • 71
    Georgoudis G, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. The development and validation of a Greek version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 2000; 4: 27581.
  • 72
    Georgoudis G, Oldham JA, Watson PJ. Reliability and sensitivity measures of the Greek version of the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 2001; 5: 10918.
  • 73
    Sloman R, Rosen G, Rom M, Shir Y. Nurses' assessment of pain in surgical patients. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52: 12532.
  • 74
    Ahuja S, Saluja V, Bhattacharya A. A Modified Short form McGill Pain Questionnaire for evaluation of post-operative pain and behavioural response to pain relief. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 1999; 15: 14953.
  • 75
    Lee HF, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Maher CG, Halaki M, Bae SS. Development and psychometric testing of Korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1976; 31: 18415.
  • 76
    Lee MC, Essoka G. Patient's perception of pain: comparison between Korean-American and Euro-American obstetric patients. J Cult Divers 1998; 5: 2937.
  • 77
    Ljunggren AE, Strand LI, Johnsen TB. Development of the Norwegian short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (NSF-MPQ). Adv Physiother 2007; 9: 16980.
  • 78
    Burckhardt CS, Bjelle A. A Swedish version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol 1994; 23: 7781.
  • 79
    Kitisomprayoonkul W, Klaphajone J, Kovindha A. Thai Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89: 84653.
  • 80
    Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 10837.
  • 81
    Huskisson EC. Current practice in rheumatology. Practitioner 1983; 227: 1087.
  • 82
    Grushka M, Sessle BJ. Applicability of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to the differentiation of 'toothache' pain. Pain 1984; 19: 4957.
  • 83
    Hunter M. The Headache Scale: a new approach to the assessment of headache pain based on pain descriptions. Pain 1983; 16: 36173.
  • 84
    Leavitt JW. “Science” enters the birthing room: obstetrics in America since the eighteenth century. J Am Hist 1983; 70: 281304.
  • 85
    Grafton KV, Foster NE, Wright CC. Test-retest reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 7382.
  • 86
    Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Bogen B, Ask T, Johnsen TB. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change. Eur J Pain 2008; 12: 91725.
  • 87
    Birch S, Jamison RN. Controlled trial of Japanese acupuncture for chronic myofascial neck pain: assessment of specific and nonspecific effects of treatment. Clin J Pain 1998; 14: 24855.
  • 88
    Ruoff GE, Rosenthal N, Jordan D, Karim R, Kamin M. Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets for the treatment of chronic lower back pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 112341.
  • 89
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain 2009; 144: 3542.
  • 90
    Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 13349.
  • 91
    Elliott AM, Smith BH, Smith WC, Chambers WA. Changes in chronic pain severity over time: the Chronic Pain Grade as a valid measure. Pain 2000; 88: 3038.
  • 92
    Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet 1999; 354: 124852.
  • 93
    Von Korff M, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Assessing headache severity. Neurology 1994; 44: S406.
  • 94
    Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 1997; 71: 1417.
  • 95
    Salaffi FF, Stancati AF, Grassi W. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Rheumatol 2006; 25: 61931.
  • 96
    Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le RL. Graded chronic pain status: an epidemiologic evaluation. Pain 1990; 40: 27991.
  • 97
    Turk DC, Rudy TE. Towards a comprehensive assessment of chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 23749.
  • 98
    Turk DC, Rudy TE. Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56: 2338.
  • 99
    Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23: 34556.
  • 100
    Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Tu W, Wu J, Kroenke K. Comparative responsiveness of pain outcome measures among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Med Care 2010; 48: 100714.
  • 101
    Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR. Does questionnaire structure influence response in postal surveys? J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 106.
  • 102
    Penny KI, Purves AM, Smith BH, Chambers WA, Smith WC. Relationship between the chronic pain grade and measures of physical, social and psychological well-being. Pain 1999; 79: 2759.
  • 103
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. Boston: The Health Institute; 1994.
  • 104
    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 24763.
  • 105
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 47383.
  • 106
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version two of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric; 2000.
  • 107
    Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 90312.
  • 108
    Shiely JC, Bayliss MS, Keller SD, Tsai C, Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey annotated bibliography: the first edition (1988-1995). Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1996.
  • 109
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
  • 110
    Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 135966.
  • 111
    Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104: 7716. In Spanish.
  • 112
    Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. SF-36 Halsoenkat: Svensk manual och tolkningsguide (Swedish manual and interpretation guide). Gothenburg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital; 1994.
  • 113
    Apolone G, Cifani S, Liberati MC, Mosconi P. Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-36. Traduzione e validazione della versione italiana: risultati del progetto IQOLA. Metodologia e Didattica Clinica 1997; 5: 8694.
  • 114
    Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 1992.
  • 115
    Dupuy HJ. The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg JF, Elinson JA, editors. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le Jacq; 1984. p. 17083.
  • 116
    Hulka BS, Cassel JC. The AAFP-UNC study of the organization, utilization, and assessment of primary medical care. Am J Public Health 1973; 63: 494501.
  • 117
    Patrick DL, Bush JW, Chen MM. Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Serv Res 1973; 8: 22845.
  • 118
    Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 107683.
  • 119
    Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 27380.
  • 120
    Koh ET, Leong KP, Tsou IY, Lim VH, Pong LY, Chong SY, et al. The reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Chinese version of SF-36 in oriental patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 10238.
  • 121
    Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 1604.
  • 122
    Bombardier C, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Hawker GA, Wright J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995; 33: AS13144.
  • 123
    Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B, Mannoni A, Fioravanti A, Caporali R, et al. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 55160.
  • 124
    Hawker GA, French MR, Elkayam JG, Davis AM. Unpredictability of intermittent knee OA pain: impact on pain, function, and mood [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62 Suppl 10: S2845.
  • 125
    Kessler S, Grammozis A, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. The Intermittent and Constant Pain Score (ICOAP): a questionnaire to assess pain in patients with gonarthritis. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 149: 226. In German.
  • 126
    Maillefert JF, Kloppenburg M, Fernandes L, Punzi L, Gunther KP, Martin Mola E, et al. Multi-language translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the OARSI/OMERACT measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 12936.
  • 127
    Hawker GA, Stewart L, French MR, Cibere J, Jordan JM, March L, et al. Understanding the pain experience in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 41522.
  • 128
    Hawker GA, Davis A, Lohmander S. Responsiveness of the new OARSI-OMERACT OA pain and function measures [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 Suppl 3: 350.
  • 129
    Davis AM, Lohmander LS, Wong R, Venkataramanan V, Hawker GA. Evaluating the responsiveness of the ICOAP following hip or knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 10435.