SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 73755.
  • 2
    Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement: a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Nottingham Health Profile. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 6006.
  • 3
    Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Kilgus DJ, Thomas BJ, et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 63945.
  • 4
    Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 390: 16372.
  • 5
    Frihagen F, Grotle M, Madsen JE, Wyller TB, Mowinckel P, Nordsletten L. Outcome after femoral neck fractures: a comparison of Harris Hip Score, Eq-5d and Barthel Index. Injury 2008; 39: 114756.
  • 6
    Hoeksma HL, van den Ende CH, Ronday HK, Heering A, Breedveld FC. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 9358.
  • 7
    Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris Hip Score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 7037.
  • 8
    Soderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris Hip Score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 384: 18997.
  • 9
    Kirmit L, Karatosun V, Unver B, Bakirhan S, Sen A, Gocen Z. The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 65961.
  • 10
    Shi HY, Mau LW, Chang JK, Wang JW, Chiu HC. Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 105360.
  • 11
    Soderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2000; 71: 133.
  • 12
    Klassbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: an extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 2003; 32: 4651.
  • 13
    Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
  • 14
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 183340.
  • 15
    Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 5519.
  • 16
    Gossec L, Paternotte S, Maillefert JF, Combescure C, Conaghan PG, Davis AM, et al. The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients: report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force on Total Joint Replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 14754.
  • 17
    De Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Favejee M, Roos EM, et al. Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 1049.
  • 18
    Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 5229.
  • 19
    Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, Petersen J, Holmich P. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 118696.
  • 20
    Veenhof C, Bijlsma JW, van den Ende CH, van Dijk GM, Pisters MF, Dekker J. Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 48092.
  • 21
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 18590.
  • 22
    Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, et al. The use of the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 10104.
  • 23
    Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 893900.
  • 24
    Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 33944.
  • 25
    Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP. The Oxford Hip and Knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 2418.
  • 26
    Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 4138.
  • 27
    Uesugi Y, Makimoto K, Fujita K, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford Hip Score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14: 359.
  • 28
    Wylde V, Blom AW, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 2106.
  • 29
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 11259.
  • 30
    Field RE, Cronin MD, Singh PJ. The Oxford Hip Scores for primary and revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 61822.
  • 31
    Fitzpatrick R, Morris R, Hajat S, Reeves B, Murray DW, Hannen D, et al. The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 14650.
  • 32
    Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 103741.
  • 33
    McMurray R, Heaton J, Sloper P, Nettleton S. Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford Hip Score in mixed methods. Qual Health Care 1999; 8: 22833.
  • 34
    Wylde V, Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. The Oxford Hip Score: the patient's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 66.
  • 35
    Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, Dhert WJ, van Langelaan EJ, Bulstra SK, et al. The “Oxford Heup Score”: the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 20411.
  • 36
    Naal FD, Sieverding M, Impellizzeri FM, von Knoch F, Mannion AF, Leunig M. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford Hip Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 9527.
  • 37
    Delaunay C, Epinette JA, Dawson J, Murray D, Jolles BM. Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 Hip score to the French speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95: 8999.
  • 38
    Fitzpatrick R, Norquist JM, Jenkinson C, Reeves BC, Morris RW, Murray DW, et al. A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 3318.
  • 39
    Garbuz DS, Xu M, Sayre EC. Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index and the Oxford 12-item Hip Score. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 9981004.
  • 40
    Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 8018.
  • 41
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996; 5: 818.
  • 42
    Arden NK, Kiran A, Judge A, Biant LC, Javaid MK, Murray DW, et al. What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 15562.
  • 43
    Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: validation—value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65: 859.
  • 44
    Lequesne M. Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991; 20 Suppl 2: 4854.
  • 45
    Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 77981.
  • 46
    Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall A, Dick W, et al. Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Osteoarthritis Index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional Index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998; 6: 7986.
  • 47
    Dawson J, Linsell L, Doll H, Zondervan K, Rose P, Carr A, et al. Assessment of the Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip in an elderly population. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 85460.
  • 48
    Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, Berdah L, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, et al. Requirement for total hip arthroplasty: an outcome measure of hip osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 85561.
  • 49
    Faucher M, Poiraudeau S, Lefevre-Colau MM, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. Algo-functional assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the test–retest reliability and construct validity of the WOMAC and Lequesne indexes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 60210.
  • 50
    Lequesne MG, Samson M. Indices of severity in osteoarthritis for weight bearing joints. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991; 27: 168.
  • 51
    Basaran S, Guzel R, Seydaoglu G, Guler-Uysal F. Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 74956.
  • 52
    Bae SC, Lee HS, Yun HR, Kim TH, Yoo DH, Kim SY. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne osteoarthritis indices for clinical research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 74650.
  • 53
    Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 9029.
  • 54
    DeLullo JA, Thomas E, Cooney TE, McConnell SJ, Sanders JO. Femoral remodeling may influence patient outcomes in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 457: 16370.
  • 55
    Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A: 20815.