• 1
    Quesada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 Suppl: 6973.
  • 2
    Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 5665.
  • 3
    Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Roy AG, Lusignan D. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 2006; 16 Suppl 4: 7381.
  • 4
    Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 12331.
  • 5
    Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 592600.
  • 6
    Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 6671.
  • 7
    Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA. The John Charnley Award. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 32636.
  • 8
    Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB. Patient requests and expectations: definitions and clinical applications. Med Care 1984; 22: 6815.
  • 9
    Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 38796.
  • 10
    Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 12739.
  • 11
    Ackerman D, Murphy T, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Mabry T, Sierra RJ. Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty [abstract]. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 318.
  • 12
    Murphy TP, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Mabry TM, Sierra RJ. Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 730.
  • 13
    Saleh KJ, Mulhall KJ, Bershadsky B, Ghomrawi HM, White LE, Buyea CM, et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale: use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 198594.
  • 14
    Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, et al. Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 42431.
  • 15
    Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Bershadsky B, Saleh KJ. Functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty revision: new observations on the dimensional nature of outcome. J Orthop Surg Res 2007; 2: 25.
  • 16
    MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivariate Behav Res 2001; 36: 61137.
  • 17
    Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 3543.