SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH outcome measure user's manual. 3rd ed. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2011.
  • 2
    Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 6028.
  • 3
    Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, and the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 103846.
  • 4
    Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 161.
  • 5
    Germann G, Harth A, Wind G. Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Unfallchirurg 2003; 105: 139. In German.
  • 6
    Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 81928.
  • 7
    Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 62332.
  • 8
    Cano S, Barrett L, Zajicek J, Hobart JC. Beyond the reach of traditional analyses: using Rasch to evaluate the DASH in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 21422.
  • 9
    Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 13707.
  • 10
    Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 44.
  • 11
    Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm and Hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 104351.
  • 12
    Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 20815.
  • 13
    Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 33541.
  • 14
    Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V. Measuring the whole or parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 12846.
  • 15
    Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 11.
  • 16
    Huisstede BM, Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW. Is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E1308.
  • 17
    Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Does the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system only measure disability due to injuries to the upper limb? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 5247.
  • 18
    Raven EE, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Montfoort DO, Poll RG, Blankevoort L, et al. Construct validity and reliability of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 23348.
  • 19
    Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 3918.
  • 20
    Staples MP, Forbes A, Green S, Buchbinder R. Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 16370.
  • 21
    Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 100818.
  • 22
    Slobogean GP, Noonan VK, O'Brien PJ. The reliability and validity of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index, and Short Form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 3428.
  • 23
    Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 15462.
  • 24
    Angst F, John M, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Flury M, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 7382.
  • 25
    MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the Short Form-36, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25: 33040.
  • 26
    MacDermid JC, Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 2004; 17: 1823.
  • 27
    Angst F, John M, Goldhahn J, Herren DB, Pap G, Aeschlimann A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after resection interposition arthroplasty of the thumb saddle joint. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 20513.
  • 28
    Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 9206.
  • 29
    Beaton DE, Eerd D, Smith P, van der Velde G, Cullen K, Kennedy CA, et al. Minimal change is sensitive, less specific, to recovery: a diagnostic testing approach to interpretability. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 48796.
  • 30
    Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4: 1439.
  • 31
    Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, Mannion AF, Roach KE, Siebertz D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 8792.
  • 32
    Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder: a cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 88290.
  • 33
    Tveita EK, Sanvik L, Ekeberg OM, Juel NG, Bautz-Holter E. Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 103.
  • 34
    Tveita EK, Ekeberg OM, Juel NG, Bautz-Holter E. Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 161.
  • 35
    Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Tveita EK, Keller A, Juel NG, Brox JI. Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 68.
  • 36
    Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Keller A, Tveita EK, Juel NG, Brox JI. A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 57584.
  • 37
    Beaton DE, Richards RR. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 56572.
  • 38
    Roddey TS, Olson SL, Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Hanten W. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: single-administration reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 75968.
  • 39
    Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Olson SL. The measurement level and trait-specific reliability of 4 scales of shoulder functioning: an empiric investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 155865.
  • 40
    Williams JW Jr, Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL. Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 72732.
  • 41
    Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 107989.
  • 42
    MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachin K. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 12.
  • 43
    Cloke DJ, Lynn SE, Watson H, Steen IN, Purdy S, Williams JR. A comparison of functional, patient-based scores in subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 3804.
  • 44
    Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 34752.
  • 45
    Sallay PI, Reed L. The measurement of normative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 6227.
  • 46
    Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 58794.
  • 47
    Razmjou H, Bean A, van Osnabrugge V, MacDermid JC, Holtby R. Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 26.
  • 48
    Yoo JC, Koh KH, Park WH, Park JC, Kim SM, Yoon YC. The outcome of ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection in calcific tendinitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 596600.
  • 49
    Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 296303.
  • 50
    Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Alviti F, Castagna A. Italian version of ASES questionnaire for shoulder assessment: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Musculoskelet Surg 2010; 94 Suppl: S8590.
  • 51
    Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 200611.
  • 52
    Goldhahn J, Angst F, Drerup S, Pap G, Simmen BR, Mannion AF. Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder form into German. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 24854.
  • 53
    Cook KF, Roddey TS, Olson SL, Gartsman GM, Valenzuela FF, Hanten WP. Reliability by surgical status of self-reported outcomes in patients who have shoulder pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32: 33646.
  • 54
    Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 217885.
  • 55
    Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 214: 1604.
  • 56
    Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 35561.
  • 57
    Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 15764.
  • 58
    Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C. The Constant Score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 12833.
  • 59
    Rocourt MH, Radlinger L, Kalberer F, Sanavi S, Schmid NS, Leunig M, et al. Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 3649.
  • 60
    Oh JH, Jo KH, Kim WS, Gong HS, Han SG, Kim YH. Comparative evaluation of the measurement properties of various shoulder outcome instruments. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 11618.
  • 61
    Dawson J, Hill G, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment: medium-term results of an observational study of shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 87782.
  • 62
    Vas J, Ortega C, Olmo V, Perez-Fernandez F, Hernandez L, Medina I, et al. Single-point acupuncture and physiotherapy for the treatment of painful shoulder: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 88793.
  • 63
    O'Connor DA, Chipchase LS, Tomlinson J, Krishnan J. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: responsiveness of disease-specific and health-related quality of life outcome measures. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 83640.
  • 64
    Christie A, Hagen KB, Mowinckel P, Dagfinrud H. Methodological properties of six shoulder disability measures in patients with rheumatic diseases referred for shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 8995.
  • 65
    Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Zeichen J, Bosch U. Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair: early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 4326.
  • 66
    Razmjou H, Bean A, Macdermid JC, van Osnabrugge V, Travers N, Holtby R. Convergent validity of the Constant-Murley outcome measure in patients with rotator cuff disease. Physiother Can 2008; 60: 729.
  • 67
    Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability: the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 76472.
  • 68
    Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA. A practical tool for evaluation of function: the Simple Shoulder Test. In: Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, editors. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1993. p. 54559.
  • 69
    Godfrey J, Hamman R, Lowenstein S, Briggs K, Kocher M. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Simple Shoulder Test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 2607.
  • 70
    Roy JS, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, Athwal GS. The Simple Shoulder Test is responsive in assessing change following shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 41321.
  • 71
    MacDermid JC, Drosdowech D, Faber K. Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 40714.
  • 72
    Romeo AA, Mazzocca A, Hang DW, Shott S, Bach BR. Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; 427: 10714.
  • 73
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 593600.
  • 74
    Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford Shoulder Score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 11923.
  • 75
    Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C. The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 5316.
  • 76
    Dawson J, Hill G, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Comparison of clinical and patient-based measures to assess medium-term outcomes following shoulder surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 5139.
  • 77
    Allom R, Colegate-Stone T, Gee M, Ismail M, Sinha J. Outcome analysis of surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff: a comparison of subjective and objective scoring tools. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 36773.
  • 78
    Rees JL, Dawson J, Hand GC, Cooper C, Judge A, Price AJ, et al. The use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 110711.
  • 79
    Baker P, Nanda R, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A. A comparison of the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 3741.
  • 80
    Croft P, Pope D, Zonca M, O'Neill T, Silman A. Measurement of shoulder disability: results of a validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 1994; 53: 5258.
  • 81
    Van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, Koes BW, Deville W, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 827.
  • 82
    Van der Heijden GJ, Leffers P, Bouter LM. Shoulder Disability Questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 2938.
  • 83
    Paul A, Lewis M, Shadforth MF, Croft PR, van der Windt DA, Hay EM. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 12939.
  • 84
    Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Decker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 58: 53040.
  • 85
    De Winter A, van der Heijden GJ, Scholten RJ, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM. The Shoulder Disability Questionnaire differentiated well between high and low disability levels in patients in primary care, in a cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 115663.
  • 86
    Ozsahin M, Akgun K, Aktas I, Kurtais Y. Adaptation of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 2415.
  • 87
    Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, le Cessie S, Vlieland TP. Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomised controlled study. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 35568.
  • 88
    Ryans I, Montgomery A, Galway R, Kernohan WG, McKane R. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular triamcinolone and/or physiotherapy in shoulder capsulitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44: 52935.
  • 89
    Eyigor C, Eyigor S, Korkmaz OK. Are intra-articular corticosteroid injections better than conventional TENS in treatment of rotator cuff tendinitis in the short run? A randomized study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010; 46: 31524.
  • 90
    Geraets JJ, Goossens ME, de Groot IJ, de Bruijn CP, de Bie RA, Dinant GJ, et al. Effectiveness of a graded exercise program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints. Austr J Physiother 2005; 51: 8794.
  • 91
    Kirkley A, Werstine R, Ratjek A, Griffin S. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder: long-term evaluation. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 5563.
  • 92
    Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S, Flury MP, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers. Orthopade 2010; 39: 7118. In German.
  • 93
    Rouleau DM, Faber K, MacDermid JC. Systematic review of patient-administered shoulder functional scores on instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 11218.
  • 94
    Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 110920.
  • 95
    Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Hofstaetter SG, Wurnig C, Huber W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 78796.
  • 96
    Salomonsson B, Ahlstrom S, Dalen N, Lillkrona U. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a Swedish translation. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 2338.