SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Jones JB, Snyder CF, Wu AW. Issues in the design of internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 140717.
  • 2
    Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 83343.
  • 3
    Donaldson M. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: benefits, challenges and next steps. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2006; 6: 8795.
  • 4
    Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 302734.
  • 5
    Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F. Toward a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 222030.
  • 6
    Yazici Y, Bergman M, Pincus T. Time to score quantitative rheumatoid arthritis measures: 28-joint count, disease activity score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 6039.
  • 7
    Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M. A practical guide to scoring a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores in 10-20 seconds for use in standard clinical care, without rulers, calculators, websites or computers. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007; 21: 75587.
  • 8
    Pincus T, Maclean R, Yazici Y, Harrington JT. Quantitative measurement of patient status in the regular care of patients with rheumatic diseases over 25 years as a continuous quality improvement activity, rather than traditional research. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 6981.
  • 9
    Pincus T, Yazici Y, Sokka T. Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007; 21: 60128.
  • 10
    Salaffi F, Gasparini S, Grassi W. The use of computer touch-screen technology for the collection of patient-reported outcome data in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with standardized paper questionnaires. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: 45968.
  • 11
    Sokka T, Haugeberg G, Pincus T. Assessment of quality of rheumatoid arthritis care requires joint count and/or patient questionnaire data not found in a usual medical record: examples from studies of premature mortality, changes in clinical status between 1985 and 2000, and a QUEST-RA global perspective. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 8697.
  • 12
    Pincus T, Brooks RH, Callahan LF. Prediction of long-term mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to simple questionnaire and joint count measures. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 2634.
  • 13
    Pincus T, Swearingen CJ, Bergman MJ, Colglazier CL, Kaell AT, Kunath AM, et al. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire): agreement with DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) activity categories, scored in five versus more than ninety seconds. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 1819.
  • 14
    Harrington J. The uses of disease activity scoring and the physician global assessment of disease activity for managing rheumatoid arthritis in rheumatology practice. J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 9259.
  • 15
    Larsson BW. Touch-screen versus paper-and-pen questionnaires: effects on patients' evaluations of quality of care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2006; 19: 32838.
  • 16
    Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, et al. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 9981007.
  • 17
    Dixon S, Bunker T, Chan D. Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89: 68991.
  • 18
    Clark K, Bardwell WA, Arsenault T, DeTeresa R, Loscalzo M. Implementing touch-screen technology to enhance recognition of distress. Psychooncology 2009; 18: 82230.
  • 19
    De Bree R, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Keizer AL, Houffelaar A, Leemans CR. Touch screen computer-assisted health-related quality of life and distress data collection in head and neck cancer patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33: 13842.
  • 20
    Fann JR, Berry DL, Wolpin S, Austin-Seymour M, Bush N, Halpenny B, et al. Depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 administered on a touch screen computer. Psychooncology 2009; 18: 1422.
  • 21
    Harrington JT, Newman ED. Redesigning the care of rheumatic diseases at the practice and system levels. Part 1. Practice level process improvement (redesign 101). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 5563.
  • 22
    Berwick DM, Nolan TW. Physicians as leaders in improving health care: a new series in Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 28992.
  • 23
    Berwick DM. Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 6516.
  • 24
    Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001.
  • 25
    Berwick DM. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ 1996; 312: 61922.
  • 26
    Goroll AH, Sirio C, Duffy FD, LeBlond RF, Alguire P, Blackwell TA, et al. A new model for accreditation of residency programs in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 9029.
  • 27
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.