SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

Objective

To evaluate the recent epidemiology of hip fractures in the US.

Methods

We identified hip fracture cases from the 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, which contains more than 28 million emergency department (ED) records.

Results

In 2008, approximately 341,000 (95% confidence interval 323,000–358,000) patients visited EDs with hip fractures. Of those, 90% were age >60 years. Between ages 60–85 years, the risk of fracture doubled for every 5- to 6-year increase in age. However, the hip fracture risk increased slowly after age 85 years. The overall trochanteric-to-cervical fracture ratio was nearly 2:1. The risk of trochanteric fracture increased faster with age compared with the risk of cervical fracture. At age 85 years, the rates of trochanteric and cervical fractures (per 100,000) were 1,300 and 700, respectively, among women and 800 and 500, respectively, among men.

Conclusion

The slowed growth of hip fracture risk after age 85 years suggests that the eldest old group may have a distinct hip fracture risk. Our study showed that trochanteric fractures were twice as common as cervical fractures. Because trochanteric fractures are more closely related to severe and generalized bone loss than cervical fractures, we hypothesize that the high incidence rate of trochanteric fractures in the US suggests that osteoporosis is a health problem that is linked to hip fracture. In addition to improved safety measures to reduce falls, rigorous preventive treatments of osteoporosis may be needed.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

Hip fractures, frequently encountered in older adults, are associated with osteoporosis. More than 90% of hip fractures among older adults are caused by falls (1). Due to their frequency, hip fractures are one of the most challenging public health concerns, often leading to considerable consequences, including disability (2) and premature death (3, 4). Ongoing pain and limited physical mobility can severely compromise quality of life (5). Approximately 20% of US Medicare patients die within 6 months of sustaining a hip fracture (6). In addition to morbidity and mortality, hip fractures impose an enormous economic burden on the health care system (7, 8).

Hip fractures can be classified into 2 major anatomic types: trochanteric and cervical. It has been suggested that these 2 fracture types may have different risk factors (9). Low bone mineral density increases a person's likelihood of sustaining a hip fracture in a fall and is a well-established risk factor (10–14). In particular, trochanteric femur fractures are more closely associated with severe and generalized bone loss than fractures in the cervical region (15–19). Structurally, the trochanteric region has more trabecular components than the cervical region (20) and trabecular bone tends to be more sensitive to changes in estrogen level and subject to more rapid demineralization than cortical bone. As a result, later menopausal age is protective for trochanteric fractures but not for cervical fractures (21). Indeed, bone structure analysis revealed significantly lower trabecular bone volume in patients with trochanteric fracture than in patients with cervical fractures (15, 22). Patients with trochanteric fractures had significantly lower serum vitamin D levels compared with those with cervical hip fractures or the control group (23). This fact suggests that a lower serum vitamin D level may be a risk factor for trochanteric fracture but not for cervical fracture. In addition to the differences in physiopathologic processes leading to trochanteric and cervical fractures, individuals with a trochanteric fracture are hospitalized longer (17) and have higher postfracture mortality (24) compared to those with a cervical fracture.

Despite evidence that these 2 types of hip fractures have distinct underlying pathologies and consequences, the occurrences of trochanteric and cervical fractures in the US are not well understood. Understanding the incidences of these 2 types of hip fractures would benefit development of hip fracture prevention strategies. The emergency department (ED) is largely a point of entry to medical care for patients with hip fractures. Therefore, ED visits may best reflect the incidence of hip fractures in the population. To date, there are no published studies analyzing ED visits for hip fractures in the US.

The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence rate of hip fractures (trochanteric and cervical) based on representative ED records in the US. Additionally, although it is well known that the incidence of fracture exponentially increases with age (25), neither the age interval of the exponential growth nor the age-related increase in hip fracture rates is well documented. We modeled age- and sex-specific hip fracture rates. Using this updated information, we estimated the future burden of hip fractures with respect to the aging population.

Significance & Innovations

  • This is the first study of hip fractures based on representative emergency department samples in the US.

  • This study estimated the incidence rates of trochanteric and cervical fracture.

  • Overall, the trochanteric-to-cervical fracture ratio was 2:1 in the US. Because the trochanteric region of the femur is more vulnerable to severe and generalized bone loss than the cervical region, our study suggests that osteoporosis is a health problem linked to hip fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

We studied the annual frequency of hip fractures in the US using the 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. Our institutional review board (IRB) determined that this study did not involve human subject research and that no IRB review was needed.

Data sources.

The NEDS is a database of nationally representative hospital-based ED records collected annually under the auspices of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The objective of NEDS is to document national estimates of ED visits in the US. Details concerning sampling procedures have been published elsewhere (26). Briefly, this annual survey selects approximately 20% of a stratified sample of hospital-based EDs to produce a nationally representative sample. Stratification for the NEDS includes geographic region of the US, hospital ownership (for profit or not for profit), teaching hospital, urban-rural location, metropolitan area designation, and trauma center designation. In 2008, probability samples of 980 EDs were selected and all visits within the selected EDs were included in the database. As a result, probability samples of 28 million ED visits were selected from a total of 125 million ED visits in 2008.

Diagnostic codes for hip fractures.

We identified hip fracture cases on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 820 (fractures, femur). The individual anatomic regions of the hip fractures were further evaluated by the first subcategory of ICD-9-CM codes: 820.0 and 820.1 for cervical fractures, and 820.2 and 820.3 for trochanteric fractures. When the subcategory was not specified, we redistributed the missing values using the trochanteric-to-cervical ratio within each age.

Annual and lifetime cumulative risk of hip fractures.

The annual incidence rate indicates the risk for an individual in a specified population to sustain a hip fracture within a 1-year period. When the incidence (or occurrence) is divided by the number of people at risk, the incidence becomes the incidence rate (27) as follows:

  • equation image

In this study, the number of new events was the number of hip fracture cases that occurred during 2008. The population at risk is frequently estimated using the mid-interval population during the specified time period (27) and we used the population estimate as of July 1, 2008 (28). The base rate we used was 105, which is a frequently used base rate in published studies.

To estimate the cumulative risk of hip fractures over a lifetime, an annual age- and sex-specific risk of hip fracture was calculated first. To determine the age- and sex-specific annual incidence rates of hip fractures, we calculated the number of ED visits in 2008 for every 100,000 people in each respective demographic group on the basis of the US Census (28). The probabilistic risk of hip fractures over a lifetime is then calculated by adding an annual age- and sex-specific risk of hip fracture. To calculate the risk of hip fracture over the entire lifespan, we assumed that the age- and sex-specific fracture rates would remain the same.

Statistical analysis.

We considered the sampling weight and sampling design in estimating the total number of cases and their SEs. Sampling weights provided by AHRQ were used to account for the unequal sampling probabilities and to produce estimates for all hospital admissions in the US. The SE was estimated using Taylor's linearization. As suggested by the National Center for Health Statistics, a relative SE in excess of 30% is considered to be unreliable.

To reflect the nonlinear growth of hip fracture risk with respect to increasing age, we fitted an exponential equation to the data from which the percentage increase of fracture risk was calculated. The exponential function fitted was y = α exp(βx), where y is the rate of hip fracture, x is the numerical age, and the “exp” (approximately 2.718) is the base of natural logarithms. The constant a is the vertical stretch factor, whereas the constant β is the horizontal stretch factor. The fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient of determination and the residual plot.

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

Number of hip fractures.

In 2008, nearly 341,000 ED visits (95% confidence interval 323,000–358,000) in the US were for hip fractures. Of those, approximately 0.26% (or estimated 910 cases) were open hip fractures. Due to the small sample size, we could not further evaluate or comment on open hip fractures. Hip fractures were the second most common fracture in the lower extremity (Figure 1), constituting 22% of lower extremity fractures. Unlike other lower extremity fractures, as shown in Figure 1, hip fractures were considerably more common in women (68%) than in men (32%).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Number of lower extremity fractures by sex in the US, 2008. ED = emergency department; * = proximal femur fractures (trochanteric and cervical femur fractures).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Nearly 94% of hip fracture cases (n = 321,000) occurred among those age ≥50 years. Because hip fractures were rare events for young adults, we limited further evaluation to patients age ≥50 years in order to report reliable age- and sex-specific estimates. To investigate the patient burden in EDs due to hip fractures, we first estimated the frequency of ED visits for each age without an adjustment to the population size. The vast majority of hip fracture patients in EDs were women in their 80s; more than 140,000 patients were in their 80s and 73% of those were women. As shown in Figure 2, the number of ED visits for hip fractures rose steadily in adults as age increased, with the peak occurring at age 86 years. Among hip fracture cases, nearly 44% of women and 34% of men were age ≥85 years.

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Number of hip fractures by age in the US, 2008.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Incidence rate of hip fractures.

To estimate the risk of fracture, we calculated age- and sex-specific fracture rates taking into account their respective US population sizes (28). The risk of hip fracture increased exponentially for women between ages 60–85 years (R2 = >0.99) and for men between ages 60–90 years (R2 = >0.99). The fitted lines shown in Figure 3 are as follows: hip fracture rate = 0.0288 × exp(0.1317 age) for women and hip fracture rate = 0.0362 × exp(0.1225 age) for men.

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Exponential growth of hip fracture rates in the US for women ages 60–85 years and for men ages 60–90 years, 2008. Hip fracture rates increase with age in both men and women. Compared with women age 60 years, the risk for hip fractures was 4 times (= e0.1317 × 10) higher for women age 70 years and 14 times (= e0.1317 × 20) higher for women age 80 years.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Among women, the hip fracture rate (per 100,000) at age 60 years was 78 (= 0.0288×exp[0.1317×60]) and the rate of fracture increased by 14% (= exp[0.1317]) for every 1-year increase in age. That is, compared with women age 60 years, the risk of sustaining a hip fracture was nearly 4 times greater for women age 70 years, 14 times greater for women age 80 years, and 27 times greater for women age 85 years.

Among men, the rate of hip fracture (per 100,000) at age 60 years was 56 and the rate of fracture increased by 13% for every 1-year increase in age. For both women and men, the risk of fracture nearly doubled for every 5- to 6-year increase in age between ages 60–85 years. At age 85 years, the rates of hip fracture for women and men were nearly 2,000 and 1,300 (per 100,000), respectively (Figure 3).

The exponential model was not adequate for describing trends for women age >85 years and for men age >90 years, due to a slower rate of increase. However, the risk of fracture increased steadily, with the highest peak occurring among those between ages 93–96 years. Nearly 3,100 and 2,400 (per 100,000) women and men had hip fractures, respectively, in this age group (Figure 3).

Cumulative risk of hip fracture during lifetime.

Until age 64 years, the cumulative risk of hip fracture was less than 1%, although the risk grew rapidly with age (Figure 4). Given an average lifespan of 80 years, unless fracture prevention programs improve, approximately 10% of women and 6% of men in the US will experience a hip fracture during their lifetime. Approximately 19% of women and 12% of men who reached age 85 years sustained hip fractures, and nearly 30% of women and 20% of men who reached age 90 years sustained hip fractures.

thumbnail image

Figure 4. Lifetime risk of hip fracture in the US, 2008. Nearly 30% and 20% of women and men, respectively, who reached age 90 years sustained hip fractures.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Trochanteric versus cervical fractures of the femur.

The overall ratio of trochanteric-to-cervical fractures was approximately 2:1. The rate of trochanteric fractures was substantially larger than that of cervical fractures for women and men of all ages (Figure 5). Age was a particularly strong risk factor for trochanteric fractures compared with cervical fractures. At age 90 years, the rates of trochanteric and cervical fractures (per 100,000) were 1,950 and 850, respectively, among women, and 1,450 and 650, respectively, among men.

thumbnail image

Figure 5. Annual incidence rates of hip fractures by anatomic region and sex in the US, 2008.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Projected hip fractures.

To approximate the incidence of ED visits for hip fractures, we applied the 2008 age- and sex-specific fracture rates to the US population size projected for 2020, 2030, and 2040 (29). Hip fracture rates declined from 1997–2003 in the US (30, 31). However, no decreasing pattern is apparent among women since 2004 (31); it is not clear if the fracture rates have now stabilized. In an effort to calculate a conservative projection, we assumed a 20% decrease in the hip fracture rate compared to 2008 before the rate apparently stabilized. As shown in Figure 6, if the hip fracture risk is 20% lower than that in 2008, approximately 437,000 ED visits due to hip fractures can be expected in 2030. In 2040, when baby boomers are between ages 76–94 years, approximately 582,000 ED visits due to hip fractures are expected.

thumbnail image

Figure 6. Projected number of hip fractures among people age ≥50 years in the US in 2020, 2030, and 2040.

Download figure to PowerPoint

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

Our study documents the sex- and age-specific incidence rate of hip fracture in the US. Although a decline in the age-adjusted incidence rate of hip fractures was reported between 1997 and 2003 among inpatients (30, 31) and US Medicare patients (32), the rate of hip fracture in the US is still higher than in non-Scandinavian countries (33–35); this finding is consistent with a previous review study (36).

Overall, the trochanteric-to-cervical fracture ratio was 2:1 in the US. In Spain, trochanteric fractures are slightly more common than cervical fractures (54% versus 46%) (34). However, cervical fractures are more common in China (37), women in Taiwan (38), Sweden (39), Norway (40), and Finland (41). It is well understood that the trochanteric region of the femur is more vulnerable to severe and generalized bone loss than the cervical region (10, 15–19), and we hypothesize that the increase in the number of trochanteric fractures in the US suggests that osteoporosis, as a significant health problem, is linked to hip fracture. However, we also acknowledge that this phenomenon could be explained by multiple factors, including ethnicity, diet, completeness of diagnostic coding in the database, and femur geometry. The association between the proximal femur geometry and fracture type was previously reported (42, 43), yet results were conflicting.

Our study found that trochanteric fractures were more common than cervical fractures for all ages and both sexes. Two decades ago, a study based on the Medicare population reported that the ratio of trochanteric-to-cervical fractures increased with age among white women (44); our study confirms this finding. In addition, the authors reported that cervical fractures were more common among white women age <80 years (44); however, our study found that trochanteric fractures were more common in women and men of all ages. Further investigation is needed to determine whether our findings reflect a change in the occurrence of hip fractures by anatomic location compared to 2 decades ago.

The eldest old group is an understudied group, and our study suggests that this age group had a distinct hip fracture risk. In general, the risk of sustaining a hip fracture grows exponentially with age among the elderly up to age 85 years. However, the exponential function did not accurately describe trends among people age >86 years. Previously, Couris et al reported the same finding on the basis of inpatient data in France; they concluded that an exponential model was not adequate to describe the increase in the incidence rate among women age ≥85 years (45). As Couris and colleagues noted, we believe that women ages 85–95 years who are still at risk for hip fracture may represent a population with better overall health and a lower risk of hip fracture. However, the reasons for the decrease in hip fracture rates among those age >95 years are not clear. It is possible that many people in this age group are unable to get out of bed without assistance, use a wheelchair, and are generally inactive and therefore have less opportunity to fall. Given that 40% of hip fractures occur in individuals age ≥85 years, an accurate description of the risk for this age group will add to our understanding of the future burden of hip fractures in the US.

A number of prevention strategies have been proposed to slow bone loss (46–49). The age-adjusted rate of hospitalization for hip fractures has decreased between 1997 and 2003 in the US (30, 31), and researchers have speculated that the decline in fracture incidence rates could be, in part, a result of the introduction of several bisphosphonates (30, 32). Despite the reported decreases in hip fracture incidence rates in the US, our study showed that hip fractures remain a growing burden in the US primarily due to the rapidly expanding elderly population. Hip fractures occurred mainly among those age ≥75 years. Compared with 2008, by 2040 it is expected that there will be 26 million more people age ≥75 years (from 18.6 million to 44.6 million) (29). This expanding elderly population will inevitably increase the number of hip fractures and associated ED visits.

The strength of this study lies in the large sample size of the NEDS data, which constitute over 28 million visits selected with known probability. This sample was large enough to yield estimations for specific ages (not age groups) for women and men. There are, however, several limitations of this study. First, while it has been reported that whites have a 2- to 3-fold higher risk for hip fractures (50), the 2008 NEDS database does not include patients' race or ethnicity. Therefore, we were not able to stratify our results according to race or ethnic group. Second, although it is possible that an individual patient may present with multiple hip fractures during the same year, we could not estimate how many patients were returning to the ED with a second hip fracture in 2008. Third, although the ED visits may best reflect the incidence of hip fractures, we also recognize that not all cases of hip fractures are seen in an ED. For instance, if a patient who sustained a hip fracture died from concurrent trauma at the scene, that patient may not be brought to the ED. If a patient with a hip fracture was directly admitted to a hospital, this patient would not be captured in the ED database. However, we cannot confirm the extent or frequency of such occurrences. Finally, the accuracy of the ICD-9-CM codes submitted by each ED is unknown. Although large databases are prone to some degree of error based on the accuracy of data entry and diagnostic coding, we believe these databases are still valuable for insight into ED utilization for hip fractures.

In conclusion, the risk of hip fracture grew exponentially among women and men ages 60–85 years; the risk of fracture almost doubled for every 5- to 6-year increase in age. Surprisingly, the risk of trochanteric fracture, a strong indication of osteoporosis, increased significantly faster with age compared with the risk of cervical fracture. Rigorous safety measures to prevent injurious falls, and treatments aimed at preventing osteoporosis, would benefit men and women in this age group. Despite prior reports showing decreased hip fracture incidence rates in the US, as baby boomers age, an expanding elderly population will inevitably result in an increase in the number of hip fractures, the number of ED visits, and the demands for inpatient care.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be submitted for publication. Dr. Kim had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study conception and design. Kim, Meehan, Blumenfeld, Szabo.

Acquisition of data. Kim.

Analysis and interpretation of data. Kim, Meehan, Blumenfeld, Szabo.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES

The authors thank Dr. Betty Guo at University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Office of Research, for commenting on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. REFERENCES
  • 1
    Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, Chiu GY, Maislin G, O'Brien LA, et al. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 132631.
  • 2
    Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ. Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 164450.
  • 3
    Piirtola M, Vahlberg T, Lopponen M, Raiha I, Isoaho R, Kivela SL. Fractures as predictors of excess mortality in the aged: a population-based study with a 12-year follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol 2008; 23: 74755.
  • 4
    Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Bean K, Ostertag-Ezembe A, Hervy F. Clinical outcomes and mortality after hip fracture: a 2-year follow-up study. Bone 1996; 18 Suppl: 149S57S.
  • 5
    Hall SE, Williams JA, Senior JA, Goldswain PR, Criddle RA. Hip fracture outcomes: quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community. Aust N Z J Med 2000; 30: 32732.
  • 6
    Tosteson AN, Gottlieb DJ, Radley DC, Fisher ES, Melton LJ III. Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 146372.
  • 7
    Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States: numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990: 1636.
  • 8
    Barfield E. Osteoporosis-related hip fractures cost $13 billion to $18 billion yearly. Food Rev 1996; 1: 316.
  • 9
    Jokinen H, Pulkkinen P, Korpelainen J, Heikkinen J, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Jamsa T, et al. Risk factors for cervical and trochanteric hip fractures in elderly women: a population-based 10-year follow-up study. Calcif Tissue Int 2010; 87: 4451.
  • 10
    Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Kido TH, Krasnow MB, Hayes WC. Trochanteric bone mineral density is associated with type of hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 188994.
  • 11
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, de Laet C, Delmas P, et al. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 118594.
  • 12
    Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 76773.
  • 13
    Cummings SR, Cawthon PM, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Fink HA, Orwoll ES. BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older women. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 15506.
  • 14
    Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1997; 19: 24457.
  • 15
    Mautalen CA, Vega EM, Einhorn TA. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? Bone 1996; 18 Suppl: 133S7S.
  • 16
    Schott AM, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Dargent-Molina P, Hajri T, Breart G, et al. Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women: results from the EPIDOS study. Bone 2005; 37: 85863.
  • 17
    Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Tappero R, Cavanna A. Hip-fracture type does not affect the functional outcome after acute in-patient rehabilitation: a study of 684 elderly women. Eura Medicophys 2007; 43: 43944.
  • 18
    Vega E, Mautalen C, Gomez H, Garrido A, Melo L, Sahores AO. Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 1991; 1: 816.
  • 19
    Nakamura N, Kyou T, Takaoka K, Ohzono K, Ono K. Bone mineral density in the proxial femur and hip fracture type in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7: 7559.
  • 20
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Invest 1982; 70: 71623.
  • 21
    Michaelsson K, Weiderpass E, Farahmand BY, Baron JA, Persson PG, Ziden L, et al. Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10: 48794.
  • 22
    Uitewaal PJ, Lips P, Netelenbos JC. An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture. Bone Miner 1987; 3: 6373.
  • 23
    Dretakis OE, Margioris AN, Tsatsanis C, Dretakis KE, Malliaraki N, Steriopoulos K. Elderly patients with trochanteric hip fracture have lower serum vitamin D levels compared to patients with cervical hip fracture. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011; 52: e158.
  • 24
    Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 1993; 307: 124850.
  • 25
    Scott JC. Osteoporosis and hip fractures. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1990; 16: 71740.
  • 26
    Agency for Health Research and Quality. Overview of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. 2010. URL: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nedsoverview.jsp.
  • 27
    Oleckno WA. Essential epidemiology: principles and applications. Prospect Heights (IL): Waveland; 2002.
  • 28
    US Census Bureau. Population estimates: national sex and age. URL: http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2009-sa.html.
  • 29
    US Census Bureau. US interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 2000-2050. URL: http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/usinterimproj/.
  • 30
    Gehlbach SH, Avrunin JS, Puleo E. Trends in hospital care for hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 58591.
  • 31
    Stevens JA, Rudd RA. Declining hip fracture rates in the United States. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 5003.
  • 32
    Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 2009; 302: 15739.
  • 33
    Hagino H, Yamamoto K, Ohshiro H, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Nose T. Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan. Bone 1999; 24: 26570.
  • 34
    Hernandez JL, Olmos JM, Alonso MA, Gonzalez-Fernandez CR, Martinez J, Pajaron M, et al. Trend in hip fracture epidemiology over a 14-year period in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 46470.
  • 35
    Gronskag AB, Forsmo S, Romundstad P, Langhammer A, Schei B. Incidence and seasonal variation in hip fracture incidence among elderly women in Norway: the HUNT Study. Bone 2010; 46: 12948.
  • 36
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, de Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK. International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 123744.
  • 37
    Yan L, Zhou B, Prentice A, Wang X, Golden MH. Epidemiological study of hip fracture in Shenyang, People's Republic of China. Bone 1999; 24: 1515.
  • 38
    Shao CJ, Hsieh YH, Tsai CH, Lai KA. A nationwide seven-year trend of hip fractures in the elderly population of Taiwan. Bone 2009; 44: 1259.
  • 39
    Lofman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, Toss G. Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 1825.
  • 40
    Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Incidence of hip fracture in southeastern Norway: a study of 1,730 cervical and trochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2007; 31: 6659.
  • 41
    Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 1996; 18 Suppl: 57S63S.
  • 42
    Panula J, Savela M, Jaatinen PT, Aarnio P, Kivela SL. The impact of proximal femur geometry on fracture type: a comparison between cervical and trochanteric fractures with two parameters. Scand J Surg 2008; 97: 26671.
  • 43
    Pulkkinen P, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Kuhn V, Jamsa T. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 895901.
  • 44
    Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA. Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 67782.
  • 45
    Couris CM, Duclos A, Rabilloud M, Couray-Targe S, Ecochard R, Delmas PD, et al. A seventy percent overestimation of the burden of hip fractures in women aged 85 and over. Bone 2007; 41: 896900.
  • 46
    Chapuy MC, Pamphile R, Paris E, Kempf C, Schlichting M, Arnaud S, et al. Combined calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation in elderly women: confirmation of reversal of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hip fracture risk. The Decalyos II study. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 25764.
  • 47
    Lilliu H, Pamphile R, Chapuy MC, Schulten J, Arlot M, Meunier PJ. Calcium-vitamin D3 supplementation is cost-effective in hip fractures prevention. Maturitas 2003; 44: 299305.
  • 48
    Meunier PJ, Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Delmas PD, Duboeuf F. Can we stop bone loss and prevent hip fractures in the elderly? Osteoporos Int 1994; 4 Suppl: 716.
  • 49
    Lips P. Prevention of hip fractures: drug therapy. Bone 1996; 18 Suppl: 159S63S.
  • 50
    Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 6128.