SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Machold KP. Prevention and cure of rheumatoid arthritis: is it possible? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24: 35361.
  • 2
    Grondal L, Tengstrand B, Nordmark B, Wretenberg P, Stark A. The foot: still the most important reason for walking incapacity in rheumatoid arthritis. Distribution of symptomatic joints in 1,000 RA patients. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 25761.
  • 3
    Van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Ursum J, Rutger D, Roorda LD, van Schaardenburg D, et al. Prevalence and course of forefoot impairments and walking disability in the first eight years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 1596602.
  • 4
    Otter SJ, Lucas K, Springett K, Moore A, Davies K, Cheek L, et al. Foot pain in rheumatoid arthritis prevalence, risk factors and management: an epidemiological study. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 25571.
  • 5
    Helliwell P, Reay N, Gilworth G, Redmond A, Slade A, Tennant A, et al. Development of a foot impact scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 41822.
  • 6
    Van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Terwee CB, Rosenbaum D, Turner D, Woodburn J, et al. A systematic review of instruments measuring foot function, foot pain, and foot-related disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 125769.
  • 7
    Rome K, Gow PJ, Dalbeth N, Chapman JM. Clinical audit of foot problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated at Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2: 16.
  • 8
    Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Woodburn J. Methodological considerations for a randomised controlled trial of podiatry care in rheumatoid arthritis: lessons from an exploratory trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 6: 109.
  • 9
    Turner DE, Woodburn J. Characterising the clinical and biomechanical features of severely deformed feet in rheumatoid arthritis. Gait Posture 2008; 28: 57480.
  • 10
    Woodburn J, Vliet Vlieland TP, van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP. Rasch analysis of Dutch-translated version of the Foot Impact Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50: 13159.
  • 11
    Gilworth G, Emery P, Gossec L, Vliet Vlieland TP, Breedveld FC, Hueber AJ, et al. Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS). Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 168690.
  • 12
    Ndosi M, Tennant A, Bergsten U, Kukkurainen ML, Machado P, de la Torre-Aboki J, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in RA in 7 European countries. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 110.
  • 13
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 318691.
  • 14
    Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 135862.
  • 15
    Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 7: 32831.
  • 16
    Elhan AH, Kutlay S, Kucukdeveci AA, Cotuk C, Ozturk G, Tesio L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 30611.
  • 17
    Hambleton RK. Good practices for identifying differential item functioning. Med Care 2006; 44 Suppl 3: S1828.
  • 18
    Crane PK, Hart DL, Gibbons LE, Cook KF. A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 47884.
  • 19
    Chien CW, Brown T, McDonald R. Cross-cultural validity of a naturalistic observational assessment of children's hand skills: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 6317.