INTRODUCTION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- PATIENTS AND METHODS
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Acknowledgements
- REFERENCES
- Supporting Information
Gouty arthritis is a common type of chronic arthritis in which high serum uric acid (sUA) levels and crystal deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) are considered to play crucial roles (1). The associations between hyperuricemia and comorbidities, such as hypertension, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, have been shown in many epidemiologic studies (2, 3). The growing prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome may be related to the increasing prevalence of gouty arthritis in recent decades (4).
The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported a remarkably high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in individuals with hyperuricemia or gout (3, 5). Although the most important risk factor for gout development is hyperuricemia (1), only one-tenth of hyperuricemic patients develop gout. Meanwhile, not all patients with gouty arthritis are found to have hyperuricemia. These findings may reveal the potential possibility that factors other than hyperuricemia initiate or precipitate gout (1).
We recently reported the predictability of obesity and dyslipidemia for incident gout, which is more prominent in women than men (6). While a strong association between hyperuricemia and insulin resistance was shown (7, 8), the combined effect between hyperuricemia and elements of metabolic syndrome on the development of gout was still uncertain. A synergistic effect between MSU crystals and free fatty acids to stimulate Toll-like receptors during gouty arthritis initiation has been suggested (9). Therefore, we hypothesized that the interactions between sUA and metabolic comorbidities may increase the risk of gout development. We used the MJ Health Screening Center database and followup information from the Bureau of National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan to assess the impact of metabolic comorbidities on gout development with or without the presence of hyperuricemia.
Significance & Innovations
-
A synergistic effect between hyperuricemia and overweight, general obesity, or central obesity was demonstrated for gout development.
-
The impact of metabolic syndrome on gout development was significant in men. Metabolic syndrome noted at baseline can predict future gout, even if the urate is unsaturated for precipitation (serum uric acid [sUA] <7 mg/dl).
-
Obesity in women (including overweight and general obesity) and hypertriglyceridemia in men may also precipitate gouty arthritis at an sUA level below the saturation point.
RESULTS
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- PATIENTS AND METHODS
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Acknowledgements
- REFERENCES
- Supporting Information
With a mean ± SD followup time of 6.45 ± 0.65 years (261,500 person-years in total), 1,189 patients (2.9%, 899 men and 290 women) developed gout (Table 1). The mean ± SD age of the subjects with gout was 49.5 ± 15.1 years (47.6 ± 15.1 years for men and 55.4 ± 13.3 years for women). Most of the gout patients were men (75.6%). Compared to men in the self-reported prevalent gout group (n = 1,725 [1,053 men and 672 women]; see Supplementary Table 1, available in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658), men with new-onset incident gout were younger (mean ± SD age 52.0 ± 14.2 years). In the incident gout patient group, the ratio of men to women for gouty arthritis was ∼3.1 (899 to 290), which was larger than the ratio of <2 (1,053 to 672) in the prevalent gout patient group. The sex ratio discrepancy between the incident and prevalent gout patient groups can be explained by the fact that a more equal sex distribution has been noted among elderly gout patients (15), which was seen in the prevalent gout patient group.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics between men and women in the MJ cohort (n = 40,513)*| | Men | Women ages >50 years | Women ages ≤50 years |
|---|
| Control (n = 17,058) | Gout (n = 899) | P | Control (n = 6,384) | Gout (n = 202) | P | Control (n = 15,882) | Gout (n = 88) | P |
|---|
|
| Incidence (per 103 person-years), mean | – | 6.39 | – | – | 1.23 | – | | 0.48 | – |
| Age, years | 41.6 ± 14.7 | 47.6 ± 15.1 | < 0.001 | 60.0 ± 7.0 | 62.6 ± 8.6 | < 0.001 | 33.7 ± 8.0 | 39.6 ± 8.0 | < 0.001 |
| Uric acid, mg/dl | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 8.2 ± 1.6 | < 0.001 | 5.6 ± 1.4 | 7.0 ± 2.1 | < 0.001 | 5.0 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 1.7 | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.5 ± 3.2 | 25.0 ± 3.2 | < 0.001 | 24.7 ± 3.4 | 26.5 ± 3.6 | < 0.001 | 22.0 ± 3.3 | 24.1 ± 4.1 | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 83.9 ± 9.3 | 88.6 ± 8.8 | < 0.001 | 87.1 ± 10.0 | 91.4 ± 9.8 | < 0.001 | 76.8 ± 9.3 | 83.0 ± 10.4 | < 0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 122.5 ± 75.9 | 151.1 ± 78.7 | < 0.001 | 131.4 ± 73.9 | 153.1 ± 70.1 | < 0.001 | 84.8 ± 46.2 | 111.7 ± 67.5 | < 0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 42.7 ± 12.9 | 42.9 ± 14.0 | 0.61 | 50.5 ± 14.4 | 48.9 ± 13.0 | 0.46 | 49.8 ± 13.0 | 50.4 ± 14.3 | 0.64 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 127.8 ± 18.1 | 134.8 ± 20.6 | < 0.001 | 139.1 ± 23.0 | 143.8 ± 26.2 | 0.01 | 115.3 ± 14.6 | 119.6 ± 18.9 | 0.04 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 71.8 ± 11.1 | 76.3 ± 12.1 | < 0.001 | 75.2 ± 12.0 | 75.5 ± 12.5 | 0.78 | 63.9 ± 9.3 | 67.1 ± 11.4 | 0.01 |
| Glucose, mg/dl | 99.6 ± 22.5 | 101.3 ± 21.5 | 0.03 | 107.8 ± 34.2 | 109.6 ± 33.9 | < 0.001 | 93.4 ± 14.2 | 95.3 ± 16.1 | 0.21 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 80.3 ± 14.1 | 73.9 ± 15.6 | < 0.001 | 72.8 ± 14.5 | 66.1 ± 16.5 | < 0.001 | 89.2 ± 15.0 | 81.8 ± 14.1 | < 0.001 |
| Hyperuricemia, no. (%) | 6,011 (35.2) | 701 (78.0) | < 0.001 | 859 (13.4) | 97 (48.0) | < 0.001 | 777 (4.9) | 22 (25.0) | < 0.001 |
| Overweight, no. (%) | 7,174 (42.1) | 552 (61.4) | < 0.001 | 3,595 (56.3) | 154 (76.2) | < 0.001 | 3,597 (22.6) | 37 (42.1) | < 0.001 |
| General obesity, no. (%) | 2,221 (13.0) | 211 (23.5) | < 0.001 | 1,450 (22.7) | 86 (42.6) | < 0.001 | 1,250 (7.8) | 20 (22.7) | 0.001 |
| Central obesity, no. (%) | 4,554 (26.7) | 408 (45.4) | < 0.001 | 3,744 (58.6) | 147 (72.8) | < 0.001 | 3,109 (19.6) | 34 (38.6) | < 0.001 |
| High triglyceride level, no. (%) | 4,225 (24.8) | 370 (41.2) | < 0.001 | 1,848 (29.0) | 90 (44.6) | < 0.001 | 1,246 (7.8) | 17 (19.3) | 0.008 |
| Low HDL cholesterol, no. (%) | 7,836 (45.9) | 433 (48.2) | 0.19 | 3,332 (52.2) | 116 (57.4) | 0.14 | 8,380 (52.8) | 45 (51.1) | 0.76 |
| High blood pressure, no. (%) | 6,713 (39.4) | 484 (53.8) | < 0.001 | 3,891 (61.0) | 138 (68.3) | 0.03 | 2,075 (13.1) | 24 (27.3) | 0.004 |
| Hyperglycemia, no. (%) | 4,906 (28.8) | 324 (36.0) | < 0.001 | 2,788 (43.7) | 91 (45.1) | 0.70 | 2,200 (13.9) | 12 (13.6) | < 0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome, no. (%) | 4,250 (24.9) | 382 (42.5) | < 0.001 | 3,131 (49.0) | 126 (62.4) | < 0.001 | 1,522 (9.6) | 21 (23.9) | 0.002 |
| Renal insufficiency, no. (%) | 1,073 (6.3) | 171 (19.0) | < 0.001 | 1,096 (17.2) | 77 (38.1) | < 0.001 | 158 (1.0) | 4 (4.5) | 0.12 |
| Cigarette smoking, no. (%) | 9,558 (56.0) | 469 (52.2) | 0.02 | 978 (15.3) | 29 (14.4) | 0.71 | 2,866 (18.1) | 15 (17.1) | 0.81 |
| Alcohol drinking, no. (%) | 9,658 (56.6) | 511 (56.8) | 0.90 | 1,280 (20.1) | 36 (17.8) | 0.44 | 3,817 (24.0) | 27 (30.7) | 0.15 |
The standardized gout incidence was 3.72 per 1,000 person-years (Table 1). The mean sUA level and prevalence of hyperuricemia among gout patients were much higher than the controls. The prevalence of hyperuricemia in women with gout, as shown in Table 1, was lower than in men; however, the prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, such as renal insufficiency (38.1%), general obesity (42.6%), central obesity (72.8%), low HDL cholesterol (57.4%), and metabolic syndrome (62.4%), was significantly higher in women ages >50 years with gout than in men (19.0%, 23.5%, 45.4%, 48.2%, and 42.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Therefore, the impact of hyperuricemia and respective metabolic comorbidities on gout attacks may be different between sexes, especially between men and women ages >50 years.
As expected, hyperuricemia was the most important risk factor for gout development. The multivariate adjusted HR of hyperuricemia was 5.80 (95% CI 4.93–6.81) in men, which was followed by renal insufficiency (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.37–2.01), hypertriglyceridemia (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21–1.60), general obesity (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11–1.53), and high blood pressure (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.37). No statistical significance was noted for hyperglycemia and low HDL cholesterol (Table 2). Meanwhile, overweight, central obesity, and metabolic syndrome in men had estimated HRs of 1.31 (95% CI 1.14–1.51), 1.30 (95% CI 1.13–1.50), and 1.37 (95% CI 1.20–1.58), respectively.
Table 2. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors for incident gout*| | Men (n = 899 of 17,957) | Women ages >50 years (n = 202 of 6,586) | Women ages ≤50 years (n = 88 of 15,970) |
|---|
| Age adjusted | Multiadjusted | Age adjusted | Multiadjusted | Age adjusted | Multiadjusted |
|---|
|
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.03 (1.02–1.03)† | 1.02 (1.02–1.03)† | 1.05 (1.03–1.07)† | 1.03 (1.01–1.05)† | 1.10 (1.07–1.13)† | 1.08 (1.05–1.11)† |
| Hyperuricemia | 6.68 (5.70–7.81)† | 5.80 (4.93–6.81)† | 5.56 (4.21–7.34)† | 4.27 (3.18–5.73)† | 5.53 (3.41–8.99)† | 4.66 (2.75–7.89)† |
| General obesity | 1.95 (1.67–2.27)† | 1.30 (1.11–1.53)† | 2.49 (1.89–3.29)† | 1.97 (1.48–2.62)† | 2.22 (1.33–3.72)† | 1.63 (0.93–2.86) |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 1.99 (1.74–2.27)† | 1.39 (1.21–1.60)† | 1.82 (1.38–2.41)† | 1.37 (1.02–1.83)† | 1.87 (1.09–3.22)† | 1.36 (0.75–2.33) |
| Low HDL cholesterol | 1.14 (1.00–1.30)† | 0.94 (0.82–1.07) | 1.20 (0.91–1.59) | 0.99 (0.74–1.32) | 0.95 (0.63–1.45) | 0.84 (0.55–1.30) |
| High blood pressure | 1.46 (1.27–1.68)† | 1.19 (1.03–1.37)† | 1.17 (0.86–1.58) | 1.00 (0.73–1.36) | 1.51 (0.92–2.47) | 1.26 (0.75–2.11) |
| Hyperglycemia | 1.13 (0.99–1.30) | 0.97 (0.84–1.12) | 0.98 (0.74–1.30) | 0.78 (0.59–1.04) | 0.64 (0.34–1.18) | 0.48 (0.25–0.91) |
| Renal insufficiency | 2.42 (2.01–2.92)† | 1.66 (1.37–2.01)† | 2.56 (1.88–3.48)† | 1.79 (1.31–2.46)† | 2.70 (0.98–7.44) | 1.80 (0.65–5.03) |
| Cigarette smoking | 0.81 (0.71–0.93) | 0.78 (0.68–0.90) | 0.86 (0.58–1.27) | 1.02 (0.61–1.72) | 1.02 (0.59–1.78) | 0.82 (0.42–1.58) |
| Alcohol drinking | 1.01 (0.88–1.15) | 1.05 (0.91–1.20) | 0.87 (0.60–1.24) | 0.89 (0.55–1.43) | 1.32 (0.84–2.07) | 1.42 (0.83–2.44) |
| Overweight‡ | 1.99 (1.74–2.27)† | 1.31 (1.14–1.51)† | 2.47 (1.79–3.41)† | 1.83 (1.31–2.55)† | 1.59 (1.02–2.48)† | 1.18 (0.73–1.91) |
| Central obesity‡ | 1.89 (1.65–2.17)† | 1.30 (1.13–1.50)† | 1.70 (1.24–2.32)† | 1.39 (1.01–1.92)† | 1.75 (1.12–2.74)† | 1.45 (0.91–2.30) |
| Metabolic syndrome§ | 1.85 (1.61–2.12)† | 1.37 (1.20–1.58)† | 1.52 (1.14–2.03)† | 1.15 (0.85–1.54) | 1.75 (1.04–2.92)† | 1.29 (0.76–2.19) |
The combined effects of hyperuricemia with either general obesity, central obesity, or overweight in men are shown in Figure 1. The mean ± SD incidence was 2.66 ± 0.71 × 10−3 person-years for men without hyperuricemia and general obesity, 3.54 ± 0.82 × 10−3 person-years for men with general obesity but not hyperuricemia, 15.54 ± 1.11 × 10−3 person-years for men with hyperuricemia but not general obesity, and 22.50 ± 6.08 × 10−3 person-years for men with general obesity and hyperuricemia. Similar but smaller estimates of incidence were noted for women, with 1.02 ± 0.51 × 10−3 person-years for women without hyperuricemia and general obesity, 3.38 ± 0.77 × 10−3 person-years for women with general obesity but not hyperuricemia, 8.43 ± 1.01 × 10−3 person-years for women with hyperuricemia but not general obesity, and 16.05 ± 1.34 × 10−3 person-years for women with general obesity and hyperuricemia (Figure 2). Comparable trends of increasing incidence for hyperuricemia interactive either with central obesity or overweight were also demonstrated.
Relative risks were further used to demonstrate the combined effects of hyperuricemia either with general obesity, central obesity, or overweight. Using a subgroup of men without hyperuricemia and general obesity as a reference, HRs were estimated at 1.12 (95% CI 0.73–1.72) for men with general obesity but not hyperuricemia, 5.64 (95% CI 4.74–6.72) for men with hyperuricemia but not general obesity, and 7.45 (95% CI 6.00–9.25) for men with general obesity and hyperuricemia (Figure 1). Similarly noted in women, HRs were 2.06 (95% CI 1.46–2.90), 4.58 (95% CI 3.32–6.34), and 8.11 (95% CI 5.79–11.37), respectively, as compared to those with normal sUA levels and no obesity (Figure 2). Although a comparable risk of gout was shown for hyperuricemia interactive with either central obesity or overweight in both sexes, a prominently synergistic effect was noted in women with general obesity and hyperuricemia.
Because our findings showed that subjects without hyperuricemia and obesity still developed gout, we hypothesized that other comorbidities may contribute to the risk of gout development at sUA levels below the saturation point for MSU crystal deposition. However, in men with an sUA level of 7 mg/dl or below, we failed to demonstrate statistically significant risks for most of the comorbidities assessed. Only hypertriglyceridemia, with an HR of 1.40 (95% CI 1.02–1.92), was identified through a stepwise selection method, whereas hypertriglyceridemia was not significantly associated with gout development in men when the sUA cut point was lowered to 6 mg/dl or below (Figure 3). Conversely, in older women with sUA levels of 7 mg/dl or below, HRs of general obesity, overweight, and central obesity were consistently significant, with HRs of 2.19 (95% CI 1.47–3.26), 2.01 (95% CI 1.33–3.04), and 1.96 (95% CI 1.28–3.01), respectively. When we lowered the sUA cut point further from 7 mg/dl or below to 6 mg/dl, the risks of general obesity and overweight remained significant, with HRs of 2.16 (95% CI 1.31–3.56) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.03–2.73), respectively, although central obesity was not significant. However, neither general obesity, overweight, nor central obesity was a significant risk factor for gout development in older women when the sUA cut point was lowered to 5 mg/dl or below (Figure 3).
Meanwhile, metabolic syndrome was found to be significant in men who had an sUA level of 7 mg/dl or below (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01–1.87), but was not significant in women. A statistically significant risk of alcohol drinking was found only in the older women with hyperuricemia (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.09–3.60). Although the personal habit of alcohol drinking is considered a significant risk for a gout attack, we failed to find significance for other subgroups in the present study.
DISCUSSION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- PATIENTS AND METHODS
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Acknowledgements
- REFERENCES
- Supporting Information
This is a pioneering study that demonstrates the intricate relationship between hyperuricemia and respective metabolic comorbidities, particularly overweight, general obesity, and central obesity, to precipitate gouty arthritis. As expected, an enhanced combined effect was noted for gout development as compared with individual effect. Furthermore, the impact of metabolic syndrome on gout development was significant in men, which is comparable to previous reports (3, 16, 17). In addition, metabolic syndrome noted at baseline can predict a future gout event, even if the urate is unsaturated for precipitation.
Hyperuricemia may be related to obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction through the mediation of insulin resistance. The relationship between hyperuricemia and gouty arthritis is initiated from phagocytosis of MSU crystals by white cells. MSU crystals trigger Toll-like receptors or interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptors on the surface of macrophages to activate NLRP3 inflammasome to release IL-1β and subsequently induce neutrophil and macrophage influx (18). According to previous research, soluble urate can be a danger signal to trigger NLRP3 inflammasome (19) and play an adjuvant role as an alum to activate inflammation (18). Antigen presentation by B cells to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells further contributes to a pathogenic role of IgM/IgG antibodies to facilitate crystallization of urate and leads to the phagocytosis of MSU crystals and sensing of NLRP3 inflammasome (20). However, MSU crystal deposition occurs in only 10% of hyperuricemic individuals, and the deposition does not necessarily lead to inflammation. Other factors should be involved to precipitate a gout attack (21), and certain preexisting metabolic risk factors may further potentiate the inflammation (22).
Our current study showed that obesity in women (including overweight and general obesity) and hypertriglyceridemia in men precipitated gouty arthritis even when the baseline sUA level was below the saturation point. An enhanced triglyceride lipolysis in adipose tissue is speculated to potentiate a gout event because engagement of fatty acids has been demonstrated in MSU crystal–induced gouty arthritis (9). Lipid sorting and engagement along with MSU crystals on the cell surface of dendritic cells or macrophages may trigger inflammation (23). Extracellular ATP, one of the danger signals released from adipose tissue, can also trigger inflammasome in gouty arthritis (20). Hypertrophic adipocytes in obesity are considered to be under constant stress. The increased stress and hypoxia (24) resulting in the release of free fatty acids and reactive oxygen species to initiate inflammation in adipose tissue can recruit more inflammatory monocytes to differentiate into classically activated macrophages (M1) (25, 26). Reciprocally, saturated fatty acids and proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor and IL-1β) synthesized from adipocytes may further sustain the activation of adipose tissue macrophages (27) to respond to soluble urate.
Our current study has provided population-based information on the contribution of metabolic factors in the development of gout. However, since sUA and BMI and triglycerides are closely correlated, it is possible that obese individuals with hypertriglyceridemia but without hyperuricemia at the time of their health examination will develop hyperuricemia in future years, which in turn would trigger the development of gout. Therefore, other than the possible indirect mechanism of triglyceride lipolysis in the adipose tissue mentioned above, hypertriglyceridemia and obesity may precipitate gouty arthritis by both mechanisms.
Several limitations of this study should be discussed. For example, the UA levels of the gout patients at the time of their attack were not available in the Taiwan NHI database, which can restrict our findings to be generalized. It has also been postulated that concurrent alcohol drinking or consumption of meat may increase sUA and free fatty acid levels temporarily during an acute gout episode (9). In the current study, alcohol drinking was only shown as a significant risk for gouty arthritis in older women with hyperuricemia, while a less prominent trend was noted in men. This may result from information biased by self-report, since most Taiwanese people are social drinkers who drink alcohol only on certain occasions. They may deny drinking alcohol or may have abstained, but will drink alcohol at some social event in subsequent years (28). Patients with hyperglycemia were shown to have a lower future risk of gout, which also agreed with a previous report hypothesizing that lower sUA levels and the risk of gout at the diabetic stage were due to the development of uricosuria from glycosuria (29). Other potential limitations of this study may include misclassification of outcome from the criteria for the gout definition and recall bias from an individual's history. Nevertheless, a large sample size and reasonably long observation period may overcome the aforementioned nondifferential biases.
Our current study reveals the impact of hypertriglyceridemia in men and obesity in women to potentiate sUA for gout development. Further studies are warranted to translate our epidemiologic findings into clinical practice.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Top of page
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION
- PATIENTS AND METHODS
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Acknowledgements
- REFERENCES
- Supporting Information
All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Pan had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study conception and design. Jiunn-Horng Chen, Pan, Chuang, Huang.
Acquisition of data. Jiunn-Horng Chen, Pan, Yeh, Pin-Yu Chen.
Analysis and interpretation of data. Jiunn-Horng Chen, Pan, Hsu, Hui-Chen Chen, Chang.