• 1
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project nationwide inpatient sample. United States Department of Health & Human Services. 2009. URL:
  • 2
    Medical devices and the public's health: the FDA 510(k) clearance process at 35 years. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2011.
  • 3
    Burns LR, Housman MG, Booth RE Jr, Koenig A. Implant vendors and hospitals: competing influences over product choice by orthopedic surgeons. Health Care Manage Rev 2009; 34: 218.
  • 4
    Wilson CB. Adoption of new surgical technology. BMJ 2006; 332: 1124.
  • 5
    Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. London: Department of Health; 2010.
  • 6
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 3846.
  • 7
    Maloney WJ. National joint replacement registries: has the time come? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83A: 15825.
  • 8
    Hockenberry JM, Weigel P, Auerbach A, Cram P. Financial payments by orthopedic device makers to orthopedic surgeons. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 175965.
  • 9
    Healy WL, Peterson RN. Department of Justice investigation of orthopaedic industry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1791805.
  • 10
    Fact sheet: Physician Payments Sunshine provisions in health care reform. Boston: Pew Prescription Project; 2010.
  • 11
    Kempton LB, Ankerson E, Wiater JM. A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 2496504.
  • 12
    Sandhu JS, Maschino AC, Vickers AJ. The surgical learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter procedures compared to typical surgeon experience. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 128590.
  • 13
    Sharkey PF, Sethuraman V, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Stiehl JB. Factors influencing choice of implants in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: perspectives of surgeons and patients. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 2817.
  • 14
    Katz JN, Wright EA, Wright J, Malchau H, Mahomed NN, Stedman M, et al. Twelve-year risk of revision following primary total hip replacement in the US Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 182532.
  • 15
    Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2732.
  • 16
    Childers R, Lipsett PA, Pawlik TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 62734.
  • 17
    Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 22216.
  • 18
    O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; Suppl: VAR6372.
  • 19
    Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA 2011; 306: 4207.
  • 20
    Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30: 699706.
  • 21
    Gramlich EP, Waitzfelder BE. Interactive video assists in clinical decision making. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37: 2015.
  • 22
    Von Knoch F, Malchau H. Why do we need a national joint replacement registry in the United States? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2009; 38: 5003.
  • 23
    Vidi VD, Matheny ME, Donnelly S, Resnic FS. An evaluation of a distributed medical device safety surveillance system: the DELTA network study. Contemp Clin Trials 2011; 32: 30917.