SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaro P. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. Santa Monica (CA): RAND; 2001.
  • 2
    Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986; 2: 5363.
  • 3
    Shekelle PG, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, Leape LL, Kamberg CJ, Park RE. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 188895.
  • 4
    Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health 1986; 76: 76672.
  • 5
    Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure). Developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2005; 112: e154235.
  • 6
    Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK, Deal C, Caplan L, Chen W, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 151526.
  • 7
    Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, Curtis JR, Kavanaugh AF, Kremer JM, et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 62539.
  • 8
    Perez-Ruiz F, Martin I, Canteli B. Ultrasonographic measurement of tophi as an outcome measure for chronic gout. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 188893.
  • 9
    Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 111621.
  • 10
    Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Ultrasonography shows active inflammation in clinically unaffected joints in chronic tophaceous gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60 Suppl: S565.
  • 11
    Wright SA, Filippucci E, McVeigh C, Grey A, McCarron M, Grassi W, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint in gout: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 85964.
  • 12
    Frediani B, Filippou G, Falsetti P, Lorenzini S, Baldi F, Acciai C, et al. Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease: ultrasonographic criteria proposed. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 63840.
  • 13
    Filippucci E, Scire CA, Delle SA, Iagnocco A, Riente L, Meenagh G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXV: sonographic assessment of the knee in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2010; 28: 25.
  • 14
    Puig JG, de Miguel E, Castillo MC, Rocha AL, Martinez MA, Torres RJ. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: impact of ultrasonography. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008; 27: 5925.
  • 15
    Blankstein A, Ganel A, Givon U, Mirovski Y, Chechick A. Ultrasonographic findings in patients with olecranon bursitis. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 56871.
  • 16
    Nalbant S, Corominas H, Hsu B, Chen LX, Schumacher HR, Kitumnuaypong T. Ultrasonography for assessment of subcutaneous nodules. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 11915.
  • 17
    Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 96671.
  • 18
    Hauzeur JP, Mathy L, De Maertelaer V. Comparison between clinical evaluation and ultrasonography in detecting hydrarthrosis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 26813.
  • 19
    Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Lawson CA, Goh E, Quinn MA, et al. The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 29323.
  • 20
    Eberhardt K, Fex E, Johnsson K, Geborek P. Hip involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 458.
  • 21
    Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, Palop MJ, Cabero F, Richi P, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 11624.
  • 22
    Parker L, Nazarian LN, Carrino JA, Morrison WB, Grimaldi G, Frangos AJ, et al. Musculoskeletal imaging: Medicare use, costs, and potential for cost substitution. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5: 1828.
  • 23
    Sivan M, Brown J, Brennan S, Bhakta B. A one-stop approach to the management of soft tissue and degenerative musculoskeletal conditions using clinic-based ultrasonography. Musculoskeletal Care 2011; 9: 638.
  • 24
    Rettenbacher T, Ennemoser S, Weirich H, Ulmer H, Hartig F, Klotz W, et al. Diagnostic imaging of gout: comparison of high-resolution US versus conventional x-ray. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 62130.
  • 25
    D'Agostino MA, Aegerter P, Bechara K, Salliot C, Judet O, Chimenti MS, et al. How to diagnose spondyloarthritis early? Accuracy of peripheral enthesitis detection by power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 143340.
  • 26
    De Miguel E, Munoz-Fernandez S, Castillo C, Cobo-Ibanez T, Martin-Mola E. Diagnostic accuracy of enthesis ultrasound in the diagnosis of early spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 4349.
  • 27
    De Miguel E, Cobo T, Munoz-Fernandez S, Naredo E, Uson J, Acebes JC, et al. Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 16974.
  • 28
    Farouk HM, Mostafa AA, Youssef SS, Elbeblawy MM, Assaf NY, Elokda el SE. Value of entheseal ultrasonography and serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in the preclinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 3: 714.
  • 29
    Munoz-Fernandez S, de Miguel E, Cobo-Ibanez T, Madero R, Ferreira A, Hidalgo MV, et al. Enthesis inflammation in recurrent acute anterior uveitis without spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 198590.
  • 30
    Gisondi P, Tinazzi I, El-Dalati G, Gallo M, Biasi D, Barbara LM, et al. Lower limb enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis without clinical signs of arthropathy: a hospital-based case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 2630.
  • 31
    Ruta S, Gutierrez M, Pena C, Garcia M, Arturi A, Filippucci E, et al. Prevalence of subclinical enthesopathy in patients with spondyloarthropathy: an ultrasound study. J Clin Rheumatol 2011; 17: 1822.
  • 32
    Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, Hasselquist M, Narvestad E, Szkudlarek M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8: R110.
  • 33
    Funck-Brentano T, Etchepare F, Joulin SJ, Gandjbakch F, Pensec VD, Cyteval C, et al. Benefits of ultrasonography in the management of early arthritis: a cross-sectional study of baseline data from the ESPOIR cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 15159.
  • 34
    Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Jensen KE, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8: R52.
  • 35
    Sheane BJ, Beddy P, O'Connor M, Miller S, Cunnane G. Targeted ultrasound of the fifth metatarsophalangeal joint in an early inflammatory arthritis cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 10048.
  • 36
    Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 210312.
  • 37
    Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, Werner C, Schirmer C, Detert J, et al. Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 595600.
  • 38
    Hoving JL, Buchbinder R, Hall S, Lawler G, Coombs P, McNealy S, et al. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, sonography, and radiography of the hand in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 66375.
  • 39
    Hermann KG, Backhaus M, Schneider U, Labs K, Loreck D, Zuhlsdorf S, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder joint: comparison of conventional radiography, ultrasound, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 333849.
  • 40
    Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Bohnen AM, Verhaar JA, Prins A, Ginai-Karamat AZ, Lameris JS. Sonography for hip joint effusion in adults with hip pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59: 17882.
  • 41
    Friedman S, Gruber MA. Ultrasonography of the hip in the evaluation of children with seronegative juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 62932.
  • 42
    Frosch M, Foell D, Ganser G, Roth J. Arthrosonography of hip and knee joints in the follow up of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 2424.
  • 43
    Terjesen T, Osthus P. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of transient synovitis of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11: 60813.
  • 44
    Bialik V, Volpin G, Jerushalmi J, Stein H. Sonography in the diagnosis of painful hips. Int Orthop 1991; 15: 1559.
  • 45
    Bickerstaff DR, Neal LM, Booth AJ, Brennan PO, Bell MJ. Ultrasound examination of the irritable hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 54953.
  • 46
    Choi YS, Lee SM, Song BY, Paik SH, Yoon YK. Dynamic sonography of external snapping hip syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 7538.
  • 47
    Deslandes M, Guillin R, Cardinal E, Hobden R, Bureau NJ. The snapping iliopsoas tendon: new mechanisms using dynamic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 57681.
  • 48
    Pelsser V, Cardinal E, Hobden R, Aubin B, Lafortune M. Extraarticular snapping hip: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 6773.
  • 49
    Connell DA, Bass C, Sykes CA, Young D, Edwards E. Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus tendinopathy. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 133947.
  • 50
    Kim SM, Shin MJ, Kim KS, Ahn JM, Cho KH, Chang JS, et al. Imaging features of ischial bursitis with an emphasis on ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31: 6316.
  • 51
    Fearon AM, Scarvell JM, Cook JL, Smith PN. Does ultrasound correlate with surgical or histologic findings in greater trochanteric pain syndrome? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 183844.
  • 52
    Sofka CM, Adler RS, Danon MA. Sonography of the acetabular labrum: visualization of labral injuries during intra-articular injections. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 13216.
  • 53
    Noh KH, Moon YL, Jacir AM, Kim KH, Gorthi V. Sonographic probe induced tenderness for lateral epicondylitis: an accurate technique to confirm the location of the lesion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18: 8369.
  • 54
    Levin D, Nazarian LN, Miller TT, O'Kane PL, Feld RI, Parker L, et al. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: US findings. Radiology 2005; 237: 2304.
  • 55
    Park GY. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography for clinical medial epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 73842.
  • 56
    Budovec JJ, Sudakoff GS, Dzwierzynski WW, Matloub HS, Sanger JR. Sonographic differentiation of digital tendon rupture from adhesive scarring after primary surgical repair. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 5249.
  • 57
    Grassi W, Tittarelli E, Blasetti P, Pirani O, Cervini C. Finger tendon involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation with high-frequency sonography. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 78694.
  • 58
    Breidahl WH, Stafford Johnson DB, Newman JS, Adler RS. Power Doppler sonography in tenosynovitis: significance of the peritendinous hypoechoic rim. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 1037.
  • 59
    Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Hubach PC, Klasens JH, Algra PR, Bijlsma JW. Comparison of sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of partial tears of finger extensor tendons in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39: 5562.
  • 60
    Gisslen K, Gyulai C, Soderman K, Alfredson H. High prevalence of jumper's knee and sonographic changes in Swedish elite junior volleyball players compared to matched controls. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 298301.
  • 61
    Terslev L, Qvistgaard E, Torp-Pedersen S, Laetgaard J, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H. Ultrasound and power Doppler findings in jumper's knee: preliminary observations. Eur J Ultrasound 2001; 13: 1839.
  • 62
    Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, Coleman BD, Griffiths L. Asymptomatic hypoechoic regions on patellar tendon ultrasound: a 4-year clinical and ultrasound followup of 46 tendons. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11: 3217.
  • 63
    Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, Purdam CR, Griffiths L. Prospective imaging study of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy in elite junior basketball players. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 4739.
  • 64
    Malliaras P, Cook J. Patellar tendons with normal imaging and pain: change in imaging and pain status over a volleyball season. Clin J Sport Med 2006; 16: 38891.
  • 65
    Premkumar A, Perry MB, Dwyer AJ, Gerber LH, Johnson D, Venzon D, et al. Sonography and MR imaging of posterior tibial tendinopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 22332.
  • 66
    Leung JL, Griffith JF. Sonography of chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a case-control study. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36: 2732.
  • 67
    Blankstein A, Cohen I, Diamant L, Heim M, Dudkiewicz I, Israeli A, et al. Achilles tendon pain and related pathologies: diagnosis by ultrasonography. Isr Med Assoc J 2001; 3: 5758.
  • 68
    Yang X, Pugh ND, Coleman DP, Nokes LD. Are Doppler studies a useful method of assessing neovascularization in human Achilles tendinopathy? A systematic review and suggestions for optimizing machine settings. J Med Eng Technol 2010; 35: 36572.
  • 69
    McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Barrett JT, Menz HB, Bird AR. Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2: 32.
  • 70
    Bianchi S, Abdelwahab IF, Zwass A, Giacomello P. Ultrasonographic evaluation of wrist ganglia. Skeletal Radiol 1994; 23: 2013.
  • 71
    Bianchi S, Abdelwahab IF, Zwass A, Calogera R, Banderali A, Brovero P, et al. Sonographic findings in examination of digital ganglia: retrospective study. Clin Radiol 1993; 48: 457.
  • 72
    D'Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M. Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 52333.
  • 73
    Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Baccano G, Ceccarelli F, Sabatini E, Valesini G. Sonographic-detected joint effusion compared with physical examination in the assessment of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 155963.
  • 74
    Klauser AS, Wipfler E, Dejaco C, Moriggl B, Duftner C, Schirmer M. Diagnostic values of history and clinical examination to predict ultrasound signs of chronic and acute enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008; 26: 54853.
  • 75
    Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H, McInnes IB, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 90510.
  • 76
    De Simone C, Guerriero C, Giampetruzzi AR, Costantini M, Di GF, Amerio P. Achilles tendinitis in psoriasis: clinical and sonographic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 21722.
  • 77
    Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Salaffi F, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Differential diagnosis between rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: the value of ultrasound findings at metacarpophalangeal joints level. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 11114.
  • 78
    Wiell C, Szkudlarek M, Hasselquist M, Moller JM, Vestergaard A, Norregaard J, et al. Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and clinical assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in fingers and toes of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9: R119.
  • 79
    Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Rubaltelli L, Rigon C, De Candia A, Tregnaghi A, et al. Long-term sonographic follow-up of rheumatoid and psoriatic proliferative knee joint synovitis. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 15563.
  • 80
    Fournie B, Margarit-Coll N, Champetier de Ribes TL, Zabraniecki L, Jouan A, Vincent V, et al. Extrasynovial ultrasound abnormalities in the psoriatic finger: prospective comparative power-Doppler study versus rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73: 52731.
  • 81
    Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, van den Bruel A, Weijers RE, de Bie RA, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with suspected subacromial disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 161625.
  • 82
    Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1166.
  • 83
    Seitz AL, Michener LA. Ultrasonographic measures of subacromial space in patients with rotator cuff disease: a systematic review. J Clin Ultrasound 2011; 39: 14654.
  • 84
    Strunk J, Lange U, Kurten B, Schmidt KL, Neeck G. Doppler sonographic findings in the long bicipital tendon sheath in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as compared with patients with degenerative diseases of the shoulder. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 182832.
  • 85
    Wu CH, Wang YC, Wang HK, Chen WS, Wang TG. Evaluating displacement of the coracoacromial ligament in painful shoulders of overhead athletes through dynamic ultrasonographic examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 27882.
  • 86
    Sommer R, Valen GJ, Ori Y, Weinstein T, Katz M, Hendel D, et al. Sonographic features of dialysis-related amyloidosis of the shoulder. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 76570.
  • 87
    Shimizu M, Okamura K, Yoshiura K, Ohyama Y, Nakamura S, Kinukawa N. Sonographic diagnostic criteria for screening Sjögren's syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 8593.
  • 88
    Makula E, Pokorny G, Kiss M, Voros E, Kovacs L, Kovacs A, et al. The place of magnetic resonance and ultrasonographic examinations of the parotid gland in the diagnosis and follow-up of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39: 97104.
  • 89
    Poul JH, Brown JE, Davies J. Retrospective study of the effectiveness of high-resolution ultrasound compared with sialography in the diagnosis of Sjogren's syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 3927.
  • 90
    Kawamura H, Taniguchi N, Itoh K, Kano S. Salivary gland echography in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 50510.
  • 91
    Takashima S, Morimoto S, Tomiyama N, Takeuchi N, Ikezoe J, Kozuka T. Sjogren syndrome: comparison of sialography and ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20: 99109.
  • 92
    Chikui T, Okamura K, Tokumori K, Nakamura S, Shimizu M, Koga M, et al. Quantitative analyses of sonographic images of the parotid gland in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 61722.
  • 93
    Giuseppetti GM, Argalia G, Salera D, Ranaldi R, Danieli G, Cappelli M. Ultrasonographic contrast-enhanced study of sicca syndrome. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 22532.
  • 94
    Niemela RK, Takalo R, Paakko E, Suramo I, Paivansalo M, Salo T, et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren's syndrome: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography of parotid glands. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 8759.
  • 95
    De Vita S, Lorenzon G, Rossi G, Sabella M, Fossaluzza V. Salivary gland echography in primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1992; 10: 3516.
  • 96
    Yonetsu K, Takagi Y, Sumi M, Nakamura T, Eguchi K. Sonography as a replacement for sialography for the diagnosis of salivary glands affected by Sjögren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 2767.
  • 97
    Makula E, Pokorny G, Rajtar M, Kiss I, Kovacs A, Kovacs L. Parotid gland ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in primary Sjögren's syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 9727.
  • 98
    El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 88795.
  • 99
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Iagnocco A, Luccioli F, Ramonda R, Sabatini E, et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a comparison with contrast sialography and scintigraphy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 12449.
  • 100
    Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 108994.
  • 101
    Roll SC, Case-Smith J, Evans KD. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography vs. electromyography in carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of literature. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 153953.
  • 102
    Nakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 17138.
  • 103
    Altinok T, Baysal O, Karakas HM, Sigirci A, Alkan A, Kayhan A, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of mild and moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 91625.
  • 104
    Moran L, Perez M, Esteban A, Bellon J, Arranz B, del Cerro M. Sonographic measurement of cross-sectional area of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37: 12531.
  • 105
    Impink BG, Gagnon D, Collinger JL, Boninger ML. Repeatability of ultrasonographic median nerve measures. Muscle Nerve 2010; 41: 76773.
  • 106
    Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 191421.
  • 107
    Wang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, Hung JW, Cheung SM, Pong YP. Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J 2008; 31: 46976.
  • 108
    Yesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N, Koyuncuoglu HR, Oyar O, Guler K, et al. The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 9105.
  • 109
    Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 6814.
  • 110
    Naranjo A, Ojeda S, Mendoza D, Francisco F, Quevedo JC, Erausquin C. What is the diagnostic value of ultrasonography compared to physical evaluation in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 8539.
  • 111
    Kurca E, Nosal V, Grofik M, Sivak S, Turcanova-Koprusakova M, Kucera P. Single parameter wrist ultrasonography as a first-line screening examination in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Bratisl Lek Listy 2008; 109: 1779.
  • 112
    Lee CH, Kim TK, Yoon ES, Dhong ES. Correlation of high-resolution ultrasonographic findings with the clinical symptoms and electrodiagnostic data in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 203.
  • 113
    Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Bussemaker FE, de Waard JW, Bijlsma JW. Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 629.
  • 114
    Pastare D, Therimadasamy AK, Lee E, Wilder-Smith EP. Sonography versus nerve conduction studies in patients referred with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37: 38993.
  • 115
    Kwon BC, Jung KI, Baek GH. Comparison of sonography and electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 6571.
  • 116
    Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, Faschingbauer R, Guerra F, Martinoli C, Gabl MF, et al. Bifid median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment with US cross-sectional area measurement. Radiology 2011; 259: 80815.
  • 117
    Nakamichi K, Tachibana S. Restricted motion of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 1995; 20: 4604.
  • 118
    Karadag YS, Karadag O, Cicekli E, Ozturk S, Kiraz S, Ozbakir S, et al. Severity of carpal tunnel syndrome assessed with high frequency ultrasonography. Rheumatol Int 2010; 30: 7615.
  • 119
    Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Tilki HE, Nural MS, Sunter T. Ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison with electrophysiological stage and motor unit number estimate. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35: 3448.
  • 120
    Padua L, Pazzaglia C, Caliandro P, Granata G, Foschini M, Briani C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: ultrasound, neurophysiology, clinical and patient-oriented assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 20649.
  • 121
    Kaymak B, Ozcakar L, Cetin A, Candan CM, Akinci A, Hascelik Z. A comparison of the benefits of sonography and electrophysiologic measurements as predictors of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 7438.
  • 122
    Naranjo A, Ojeda S, Arana V, Baeta P, Fernandez-Palacios J, Garcia-Duque O, et al. Usefulness of clinical findings, nerve conduction studies and ultrasonography to predict response to surgical release in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: 78693.
  • 123
    Mondelli M, Filippou G, Aretini A, Frediani B, Reale F. Ultrasonography before and after surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome and relationship with clinical and electrophysiological findings: a new outcome predictor? Scand J Rheumatol 2008; 37: 21924.
  • 124
    Naranjo A, Ojeda S, Rua-Figueroa I, Garcia-Duque O, Fernandez-Palacios J, Carmona L. Limited value of ultrasound assessment in patients with poor outcome after carpal tunnel release surgery. Scand J Rheumatol 2010; 39: 40912.
  • 125
    Volpe A, Rossato G, Bottanelli M, Marchetta A, Caramaschi P, Bambara LM, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 1098101.
  • 126
    Bayrak AO, Bayrak IK, Turker H, Elmali M, Nural MS. Ultrasonography in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of cross-sectional area and swelling ratio with electrophysiological severity. Muscle Nerve 2010; 41: 6616.
  • 127
    Kutlay M, Colak A, Simsek H, Ozturk E, Senol MG, Topuz K, et al. Use of ultrasonography in ulnar nerve entrapment surgery: a prospective study. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32: 22532.
  • 128
    Beekman R, Schoemaker MC, Van Der Plas JP, Van Den Berg LH, Franssen H, Wokke JH, et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology 2004; 62: 76773.
  • 129
    Nagaoka M, Matsuzaki H. Ultrasonography in tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 103540.
  • 130
    Cunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G, Bracewell C, Isaacs J, Platt P, et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 18629.
  • 131
    Wiler JL, Costantino TG, Filippone L, Satz W. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and standard landmark techniques for knee arthrocentesis. J Emerg Med 2010; 39: 7682.
  • 132
    Im SH, Lee SC, Park YB, Cho SR, Kim JC. Feasibility of sonography for intra-articular injections in the knee through a medial patellar portal. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 146570.
  • 133
    Daley EL, Bajaj S, Bisson LJ, Cole BJ. Improving injection accuracy of the elbow, knee, and shoulder: does injection site and imaging make a difference? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 65662.
  • 134
    Sabeti-Aschraf M, Lemmerhofer B, Lang S, Schmidt M, Funovics PT, Ziai P, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of the acromioclavicular joint infiltration: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 2925.
  • 135
    Peck E, Lai JK, Pawlina W, Smith J. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided acromioclavicular joint injections: a cadaveric study. PM R 2010; 2: 81721.
  • 136
    Finnoff JT, Nutz DJ, Henning PT, Hollman JH, Smith J. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus unguided pes anserinus bursa injections. PM R 2010; 2: 7329.
  • 137
    Lee DH, Han SB, Park JW, Lee SH, Kim KW, Jeong WK. Sonographically guided tendon sheath injections are more accurate than blind injections: implications for trigger finger treatment. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 197203.
  • 138
    Reach JS, Easley ME, Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA. Accuracy of ultrasound guided injections in the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30: 23942.
  • 139
    Khosla S, Thiele R, Baumhauer JF. Ultrasound guidance for intra-articular injections of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30: 88690.
  • 140
    Wisniewski SJ, Smith J, Patterson DG, Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. Ultrasound-guided versus nonguided tibiotalar joint and sinus tarsi injections: a cadaveric study. PM R 2010; 2: 27781.
  • 141
    Smith J, Finnoff JT, Levy BA, Lai JK. Sonographically guided proximal tibiofibular joint injection: technique and accuracy. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 7839.
  • 142
    Muir JJ, Curtiss HM, Hollman J, Smith J, Finnoff JT. The accuracy of ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided peroneal tendon sheath injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 56471.
  • 143
    Rutten MJ, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ, de Waal Malefijt MC. Injection of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa: blind or ultrasound-guided? Acta Orthop 2007; 78: 2547.
  • 144
    Parra DA, Chan M, Krishnamurthy G, Spiegel L, Amaral JG, Temple MJ, et al. Use and accuracy of US guidance for image-guided injections of the temporomandibular joints in children with arthritis. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 1498504.
  • 145
    Hartung W, Ross CJ, Straub R, Feuerbach S, Scholmerich J, Fleck M, et al. Ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in patients with established sacroiliitis: precise IA injection verified by MRI scanning does not predict clinical outcome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 147982.
  • 146
    Pekkafahli MZ, Kiralp MZ, Basekim CC, Silit E, Mutlu H, Ozturk E, et al. Sacroiliac joint injections performed with sonographic guidance. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 5539.
  • 147
    Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Walch C, Schatzer R, Ploner F, Gruber H. Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-controlled facet joint injections in the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007; 32: 31722.
  • 148
    Shim JK, Moon JC, Yoon KB, Kim WO, Yoon DM. Ultrasound-guided lumbar medial-branch block: a clinical study with fluoroscopy control. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 4514.
  • 149
    Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Bodner G, Freund MC, Gruber H, Maurer H, et al. Ultrasound-guided facet joint injections in the middle to lower cervical spine: a CT-controlled sonoanatomic study. Clin J Pain 2006; 22: 53843.
  • 150
    Sibbitt WL Jr, Band PA, Chavez-Chiang NR, DeLea SL, Norton HE, Bankhurst AD. A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection of inflammatory arthritis. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 25263.
  • 151
    Sibbitt WL Jr, Peisajovich A, Michael AA, Park KS, Sibbitt RR, Band PA, et al. Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections? J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 1892902.
  • 152
    Luz KR, Furtado RN, Nunes CC, Rosenfeld A, Fernandes AR, Natour J. Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections in the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1198200.
  • 153
    Ucuncu F, Capkin E, Karkucak M, Ozden G, Cakirbay H, Tosun M, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of landmark-guided injections and ultrasonography guided injections for shoulder pain. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 7869.
  • 154
    Lee HJ, Lim KB, Kim DY, Lee KT. Randomized controlled trial for efficacy of intra-articular injection for adhesive capsulitis: ultrasonography-guided versus blind technique. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 19972002.
  • 155
    Naredo E, Cabero F, Beneyto P, Cruz A, Mondejar B, Uson J, et al. A randomized comparative study of short term response to blind injection versus sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients with painful shoulder. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 30814.
  • 156
    Chen MJ, Lew HL, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Lin WC, Tang SF, et al. Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 315.
  • 157
    Sibbitt W, Kettwich L, Band P, Chavez-Chiang N, Delea S, Haseler L, et al. Does ultrasound guidance improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis and corticosteroid injection of the knee? Scand J Rheumatol 2012; 41: 6672.
  • 158
    Sofka CM, Adler RS, Ciavarra GA, Pavlov H. Ultrasound-guided interdigital neuroma injections: short-term clinical outcomes after a single percutaneous injection. Preliminary results. HSS J 2007; 3: 449.
  • 159
    Yucel I, Yazici B, Degirmenci E, Erdogmus B, Dogan S. Comparison of ultrasound-, palpation-, and scintigraphy-guided steroid injections in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 695701.
  • 160
    Kane D, Greaney T, Shanahan M, Duffy G, Bresnihan B, Gibney R, et al. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic plantar fasciitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001; 40: 10028.
  • 161
    Micu MC, Bogdan GD, Fodor D. Steroid injection for hip osteoarthritis: efficacy under ultrasound guidance. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 14904.
  • 162
    Smith J, Hurdle MF, Weingarten TN. Accuracy of sonographically guided intra-articular injections in the native adult hip. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 32935.
  • 163
    Atchia I, Kane D, Reed MR, Isaacs JD, Birrell F. Efficacy of a single ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1106.
  • 164
    Givon U, Liberman B, Schindler A, Blankstein A, Ganel A. Treatment of septic arthritis of the hip joint by repeated ultrasound-guided aspirations. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24: 26670.
  • 165
    Hill SA, MacLarnon JC, Nag D. Ultrasound-guided aspiration for transient synovitis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 8523.
  • 166
    Sofka CM, Saboeiro G, Adler RS. Ultrasound-guided adult hip injections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 11213.
  • 167
    Di Sante L, Paoloni M, Ioppolo F, Dimaggio M, Di Renzo S, Santilli V. Ultrasound-guided aspiration and corticosteroid injection of Baker's cysts in knee osteoarthritis: a prospective observational study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 89: 9705.
  • 168
    Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Wu JJ, Hsu CC, Tiu CM, Chang CY. High-resolution ultrasonography of the musculoskeletal system: analysis of 369 cases. J Med Ultrasound 1999; 7: 2128.
  • 169
    Bianchi S, Zwass A, Abdelwahab IF, Mazzola CG, Olivieri M, Rettagliata F. Sonographic evaluation of intramuscular ganglia. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 2356.
  • 170
    Macmahon PJ, Brennan DD, Duke D, Forde S, Eustace SJ. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of meniscal cysts: preliminary clinical experience. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 6837.
  • 171
    Gaspari RJ, Resop D, Mendoza M, Kang T, Blehar D. A randomized controlled trial of incision and drainage versus ultrasonographically guided needle aspiration for skin abscesses and the effect of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 48391.
  • 172
    Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Song JY, Hong SJ, Myung JS, Choi WS, et al. Skin and soft tissue infections: experience over a five-year period and clinical usefulness of ultrasonography-guided gun biopsy-based culture. Scand J Infect Dis 2011; 43: 8706.
  • 173
    McShane JM, Nazarian LN, Harwood MI. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for treatment of common extensor tendinosis in the elbow. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 12819.
  • 174
    Zhu J, Hu B, Xing C, Li J. Ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive, percutaneous needle puncture treatment for tennis elbow. Adv Ther 2008; 25: 10316.
  • 175
    Housner JA, Jacobson JA, Morag Y, Pujalte GG, Northway RM, Boon TA. Should ultrasound-guided needle fenestration be considered as a treatment option for recalcitrant patellar tendinopathy? A retrospective study of 47 cases. Clin J Sport Med 2010; 20: 48890.
  • 176
    Yoo JC, Koh KH, Park WH, Park JC, Kim SM, Yoon YC. The outcome of ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection in calcific tendinitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 596600.
  • 177
    Aina R, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ, Aubin B, Brassard P. Calcific shoulder tendinitis: treatment with modified US-guided fine-needle technique. Radiology 2001; 221: 45561.
  • 178
    Bradley M, Bhamra MS, Robson MJ. Ultrasound guided aspiration of symptomatic supraspinatus calcific deposits. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 7169.
  • 179
    Lin JT, Adler RS, Bracilovic A, Cooper G, Sofka C, Lutz GE. Clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided aspiration and lavage in calcific tendinosis of the shoulder. HSS J 2007; 3: 99105.
  • 180
    Farin PU, Rasanen H, Jaroma H, Harju A. Rotator cuff calcifications: treatment with ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle aspiration and lavage. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 5514.
  • 181
    Krasny C, Enenkel M, Aigner N, Wlk M, Landsiedl F. Ultrasound-guided needling combined with shock-wave therapy for the treatment of calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 5017.
  • 182
    De Zordo T, Ahmad N, Odegaard F, Girtler MT, Jaschke W, Klauser AS, et al. US-guided therapy of calcific tendinopathy: clinical and radiological outcome assessment in shoulder and non-shoulder tendons. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32 Suppl: S11723.
  • 183
    Del Cura JL, Torre I, Zabala R, Legorburu A. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle lavage in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: short- and long-term results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: W12834.
  • 184
    Zhu J, Jiang Y, Hu Y, Xing C, Hu B. Evaluating the long-term effect of ultrasound-guided needle puncture without aspiration on calcifying supraspinatus tendinitis. Adv Ther 2008; 25: 122934.
  • 185
    DeLea SL, Chavez-Chiang NR, Poole JL, Norton HE, Sibbitt WL Jr, Bankhurst AD. Sonographically guided hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection for scleroderma hand. Clin Rheumatol 2011; 30: 80513.
  • 186
    Van Vugt RM, van Dalen A, Bijlsma JW. Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy of the wrist. Scand J Rheumatol 1997; 26: 2124.
  • 187
    Koski JM, Helle M. Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy using portal and forceps. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 9269.
  • 188
    Scire CA, Epis O, Codullo V, Humby F, Morbini P, Manzo A, et al. Immunohistological assessment of the synovial tissue in small joints in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a minimally invasive ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy procedure. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9: R101.
  • 189
    Fukae J, Kon Y, Henmi M, Sakamoto F, Narita A, Shimizu M, et al. Change of synovial vascularity in a single finger joint assessed by power Doppler sonography correlated with radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of a novel quantitative score with a semiquantitative score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 65763.
  • 190
    Stone M, Salonen D, Lax M, Payne U, Lapp V, Inman R. Clinical and imaging correlates of response to treatment with infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 160514.
  • 191
    Larche MJ, Seymour M, Lim A, Eckersley RJ, Petavy F, Chiesa F, et al. Quantitative power Doppler ultrasonography is a sensitive measure of metacarpophalangeal joint synovial vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis and declines significantly following a 2-week course of oral low-dose corticosteroids. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 2493501.
  • 192
    Jimenez-Palop M, Naredo E, Humbrado L, Medina J, Uson J, Francisco F, et al. Ultrasonographic monitoring of response to therapy in polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 87982.
  • 193
    Teh J, Stevens K, Williamson L, Leung J, McNally EG. Power Doppler ultrasound of rheumatoid synovitis: quantification of therapeutic response. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 8759.
  • 194
    Filippucci E, Farina A, Carotti M, Salaffi F, Grassi W. Grey scale and power Doppler sonographic changes induced by intra-articular steroid injection treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 7403.
  • 195
    Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Rogind H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, et al. Effects of treatment with etanercept (Enbrel, TNRF:Fc) on rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 17881.
  • 196
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Manganelli P, Filippucci E, Giuseppetti GM, Grassi W. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography of knee synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of therapeutic response. Clin Rheumatol 2004; 23: 28590.
  • 197
    Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS. Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1996; 198: 5824.
  • 198
    D'Agostino MA, Ayral X, Baron G, Ravaud P, Breban M, Dougados M. Impact of ultrasound imaging on local corticosteroid injections of symptomatic ankle, hind-, and mid-foot in chronic inflammatory diseases. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 28492.
  • 199
    Naredo E, Batlle-Gualda E, Garcia-Vivar ML, Garcia-Aparicio AM, Fernandez-Sueiro JL, Fernandez-Prada M, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonography assessment of entheses in spondyloarthropathies: response to therapy of entheseal abnormalities. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 21107.
  • 200
    Fiocco U, Ferro F, Vezzu M, Cozzi L, Checchetto C, Sfriso P, et al. Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 899905.
  • 201
    Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, Carmona L, Garrido J. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 224856.
  • 202
    Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, Cosgrove DO, Blomley MJ, Marsters PA, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 110716.
  • 203
    Hammer HB, Haavardsholm EA, Boyesen P, Kvien TK. Bone erosions at the distal ulna detected by ultrasonography are associated with structural damage assessed by conventional radiography and MRI: a study of patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 15302.
  • 204
    Hammer HB, Sveinsson M, Kongtorp AK, Kvien TK. A 78-joints ultrasonographic assessment is associated with clinical assessments and is highly responsive to improvement in a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting adalimumab treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 134951.
  • 205
    Ribbens C, Andre B, Marcelis S, Kaye O, Mathy L, Bonnet V, et al. Rheumatoid hand joint synovitis: gray-scale and power Doppler US quantifications following anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment. Pilot study. Radiology 2003; 229: 5629.
  • 206
    Hammer HB, Kvien TK. Ultrasonography shows significant improvement in wrist and ankle tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab. Scand J Rheumatol 2011; 40: 17882.
  • 207
    Iagnocco A, Filippucci E, Perella C, Ceccarelli F, Cassara E, Alessandri C, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring of response to adalimumab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 3540.
  • 208
    Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Salaffi F, Cerioni A, Valesini G, Grassi W. Power Doppler sonography monitoring of synovial perfusion at the wrist joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 14337.
  • 209
    Kamishima T, Sagawa A, Tanimura K, Shimizu M, Matsuhashi M, Shinohara M, et al. Semi-quantitative analysis of rheumatoid finger joint synovitis using power Doppler ultrasonography: when to perform follow-up study after treatment consisting mainly of antitumor necrosis factor α agent. Skeletal Radiol 2010; 39: 45765.
  • 210
    Hau M, Kneitz C, Tony HP, Keberle M, Jahns R, Jenett M. High resolution ultrasound detects a decrease in pannus vascularisation of small finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment with soluble tumour necrosis factor α receptor (etanercept). Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 558.
  • 211
    Shio K, Homma F, Kanno Y, Yamadera Y, Ohguchi Y, Nishimaki T, et al. Doppler sonographic comparative study on usefulness of synovial vascularity between knee and metacarpophalangeal joints for evaluation of articular inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Mod Rheumatol 2006; 16: 2205.
  • 212
    Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Hammer HB, Boyesen P, Boonen A, van der Heijde D, et al. Monitoring anti-TNFα treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: responsiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the dominant wrist joint compared with conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 15729.
  • 213
    Ziswiler HR, Aeberli D, Villiger PM, Moller B. High-resolution ultrasound confirms reduced synovial hyperplasia following rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 93943.
  • 214
    Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1194201.
  • 215
    Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Filippucci E, Atagunduz P, Akdogan A, Kalyoncu U, et al. Monitoring Achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-α antagonist therapy: an ultrasound study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 57882.
  • 216
    Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, d'Agostino MA. A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 205562.
  • 217
    Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Karim Z, et al. Disease remission state in patients treated with the combination of tumor necrosis factor blockade and methotrexate or with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a clinical and imaging comparative study. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 191522.
  • 218
    Ozgocmen S, Ozdemir H, Kiris A, Bozgeyik Z, Ardicoglu O. Clinical evaluation and power Doppler sonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for ongoing synovial inflammation in clinical remission. South Med J 2008; 101: 2405.
  • 219
    Senabre JM, Rosas JC, Santos-Ramirez C, Santos-Soler G, Barber X, Llahi N, et al. Evaluation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission with 12 joints ultrasonography: preliminary results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62 Suppl: S729.
  • 220
    Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Wakefield R, et al. Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 7928.
  • 221
    Balsa A, de Miguel E, Castillo C, Peiteado D, Martin-Mola E. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessment of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 68390.
  • 222
    Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, Conaghan PG, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 376173.
  • 223
    Varsamidis K, Varsamidou E, Tjetjis V, Mavropoulos G. Doppler sonography in assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 73943.
  • 224
    Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, Epis O, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 10927.
  • 225
    Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G. Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1725.
  • 226
    Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M, Karim Z, Hensor EM, Conaghan P, et al. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 131621.
  • 227
    Foltz V, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, Rosenberg C, Tanguy ML, Rozenberg S, et al. Power Doppler ultrasound, but not low-field magnetic resonance imaging, predicts relapse and radiographic disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low levels of disease activity. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 6776.
  • 228
    Arida A, Kyprianou M, Kanakis M, Sfikakis PP. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in giant cell arteritis: a second meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 44.
  • 229
    Ball EL, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Gohil R, Clarke JM. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 176571.
  • 230
    De Miguel E, Castillo C, Rodriguez A, de Agustin JJ. Learning and reliability of colour Doppler ultrasound in giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: S538.
  • 231
    Seagger R, Bunker T, Hamer P. Surgeon-operated ultrasonography in a one-stop shoulder clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93: 52831.
  • 232
    Dasgupta B, Cimmino MA, Kremers HM, Schmidt WA, Schirmer M, Salvarani C, et al. 2012 provisional classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 94354.