SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Schneeweiss S, Avorn J.A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics.J Clin Epidemiol2005;58:32337.
  • 2
    Goldfield N, Villani J.The use of administrative data as the first step in the continuous quality improvement process.Am J Med Qual1996;11:S358.
  • 3
    Schwartz RM, Gagnon DE, Muri JH, Zhao QR, Kellogg R.Administrative data for quality improvement.Pediatrics1999;103:291301.
  • 4
    Ladouceur M, Rahme E, Pineau CA, Joseph L.Robustness of prevalence estimates derived from misclassified data from administrative databases.Biometrics2007;63:2729.
  • 5
    Lin KJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S.Systematic review of peptic ulcer disease incidence rates: do studies without validation provide reliable estimates?Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2011;20:71828.
  • 6
    Sorensen HT, Sabroe S, Olsen J.A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research.Int J Epidemiol1996;25:43542.
  • 7
    Benchimol EI, Manuel DG, To T, Griffiths AM, Rabeneck L, Guttmann A.Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data.J Clin Epidemiol2011;64:8219.
  • 8
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.J Clin Epidemiol2009;62:100612.
  • 9
    Medical Subject Headings.1999. URL: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/.
  • 10
    Embase. Elsevier Inc.2010. URL: http://www.info.embase.com/.
  • 11
    Spasoff R.Epidemiologic methods for health policy.New York:Oxford University Press;1999.
  • 12
    Shortliffe E, Cimino J.Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 3rd ed.New York:Springer;2006.
  • 13
    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al, for the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.Ann Intern Med2003;138:W112.
  • 14
    Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J.Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.BMC Med Res Methodol2006;6:9.
  • 15
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al.The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum1988;31:31524.
  • 16
    Singh JA, Holmgren AR, Noorbaloochi S.Accuracy of veterans administration databases for a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2004;51:9527.
  • 17
    Singh JA, Holmgren AR, Krug H, Noorbaloochi S.Accuracy of the diagnoses of spondylarthritides in veterans affairs medical center databases.Arthritis Rheum2007;57:64855.
  • 18
    Katz JN, Barrett J, Liang MH, Bacon AM, Kaplan H, Kieval RI, et al.Sensitivity and positive predictive value of Medicare Part B physician claims for rheumatologic diagnoses and procedures.Arthritis Rheum1997;40:1594600.
  • 19
    Bernatsky S, Linehan T, Hanly JG.The accuracy of administrative data diagnoses of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.J Rheumatol2011;38:16126.
  • 20
    Fowles JB, Lawthers AG, Weiner JP, Garnick DW, Petrie DS, Palmer RH.Agreement between physicians' office records and Medicare Part B claims data.Health Care Financ Rev1995;16:18999.
  • 21
    Rector TS, Wickstrom SL, Shah M, Thomas Greeenlee N, Rheault P, Rogowski J, et al.Specificity and sensitivity of claims-based algorithms for identifying members of Medicare+Choice health plans that have chronic medical conditions.Health Serv Res2004;39:183957.
  • 22
    Lix L, Yogendran M, Burchill C, Metge C, McKeen N, Moore D, et al.Defining and validating chronic diseases: an administrative data approach.Winnipeg:Manitoba Centre for Health Policy;2006.
  • 23
    Lix L, Yogendran M, Mann J.Defining and validating chronic diseases. An administrative data approach: an update with ICD-10-CA.Winnipeg:Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba;2008.
  • 24
    Singh J.Discordance between self-report of physician diagnosis and administrative database diagnosis of arthritis and its predictors.J Rheum2009;36:185860.
  • 25
    Allebeck P, Ljungstrom K, Allander E.Rheumatoid arthritis in a medical information system: how valid is the diagnosis?Scand J Soc Med1983;11:2732.
  • 26
    Tennis P, Bombardier C, Malcolm E, Downey W.Validity of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses listed in the Saskatchewan Hospital Separations Database.J Clin Epidemiol1993;46:67583.
  • 27
    Gabriel SE.The sensitivity and specificity of computerized databases for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum1994;37:8213.
  • 28
    Harrold LR, Yood RA, Andrade SE, Reed JI, Cernieux J, Straus W, et al.Evaluating the predictive value of osteoarthritis diagnoses in an administrative database.Arthritis Rheum2000;43:18815.
  • 29
    Losina E, Barrett J, Baron JA, Katz JN.Accuracy of Medicare claims data for rheumatologic diagnoses in total hip replacement recipients.J Clin Epidemiol2003;56:5159.
  • 30
    Thomas SL, Edwards CJ, Smeeth L, Cooper C, Hall AJ.How accurate are diagnoses for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the general practice research database?Arthritis Rheum2008;59:131421.
  • 31
    Hakala M, Pollanen R, Nieminen P.The ARA 1987 revised criteria select patients with clinical rheumatoid arthritis from a population based cohort of subjects with chronic rheumatic diseases registered for drug reimbursement.J Rheumatol1993;20:16748.
  • 32
    Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM.A mathematical model that improves the validity of osteoarthritis diagnoses obtained from a computerized diagnostic database.J Clin Epidemiol1996;49:10259.
  • 33
    Pedersen M, Klarlund M, Jacobsen S, Svendsen A, Frisch M.Validity of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry.Eur J Epidemiol2004;19:1097103.
  • 34
    Harrold LR, Saag KG, Yood RA, Mikuls TR, Andrade SE, Fouayzi H, et al.Validity of gout diagnoses in administrative data.Arthritis Rheum2007;57:1038.
  • 35
    Icen M, Crowson CS, McEvoy MT, Gabriel SE, Maradit Kremers H.Potential misclassification of patients with psoriasis in electronic databases.J Am Acad Dermatol2008;59:9815.
  • 36
    Malik A, Dinnella JE, Kwoh CK, Schumacher HR.Poor validation of medical record ICD-9 diagnoses of gout in a Veterans Affairs database.J Rheumatol2009;36:12836.
  • 37
    Chibnik LB, Massarotti EM, Costenbader KH.Identification and validation of lupus nephritis cases using administrative data.Lupus2010;19:7413.
  • 38
    Kim SY, Servi A, Polinski JM, Mogun H, Weinblatt ME, Katz JN, et al.Validation of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in health care utilization data.Arthritis Res Ther2011;13:R32.
  • 39
    Pepe M. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction.Oxford University Press;2003.
  • 40
    Worster A, Haines T.Medical record review studies: an overview.Israel J Trauma Intensive Care Emerg Med2002;2:1823.
  • 41
    Gariepy G, Rossignol M, Lippman A.Characteristics of subjects self-reporting arthritis in a population health survey: distinguishing between types of arthritis.Can J Public Health2009;100:46771.
  • 42
    Kehoe R, Wu SY, Leske MC, Chylack LT Jr.Comparing self-reported and physician-reported medical history.Am J Epidemiol1994;139:8138.
  • 43
    Chen G, Faris P, Hemmelgarn B, Walker R, Quan H.Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa.BMC Med Res Methodol2009;9:5.
  • 44
    Chubak J, Pocobelli G, Weiss NS.Tradeoffs between accuracy measures for electronic health care data algorithms.J Clin Epidemiol2012;65:3439.e2.
  • 45
    Carnahan R.Mini-Sentinel's systematic reviews of validated methods for identifying health outcomes using administrative data: summary of findings and suggestions for future research.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2012;21:909.
  • 46
    Stiles P, Boothroyd R, Robst J, Ray J.Ethically using administrative data in research: Medicaid administrators current practices and best practices recommendations.Adm Soc2011;43:17192.
  • 47
    Stiles P, Boothroyd R. Ethical use of administrative data for research purposes.2012.