Full Paper
Engineering of Push-Pull Thiophene Dyes to Enhance Light Absorption and Modulate Charge Recombination in Mesoscopic Solar Cells
Article first published online: 1 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202562
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cai, N., Wang, Y., Xu, M., Fan, Y., Li, R., Zhang, M. and Wang, P. (2013), Engineering of Push-Pull Thiophene Dyes to Enhance Light Absorption and Modulate Charge Recombination in Mesoscopic Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater., 23: 1846–1854. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201202562
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 APR 2013
- Article first published online: 1 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Received: 6 SEP 2012
Keywords:
- dye-sensitized solar cells;
- push-pull dye;
- thiophene;
- electron transfer;
- microstructures
Abstract
The elaborate selection of diverse π-conjugated segments which bridge the electron donors and acceptors in organic push-pull dyes can not only tune the molecular energy-levels but also impact the interfacial energetics and kinetics of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). In this paper, a series of triphenylamine-cyanoacrylic acid photosensitizers is reported with TT, EDOT-BT, EDOT-CPDT, and CPDT-EDOT (herein TT, EDOT, BT, and CPDT denote terthiophene, ethylenedioxythiophene, bithiophene, and cyclopentadithiophene, respectively) as the π-linkers, and the dye-structure correlated photocurrent and photovoltage features of DSCs based on a cobalt electrolyte are scrutinized via analyzing light absorption and multichannel charge transfer kinetics. Both stepwise incorporation of more electron-rich blocks and rational modulation of connection order of dissimilar segments can result in a negative movement of ground-state redox potential and a red-shift of the absorption peak. While these styles of reducing energy-gap do not exert too much influence on the electron injection from photoexcited dye molecules to titania, the dyestuff employing the EDOT-BT linker presents a faster interfacial charge recombination and a slower dye regeneration, accounting for its inferior cell efficiency of 5.3% compared to that of 9.4% at the AM1.5G conditions achieved by the CPDT-EDOT dye.

1616-3028/asset/2126_centre.gif?v=1&s=c88ccad5117044f38366989c886e57ea3f100c56)
