• Abidoye, B.O., Bulut, H., Lawrence, J.D., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A.M. (2011). US consumers’ valuation of quality attributes in beef products. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 43(01), 112.
  • Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 6475.
  • Alfnes, F. (2004). Stated Preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: Application of a mixed logit model. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 1937.
  • Baker, G.A. (2003). Food safety and fear: Factors affecting consumer response to food safety risk. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6(1), 111.
  • Becker, T. (2000). Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: A framework for analysis. British Food Journal, 102(3), 158176.
  • Carson, R.T., & Czajkowski, M. (2012). The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation. Working Paper.
  • Champ, P.A., Moore, R., & Bishop, R.C. (2009). A comparison of approaches to mitigate hypothetical bias. Agricultural & Resource Economics Review, 38(2), 166180.
  • Davidson, A., Schröder, M.J.A., & Bower, J.A. (2003). The importance of origin as a quality attribute for beef: Results from a Scottish consumer survey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2), 9198.
  • Dillman, D.A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Dosman, D.M., Adamowicz, W.L., & Hrudey, S.E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health and food safety related risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 21(2), 307318.
  • Greene, W.H., & Hensher, D.A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681698.
  • Greene, W.H., & Hensher, D.A. (2007). Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(5), 610623.
  • Grunert, K.G. (2005). Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 369391.
  • Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., & Greene, W.H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hoffmann, R. (2000). Country of origin–a consumer perception perspective of fresh meat. British Food Journal, 102(3), 211229.
  • Hu, W., Veeman, M., & Adamowicz, W. (2005). Labelling genetically modified food: Heterogeneous consumer preferences and the value of information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(1), 83102.
  • Jurenas, R., & Greene, J.L. (2012). Country-of-origin labeling for foods and the WTO trade dispute on meat labeling. Congressional Research Service.
  • Krinsky, I., & Robb, A.L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715719.
  • Krosnick, J.A., Allyson, L.H., Berent, M.K., Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M., Kopp, R.J., et al. (2002). The impact of “no opinion” response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 371403.
  • Kuhfeld, W.F. (2010). Marketing research methods in SAS experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques. Cory, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  • Lim, K.H., Hu, W., Maynard, L.J., & Goddard, E. (2013). U.S. consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for country-of-origin-labeled beef steak and food safety enhancements. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 93118.
  • List, J.A., Sinha, P., & Taylor, M.H. (2006). Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services: Evidence from field experiments. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(2), 137.
  • Loomis, J. (2011). What's to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies? Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 363370.
  • Loureiro, M.L., & Umberger, W.J. (2007). A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy, 32(4), 496514.
  • Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., & Swait, J.D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lusk, J., Brown, J., Mark, T., Proseku, I., Thompson, R., & Welsh, J. (2006). Consumer behavior, public policy, and country-of-origin labeling. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 28(2), 284292.
  • Lusk, J., & Coble, K.H. (2005). Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 393405.
    Direct Link:
  • Lusk, J., & Schroeder, T.C. (2004). Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 467482.
    Direct Link:
  • Marette, S., Clemens, R., & Babcock, B. (2008). Recent international and regulatory decisions about geographical indications. Agribusiness, 24(4), 453472.
  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics, 8, 105142.
  • Meijer, E., & Rouwendal, J. (2006). Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(2), 227244.
  • Mutondo, J.E., & Henneberry, S.R. (2007). A source-differentiated analysis of U.S. meat demand. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 32(03), 515533.
  • Northen, J.R. (2000). Quality attributes and quality cues effective communication in the UK meat supply chain. British Food Journal, 102(3), 230245.
  • Olsen, S.B. (2009). Choosing between internet and mail survey modes for choice experiment surveys considering non-market goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(4), 591610.
  • Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Research Publishers, LLC.
  • Pennings, J.M.E., Wansink, B., & Meulenberg, M.T.G. (2002). A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1), 91100.
  • Ready, R.C., Champ, P.A., & Lawton, J.L. (2010). Using respondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experiment. Land Economics, 86(2), 363381.
  • Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., & Marangon, F. (2008). Using flexible taste distributions to value collective reputation for environmentally friendly production methods. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 56(2), 145162.
  • Schroeder, T.C., Tonsor, G.T., Pennings, J.M.E., & Mintert, J. (2007). Consumer food safety risk perceptions and attitudes: Impacts on beef consumption across countries. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1), 127.
  • Schupp, A., & Gillespie, J. (2001). Consumer attitudes toward potential country-of-origin labeling of fresh or frozen beef. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 32(03), 3444.
  • Tonsor, G., Schroeder, T., Pennings, J., & Mintert, J. (2009a). Consumer Valuation of beef steak food safety and quality assurances in Canada, Japan, Mexico, and the United States. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 395416.
  • Tonsor, G.T., Schroeder, T.C., & Pennings, J.M. (2009b). Factors impacting food safety risk perceptions. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3), 625644.
  • Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge Univ Press.
  • Train, K., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space (pp. 116). Springer Netherlands.
  • Zepeda, L., Douthitt, R., & You, S.Y. (2003). Consumer risk perceptions toward agricultural biotechnology, self protection, and food demand: the case of milk in the United States. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 973984.