Environmental and Energy Engineering
Alternative concept for SOFC with direct internal reforming operation: Benefits from inserting catalyst rod
Article first published online: 20 OCT 2009
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12091
Copyright © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Dokamaingam, P., Laosiripojana, N., Soottitantawat, A. and Assabumrungrat, S. (2010), Alternative concept for SOFC with direct internal reforming operation: Benefits from inserting catalyst rod. AIChE Journal, 56: 1639–1650. doi: 10.1002/aic.12091
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 20 OCT 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 1 SEP 2009
- Manuscript Received: 25 MAR 2009
Funded by
- Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and Commission on Higher Education
- Thailand Graduate Institute of Science and Technology (TGIST) program
- Thailand's National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). Grant Number: TG-55-20-50-058D
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- direct internal reforming;
- solid oxide fuel cell;
- catalyst
Abstract
Mathematical models of direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell (DIR-SOFC) fueled by methane are developed using COMSOL® software. The benefits of inserting Ni-catalyst rod in the middle of tubular-SOFC are simulated and compared to conventional DIR-SOFC. It reveals that DIR-SOFC with inserted catalyst provides smoother temperature gradient along the system and gains higher power density and electrochemical efficiency with less carbon deposition. Sensitivity analyses are performed. By increasing inlet fuel flow rate, the temperature gradient and power density improve, but less electrical efficiency with higher carbon deposition is predicted. The feed with low inlet steam/carbon ratio enhances good system performances but also results in high potential for carbon formation; this gains great benefit of DIR-SOFC with inserted catalyst because the rate of carbon deposition is remarkably low. Compared between counter- and co-flow patterns, the latter provides smoother temperature distribution with higher efficiency; thus, it is the better option for practical applications. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010

1547-5905/asset/AIC_left.gif?v=1&s=43a3d567c64d3d5d712c0af6c2cacb1e1bcc1a2b)
1547-5905/asset/AIC_right.gif?v=1&s=518efadeedca9ceeef271499f690fdebd2ed9164)
