Environmental and Energy Engineering
Model-based optimization of hydrogen generation by methane steam reforming in autothermal packed-bed membrane reformer
Article first published online: 31 MAR 2010
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12265
Copyright © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Simakov, D. S. A. and Sheintuch, M. (2011), Model-based optimization of hydrogen generation by methane steam reforming in autothermal packed-bed membrane reformer. AIChE J., 57: 525–541. doi: 10.1002/aic.12265
Publication History
- Issue published online: 31 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 31 MAR 2010
- Accepted manuscript online: 31 MAR 2010 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Revised: 17 MAR 2010
- Manuscript Received: 7 NOV 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- hydrogen;
- methane steam reforming;
- membrane reactor;
- autothermal reformer;
- optimization;
- fuel cells
Abstract
An autothermal membrane reformer comprising two separated compartments, a methane oxidation catalytic bed and a methane steam reforming bed, which hosts hydrogen separation membranes, is optimized for hydrogen production by steam reforming of methane to power a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack. Capitalizing on recent experimental demonstrations of hydrogen production in such a reactor, we develop here an appropriate model, validate it with experimental data and then use it for the hydrogen generation optimization in terms of the reformer efficiency and power output. The optimized reformer, with adequate hydrogen separation area, optimized exothermic-to-endothermic feed ratio and reduced heat losses, is shown to be capable to fuel kW-range PEMFC stacks, with a methane-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of up to 0.8. This is expected to provide an overall methane-to-electric power efficiency of a combined reformer-fuel cell unit of ∼0.5. Recycling of steam reforming effluent to the oxidation bed for combustion of unreacted and unseparated compounds is expected to provide an additional efficiency gain. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2011

1547-5905/asset/AIC_left.gif?v=1&s=43a3d567c64d3d5d712c0af6c2cacb1e1bcc1a2b)
1547-5905/asset/AIC_right.gif?v=1&s=518efadeedca9ceeef271499f690fdebd2ed9164)
