Process Systems Engineering
Probability bounds analysis for nonlinear dynamic process models
Article first published online: 12 APR 2010
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12278
Copyright © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Enszer, J. A., Lin, Y., Ferson, S., Corliss, G. F. and Stadtherr, M. A. (2011), Probability bounds analysis for nonlinear dynamic process models. AIChE J., 57: 404–422. doi: 10.1002/aic.12278
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 12 APR 2010
- Accepted manuscript online: 12 APR 2010 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Revised: 1 APR 2010
- Manuscript Received: 11 DEC 2009
Funded by
- U. S. Department of Energy. Grant Number: DE-FG36-08GO88020-A0
- Lilly Foundation graduate fellowship (JAE)
- University of Notre Dame Center for Research Computing
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- design (process simulation);
- mathematical modeling;
- numerical solutions;
- reactor analysis;
- bioprocess engineering
Abstract
Dynamic process models frequently involve uncertain parameters and inputs. Propagating these uncertainties rigorously through a mathematical model to determine their effect on system states and outputs is a challenging problem. In this work, we describe a new approach, based on the use of Taylor model methods, for the rigorous propagation of uncertainties through nonlinear systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We concentrate on uncertainties whose distribution is not known precisely, but can be bounded by a probability box (p-box), and show how to use p-boxes in the context of Taylor models. This allows us to obtain p-box representations of the uncertainties in the state variable outputs of a nonlinear ODE model. Examples having two to three uncertain parameters or initial states and focused on reaction process dynamics are used to demonstrate the potential of this approach. Using this method, rigorous probability bounds can be determined at a computational cost that is significantly less than that required by Monte Carlo analysis. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2011

1547-5905/asset/AIC_left.gif?v=1&s=43a3d567c64d3d5d712c0af6c2cacb1e1bcc1a2b)
1547-5905/asset/AIC_right.gif?v=1&s=518efadeedca9ceeef271499f690fdebd2ed9164)
