Process Systems Engineering
Optimization and Control of Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Under Uncertainty
Article first published online: 21 MAR 2012
DOI: 10.1002/aic.13783
Copyright © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Khajuria, H. and Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2013), Optimization and Control of Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes Under Uncertainty. AIChE J., 59: 120–131. doi: 10.1002/aic.13783
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 21 MAR 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 22 FEB 2012 01:35PM EST
- Manuscript Revised: 1 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Received: 14 SEP 2011
Funded by
- Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851, ParOS Ltd.
- EU project HY2SEPS. Grant Number: 019887
- EPSRC. Grant Numbers: EP/G059071/1, EP/I014640/1
- KAUST
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- pressure swing adsorption;
- modeling;
- dynamic optimization;
- simultaneous design and control;
- explicit model-based predictive controller
The real-time periodic performance of a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system strongly depends on the choice of key decision variables and operational considerations such as processing steps and column pressure temporal profiles, making its design and operation a challenging task. This work presents a detailed optimization-based approach for simultaneously incorporating PSA design, operational, and control aspects under the effect of time variant and invariant disturbances. It is applied to a two-bed, six-step PSA system represented by a rigorous mathematical model, where the key optimization objective is to maximize the expected H2 recovery while achieving a closed loop product H2 purity of 99.99%, for separating 70% H2, 30% CH4 feed. The benefits over sequential design and control approach are shown in terms of closed-loop recovery improvement of more than 3%, while the incorporation of explicit/multiparametric model predictive controllers improves the closed loop performance. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 120–131, 2013

1547-5905/asset/AIC_left.gif?v=1&s=43a3d567c64d3d5d712c0af6c2cacb1e1bcc1a2b)
1547-5905/asset/AIC_right.gif?v=1&s=518efadeedca9ceeef271499f690fdebd2ed9164)
