SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Disease Overview and Clinical Presentation
  4. Diagnosis
  5. References

Disease overview: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. FL is characterized by diffuse lymphoadenopathy, involvement of bone marrow, splenomegaly, and less commonly other extranodal sites of involvement. In general, cytopenias can occur but constitutional symptoms of fever, nightsweats, and weight loss are uncommon.

Diagnosis: Diagnosis is based on histology of preferably a biopsy of a lymph node. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10, and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl-2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl-2 genes.

Risk stratification: The FL International Prognostic Index prognostic model for FL uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age > 60 years, hemoglobin < 12 g/dL, serum lactate dehydrogenase > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas > 4. The presence of 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high-risk disease with median 10-year survivals in the pre-rituximab era of ∼71, 51, and 36 months, respectively. With the use of more modern therapies, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, the outcome has improved.

Risk-adapted therapy: Observation continues to be adequate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemotherapy plus rituximab, which has improved response rates, duration of response, and overall survival. Randomized studies have shown additional benefit for maintenance rituximab both following chemotherapy-rituximab and single-agent rituximab. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not shown a survival benefit in first remission patients. SCT including both autologous and allogeneic SCT or experimental agent therapy is considered for recurrent disease. Am. J. Hematol. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Disease Overview and Clinical Presentation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Disease Overview and Clinical Presentation
  4. Diagnosis
  5. References

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common lymphoma diagnosed in the United States and western Europe, ∼20% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) and 70% of indolent lymphomas [1]. The median age at diagnosis of 60 years, and a slight female predominance [2, 3]. The incidence is slightly increased among relatives of persons with FL [4].

FLs are malignant counterparts of normal germinal center (GC) B cells [5]. Approximately 85% of patients with FL have t(14;18) which results in the overexpression of the BCL-2 protein, a member of a family of proteins that blocks apoptosis. However, it is likely that multiple genetic events are required for the development of FL because the t(14;18) translocation can be identified in the B cells from normal individuals and patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Patients with FL generally present with asymptomatic lymphadenopathy, with waxing and waning present for years. Involvement of bone marrow is present in 70% of patients, whereas involvement of other normal organs is uncommon. Less than 20% of patients present with B symptoms and <20% of patients present with an increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Involvement of the intestine is a unique site of presentation of this disease, usually early stage, and with a favorable prognosis [6].

Diagnosis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Disease Overview and Clinical Presentation
  4. Diagnosis
  5. References

FL recapitulates normal GC of secondary lymphoid follicles [5]. The neoplastic cells consist of a mixture of centrocytes (small- to medium-sized cells) and centroblast (large cells). The clinical aggressiveness of the tumor increases with increasing numbers of centroblasts. The World Health Organization (WHO) Classification [5] has adopted grading from 1 to 3 based on increased numbers of centroblasts counted per high power field (hpf): Grade I with 0–5 centroblasts/hpf (follicular small cleaved), Grade II with 6–15 centroblasts/hpf (follicular mixed) Grade III with more than 15 centroblasts/hpf (follicular large cell). Grade III has been subdivided into grade IIIa, in which centrocytes are present, and grade IIIb, in which there are sheets of centroblasts [7].

Involvement of bone marrow is very common with paratrabecular lymphoid aggregates [5]. FL cells express monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain, CD19, CD20, CD10, and BCL-6 and are negative for CD5 and CD23. In virtually all cases, FL cells overexpress BCL-2, due to t(14;18). Clonal Ig gene rearrangements are also present, and most cases have extensive somatic mutations.

Histologic transformation of FL from an indolent disease to a DLBCL occurs in 10–70% of patients over time, with a risk of 3% per year, and is associated with rapid progression of lymphadenopathy, extranodal disease (besides the marrow), B symptoms, and elevated serum LDH [8, 9].

Prognosis

The two best measures of outcome are the FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) and tumor grade [10]. There is also evidence that the characteristics of the associated cells in the tumor microenvironment of FL influences disease behavior and prognosis [11–13].

The FLIPI includes five prognostic factors patient age, stage, number of involved nodal areas, serum LDH, and hemoglobin [14]. The FLIPI was developed out of an international study of survival data in 4,167 patients with FL diagnosed between 1985 and 1992. This is shown in Table I. A modified version, of this score, the FLIPI2, evaluates five parameters, with some overlap of the FLIPI [15]. Presently, the current utility of the FLIPI2 model remains uncertain. As the incorporation of rituximab into the mainsteam therapy of FL, the FLIPI has continued to be a useful prognostic model [16].

Table I. Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index [14]
Risk group# Risk factors5-Year OS (%)10-Year OS (%)
Low risk0–19171
Intermediate risk27851
High risk≥35236

FL tumors are graded from 1 to 3, and this grade has some prognostic utility. There has generally been suboptimal consensus of pathologists on grading FL. There is no evidence to support a different treatment approach between grade I and grade II FL. Differences in molecular genetics as well as clinical behavior suggest that FL grade IIIa is an indolent disease whereas IIIb is an aggressive disease [5, 17].

FL grade III has been historically referred to as follicular large-cell lymphoma. As many studies likely include both grade IIIa and IIIb, this heterogeneity may affect interpretation of the outcomes. Although the follicular architecture is intact, the clinical presentation, behavior, and outcome with treatment in many patients with FL grade IIIb more closely approximates that of DLBCL [18–20]. In contrast to DLBCL, the relapse rate of FL grade IIIb is in some series is higher, but survival is longer [21]. A recent series suggested similar outcome of grade IIIa and IIIb cases and no benefit for the inclusion of anthracyclines in the treatment regimen [22].

Investigation of the cellular microenvironment of FL has provided interesting insights into prognosis [11, 13, 23–30]. It has been suggested that FL is an immunologically functional disease in which an interaction between the tumor cells and the microenvironment determines overall clinical behavior. These studies that have observed an impact on prognosis of the normal infiltrate of macrophages, T cells, and T-cell subsets will need an additional study in larger datasets, and prospectively with uniformly treated patient populations.

Treatment

Early stage.

Less than 10% of patients with FL have stage I/II disease [31]. Radiation therapy (RT) is the treatment of choice for limited stage FL and results in 10-year overall survival rates of 60–80%; with a median survival is ∼19 years [32]. A dose of 24 Gy appears to be highly effective, with no benefit of higher doses [33]. However, most patients with stage I disease treated in the United States do not receive RT [31]. Adjuvant chemotherapy probably does not add additional benefit after local radiotherapy [34]. If significant morbidity is possible from radiotherapy based on the location of the disease area or if the patient chooses to not receive radiation, observation may be a reasonable alternative, especially for stage II patients [35].

In a large study of over 6000 patients with stage I or stage II, FL diagnosed from 1973 to 2004, 34% of whom were initially treated with RT [10], patients who received initial RT had higher rates of disease-specific survival at 5 (90% vs. 81%), 10 (79% vs. 66%), 15 (68% vs. 57%), and 20 (63% vs. 51%) years [36]. Selected early stage patients can be observed without initial treatment with radiation. In one report, the median overall survival of selected untreated patients was 19 years. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 63% of patients had not required treatment [35].

Advanced stage.

The overwhelming majority of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. Patients with asymptomatic FL do not require immediate treatment unless they have symptomatic nodal disease, compromised end organ function B symptoms, symptomatic extranodal disease, or cytopenias. This approach is supported by randomized prospective trials of observation versus immediate treatment. One of the largest trials compared immediate treatment with chlorambucil to observation [37]. At a median follow-up of 16 years, no difference in overall survival and cause-specific survival was seen between the two approaches. Similar results have been noted in other prospective trials of initial treatment versus observation [38].

A major question is whether rituximab might change this approach in early treatment in asymptomatic patients. A study compared observation to rituximab alone or rituximab followed by maintenance in previously untreated FL. The median time to next treatment was 34 months in the watch and wait patient but was not reached in the rituixmab treatment arm. The 3-year progression free survival (PFS) was 33, 80, and 90% of the observed, rituximab, or R+ maintenance patients, with 95% overall survival (OS) in all three groups. The important issues of time to second therapy, quality of life, impact on histologic transformation, cost, toxicity, and future responses to rituximab are not yet addressed [39].

Rituxmab has changed the paradigm of treating FL. The recent improvement in survival is largely due to the use of anti-CD20 antibody-based therapy [40]. The benefit of adding rituximab to combination chemotherapy for the initial treatment has been demonstrated in multiple randomized trials of chemotherapy with or without rituximab [41–45] (Table II). All of these trials have demonstrated improved response rates time to progression (TTP) in the rituximab plus chemotherapy arms, as well as improvement in overall survival.

Table II. Phase III Trials of Chemotherapy versus Rituximab + Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients with Follicular NHL
StudyRegimensOS outcome
Marcus [44]CVP vs. CVP-RImproved OS
Hiddemann [42]CHOP vs. CHOP-RImproved OS
Herold [41]MCP vs. MCP-RImproved OS
Salles [45]CHVP vs. CHVP-R (+ interferon)Improved OS in high 3-5 FLIPI

Other chemotherapy drugs plus rituximab have also been reported. Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) has been compared to CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) in a randomized phase III trial with bendamustine (90 mg/m2 Days 1 and 2) plus rituximab (375 mg/m2 Day 1) in 513 patients with advanced follicular, indolent, and mantle cell lymphoma [46]. In updated results, superior median progression-free survival (69.5 vs. 31.2 months) at 45 months, with less toxicity, including lower rates of grade III and IV neutropenia and leukopenia was observed. There was no difference in overall survival at a median follow-up of 45 months. Intensifying the schedule of CHOP-R from every 21 to every 14 days was also of no benefit [47]. Fludarabine plus rituximab [48] and fludarabine, mintoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab [49] both showed response rates in excess of 90% in previously untreated patients but significant neutropenia, opportunistic infections have been observed.

Rituximab alone has been used as the first therapy in patients with indolent lymphoma, with overall response rates of around 70% and complete response (CR) rates of over 30% reported [50–53]. The most impressive data of single-agent rituximab is the recent update of the SAKK trial [54]. Patients received four weekly doses, and then patients with stable disease or better were randomized to observation or four doses of maintenance with one dose every 2 months. A recent update of this study was reported in 2010. In this study, 202 patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory FL administered four weekly doses of single-agent rituximab has been reported. The 151 patients with responding or stable disease at Week 12 were randomized to no further treatment or prolonged rituximab maintenance every 2 months for four doses. At a median follow-up of 35 months, patients who received the prolonged rituximab maintenance had a twofold increase in event-free-survival (23 versus 12 months). Now with longer follow-up, 35% of responders remain in remission at 8 years with 45% of newly diagnosed patients, in this study, in remission at 8 years with the additional maintenance rituximab.

Maintenance rituximab has been shown to benefit patients who did not receive chemotherapy and rituximab as part of initial treatment. A randomized trial of maintenance rituximab versus observation after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) with the majority having FL, reported that patients who received maintenance rituximab had improved rates of 3-year progression-free survival (68 vs. 33%). Survival rates were similar between the two groups [55]. With the current paradigm of treating patients with chemotherapy plus rituximab, this study has less applicability.

The use of maintenance rituximab after chemoimmunotherapy in patients with FL has been examined in a large randomized trial [56]. While maintenance rituximab appears to improve progression-free survival rates, toxicities, albeit tolerable, are increased and the effect on overall survival is to date unclear. The primary rituximab and maintenance phase III intergroup trial in 1018 patients with previously untreated FL responded to chemoimmunotherapy [CVP-R, CHOP-R, or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (FCM)-R] randomly assigned maintenance with rituximab (375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks for 24 months) or placebo [56]. At a median follow-up of 36 months from randomization, patients assigned to rituximab maintenance had higher rates of progression-free survival (75% vs. 58%), and a higher percentage of patients in complete response/complete response unconfirmed (CRu) at 24 months (72% vs. 52%), 2 years post-randomization. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients with grade III/IV adverse events and infections in the rituximab maintenance group. At this time, overall survival is the same in both groups.

Radioimmunotherapy alone has been used as the initial treatment in a limited number of patients with FL. 131I tositumomab was given to 76 previously untreated patients with FL. The overall and complete response rates of 95 and 75%, respectively, and at 5 years, the OS and PFS was 89 and 59%, respectively [57].

Radioimmunotherapy has also been applied as consolidation following conventional chemotherapy induction in patients with FL. Both 90Yi-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab have been studied. This approach has been associated with very high response rates, conversions of partial response (PR) to CR, and well-maintained responses [58–62]. Probably, the most significant study is a phase III trial comparing 90Yi-ibritumomab tiuxetan to observation, following a CR or PR to induction chemotherapy for treatment naïve patients with FL [63]. Of note, the majority of patients did not receive rituximab along with the induction chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, both the PR and CR patients who received Yi90-ibritumomab tiuxetan had significantly longer median progression-free survival with improvement of about 24 months. In contrast to this study, a randomized trial of CHOP plus rituximab to CHOP followed by 131I tositumomab did not see any differences in PFS between the two arms [64].

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used to consolidate first remission for patients with FL. These studies generally preceded the widespread use of rituximab. Generally, about 50% of patients are disease free at 10 or more years following ASCT, but the risk of second malignancies both myelodysplasia (MDS), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and solid tumors has been observed with long follow-up of these patients. Several randomized trials have examined the role of ASCT in previously untreated patients with FL following an induction therapy [65–69]. The majority of these studies have demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS, but no impact on overall survival [70]. One reason for the lack of impact on overall survival has been the excess number of second malignancies. The findings in these studies are summarized in Table III.

Table III. Phase III Trials of AutoSCT in Previously Untreated Patients with Follicular NHL
StudyRegimensOutcomes
GLSG [66]CHOP + ASCT (TBI) vs. CHOP + INF-αImproved PFS, not OS
GOELAMS [65]VCAP + ASCT (TBI) vs. CHVP + INF- αImproved EFS (FLIPI > 2), not OS
GELA [67]CHOP + ASCT (TBI) vs. CHVP + INF- αNo different EFS/OS
GITMO [68]CHOP-R vs. R-high-dose sequential therapyImproved PFS, not OS

Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (hematopoietic cell transplantation, HCT) can potentially lead to cure for patients with FL, due to the significant treatment-related mortality, this is largely reserved for patients with relapsed and more refractory disease.

Part of the natural history of indolent NHL is progression to a higher grade histologic subtype, such as DLBCL [8, 9]. A subgroup of patients with indolent NHL who transform to a more aggressive histology may attain complete remission following treatment with CHOP-like chemotherapy and some may be cured by high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous HCT.

Treatment of relapsed FL

When patients with relapsed FL require treatment, there are many options, ranging from rituximab alone to combination chemotherapy plus rituximab, radioimmunotherapy and for selected patients SCT.

A recent update of single-agent rituximab therapy in patients with relapsed FL is from the SAKK trial. In that study, patients with either newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory FL were treated with four weekly doses of rituximab [54]. Patients with either responding or stable disease at Week 12 were randomized to observation or maintenance with one dose every 2 months for four doses. With long follow-up, 35% of responders remain in remission at 8 years. However, in the context of current induction therapy that includes chemotherapy and rituximab in the majority of patients, it is uncertain if the response data to single-agent rituximab is as high or durable as in patients who did not receive rituximab plus chemotherapy induction. There is a evidence however that retreatment with rituximab in patients with relapsed, largely FL, who had previously responded to rituximab had a response rate of 40%, following retreatment, and the median TTP of 18 months [71].

The combination of chemotherapy and rituximab has enhanced the efficacy of treatment of relapsed FL. Probably, the largest study treated selected patients with relapsed FL who were previously not treated with an anthracycline or rituximab containing regimen [72, 73]. Patients were randomized to CHOP or CHOP-R and responding patients were randomized to 2 years of maintenance rituximab or observation. The overall and CR rates were significantly improved in the CHOP-R group, and the median PFS was improved by ∼12 months. A recent update of this study now with a median follow-up of 6 years reported that maintenance rituximab also improved median progression-free survival by 2.4 years. The overall survival at 5 years following maintenance was 74% versus 64% with observation alone.

Another regimen in which a benefit for the addition of rituximab was seen for relapsed disease in a randomized trial using FCM [74]. A number of phase II trials of other agents plus rituximab associated with quite high response rates included bendamustine plus rituximab with 90% response rate (RR) and median PFS of 2 years [75–77]. Single-agent bendamustine has an overall response rate of 77 with a median response duration of 6.7 months [75]. The regimen FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab) has a similarly high response rate but with significant myelosuppression [78]. Phase II studies using bortezomib and rituixmab and bortezomib, rituximab and bendamustine have reported RR of ∼50 and 93%, respectively [79, 80].

Two anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy agents (RIT) are Federal Drug Agency (FDA) approved for treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory FL [81]. The response rates in this patient population are similar with both agents, with 60–80% of patients responding. The median progression-free survival is about 12 months, although the ∼20–37% of patients who achieve a CR have a median TTP of ∼4 years [82, 83]. A randomized trial compared single agent rituximab to 90Yi-ibritumomab in patients with relapsed indolent (predominantly FL) [84]. The overall and complete response rates were significantly higher with RIT but no difference in TTP or OS was observed. Retreatment with these agents remains controversial with uncertainty of delivery of full dose and concerns of second malignancies [85].

FL is extremely responsive to RT; low-dose RT (e.g., total dose of 4 Gy) can be used for the palliation of patients who have symptoms related to a single disease site [86, 87].

The use of either autologous or allogeneic HCT in FL is controversial and the subject of numerous clinical trials. A large number of phase II studies before the availability of rituximab, involving high-dose therapy and ASCT have shown that for ∼40% of patients with good performance status and chemosensitive relapsed disease may experience prolong progression-free and overall survival rates [88–92]. Before the widespread use of rituixmab for in vivo purging many strategies were taken to render the autologous stem cell collections free of lymphoma cells. Although single institution studies suggested that reinfusion of tumor free stem cells led to a decreased relapse rate, it remains controversial as to whether there is a benefit particularly now in the rituximab era. The only phase III randomized trial (the CUP trial) comparing ASCT to conventional chemotherapy in relapsed FL patients demonstrated a higher PFS and OS for ASCT, and no benefit for purging the stem cell graft [93]. An retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ASCT following rituximab-based salvage therapy did not suggest a benefit of ASCT when compared with conventional therapy. Unfortunately as has been seen in ASCT in first remission, second malignancies both solid tumors and MDS/AML are reported post ASCT.

Phase II studies have looked at the use of in vivo purging pre-ASCT and maintenance therapy with rituximab following ASCT in patients with relapsed FL. These suggest an improvement in PFS, similar to what has been seen following conventional chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy. A recent phase III trial in patients with relapsed FL has investigated the inclusion of rituximab for in vivo purging pre-ASCT and 2 years of maintenance post-ASCT [94]. An interim analysis demonstrated improvement in PFS for patients receiving rituximab for in vivo purging, maintenance and the combination of both when compared with no rituximab.

Allogeneic transplantation has been investigated in patients with relapsed FL. Both myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches have been used. Unfortunately, myeloablative conditioning has a treatment-related mortality of up to 40%; however, the relapse rate is <20% [95]. Enthusiasm for RIC allogeneic has lower treatment-related mortality [96–99], but some reports suggest that the relapse rate may be higher than conventional myeloablative conditioning. The role of allogeneic transplantation for FL remains uncertain, but certainly for younger patients with more resistant disease, it remains a potentially curative option for relapsed FL.

Newer agents

There are a multitude of new approaches that are being studies in patients with FL. This includes monoclonal antibodies, idiotype vaccines, immunomodulatory agents and novel drugs such as kinase inhibitors.

Monoclonal antibodies directed against other B-cell-associated antigens as well as new anti-CD20 mAbs are being investigated in FL. The anti-CD80 mAb galiximab has an overall RR of 66% and complete response rate 19%, in patients with relapsed FL [100]. A phase III trial that was then converted to a phase II trial reported that that the median PFS was 12.0 months for R+G and 9.0 months for R+P. Overall response rate was 51% for R+G versus 48% for R+P (P = 0.455) and complete response was 20% for R+G and 15% for R+P (P = 0.251) [101]. The notion of putting more than one antibody together has also been explored with epratuzumab a humanized anti-CD22 mAb [102]. The antibody alone has single-agent activity and when combined with rituximab has RR of 54 in rituximab naïve patients and 64% in patients who have had prior rituximab. In treatment naïve patients, the combination of rituximab and epratuzumab had an ORR of 84% [103]. The anti-CD40 mAb HCD122 has a ORR of 27% in relapsed FL patients [104]. This antibody blocks the CD40–CD40 ligand signal from T cells and antibody dependent cell mediates cytotoxicity (ADCC). Several new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are being evaluated in patients with FL who are refractory to rituximab. These include several humanized antibodies which are designed to have less infusion toxicity and better ADCC effector function [105–107]. The other mAb that has been of interest is GA101, the first type II, glycoengineered and humanized monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody [108]. In rituximab refractory patients in the high-dose cohort, the RR was 50% with median PFS or 11 months. Further studies are ongoing to better define activity of these agents in combination with chemotherapy, to better define the utility of these mAbs.

A number of immunostimulatory agents have been studied to enhance the activity of rituximab. These include cytokines, such as IL-2, and immunostimulatory DNA sequences known as CpGs [109–111]. To date, although having immunomodulatory effects, the impact on enhancing the therapeutic effect of rituximab has been limited. A phase II study of lenilidomide plus rituximab has reported high response rates, but phase III study will be needed to demonstrate superiority over rituximab alone [112].

The other area of interest has been in active immunization, focusing largely on the idiotype protein as the antigen. To date, there have been three randomized studies using idiotype proteins coupled to KLH following the induction of remission in patients with follicular NHL. The Favrille trial used rituximab for induction therapy. The median TTP was 9 months for the Idiotype-KLH-vaccinated patients and 12.6 months in the control group (P = 0.019) [113]. However, this difference was attributed to more patients with high-risk FLIPI scores in the Id-KLH arm. The Biovax study reported showing a 14 month improvement in PFS for the Id-KLH-vaccinated patients when compared with control; however, the induction chemotherapy was intense and remissions had to be sustained for 12 months before initiation of vaccination [114]. The final trial using the MyVax Id-KLH conjugate awaits final reporting. Based on these studies, it is unlikely now, that idiotype vaccination will be pursued in follicular NHL.

B-cell kinases are logical targets for therapy in FL. To date, three kinase inhibitors, CAL101, PCI-32765, and R788 that target PI3 kinase p110δ, btk, and syk, respectively. In relapsed and refractory FL patients, the response rates to CAL101 [115], PCI-32765 [116], and R788 [117] were 62% (including other indolent NHLs besides FL, 27, and 10%, respectively. These agents are undergoing additional study, in combination with chemotherapy and as consolidation following remission induction to better define their role. They represent novel approaches to lymphoma therapy, and are perhaps some of the more exciting agents currently being studied.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Disease Overview and Clinical Presentation
  4. Diagnosis
  5. References
  • 1
    A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood 1997; 89: 39093918.
  • 2
    Armitage JO,Weisenburger DD. New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 27802795.
  • 3
    Harris NL,Jaffe ES,Diebold J, et al. World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 38353849.
  • 4
    Biagi JJ,Seymour JF. Insights into the molecular pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma arising from analysis of geographic variation. Blood 2002; 99: 42654275.
  • 5
    WHO Classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. IARC 2008.
  • 6
    Schmatz AI,Streubel B,Kretschmer-Chott E, et al. Primary follicular lymphoma of the duodenum is a distinct mucosal/submucosal variant of follicular lymphoma: A retrospective study of 63 cases. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 14451451.
  • 7
    Ott G,Katzenberger T,Lohr A, et al. Cytomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic profiles of follicular lymphoma: 2 types of follicular lymphoma grade 3. Blood 2002; 99: 38063812.
  • 8
    Freedman AS. Biology and management of histologic transformation of indolent lymphoma. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005; 314320.
  • 9
    Montoto S,Fitzgibbon J. Transformation of indolent B-cell lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 18271834.
  • 10
    Relander T,Johnson NA,Farinha P, et al. Prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 29022913.
  • 11
    Dave SS,Wright G,Tan B, et al. Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 21592169.
  • 12
    Glas AM,Kersten MJ,Delahaye LJ, et al. Gene expression profiling in follicular lymphoma to assess clinical aggressiveness and to guide the choice of treatment. Blood 2005; 105: 301317.
  • 13
    Carreras J,Lopez-Guillermo A,Fox BC, et al. High numbers of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells are associated with improved overall survival in follicular lymphoma. Blood 2006; 108: 29572964.
  • 14
    Solal-Celigny P,Roy P,Colombat P, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood 2004; 104: 12581265.
  • 15
    Federico M,Bellei M,Marcheselli L, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index 2: A new prognostic index for follicular lymphoma developed by the international follicular lymphoma prognostic factor project. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 45554562.
  • 16
    Buske C,Hoster E,Dreyling M, et al. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) separates high-risk from intermediate- or low-risk patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma treated front-line with rituximab and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) with respect to treatment outcome. Blood 2006; 108: 15041508.
  • 17
    Wahlin BE,Yri OE,Kimby E, et al. Clinical significance of the WHO grades of follicular lymphoma in a population-based cohort of 505 patients with long follow-up times. Br J Haematol 2011; 156: 225233.
  • 18
    Anderson JR,Vose JM,Bierman PJ, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of follicular large-cell lymphoma: A report from the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 218224.
  • 19
    Hans CP,Weisenburger DD,Vose JM, et al. A significant diffuse component predicts for inferior survival in grade 3 follicular lymphoma, but cytologic subtypes do not predict survival. Blood 2003; 101: 23632367.
  • 20
    Rodriguez J,McLaughlin P,Hagemeister FB, et al. Follicular large cell lymphoma: An aggressive lymphoma that often presents with favorable prognostic features. Blood 1999; 93: 22022207.
  • 21
    Chau I,Jones R,Cunningham D, et al. Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: Is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 3642.
  • 22
    Shustik J,Quinn M,Connors JM, et al. Follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma grades 3A and 3B have a similar outcome and appear incurable with anthracycline-based therapy. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 11641169.
  • 23
    Alvaro T,Lejeune M,Salvado MT, et al. Immunohistochemical patterns of reactive microenvironment are associated with clinicobiologic behavior in follicular lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 53505357.
  • 24
    Canioni D,Salles G,Mounier N, et al. High numbers of tumor-associated macrophages have an adverse prognostic value that can be circumvented by rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma enrolled onto the GELA-GOELAMS FL-2000 trial. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 440446.
  • 25
    Farinha P,Masoudi H,Skinnider BF, et al. Analysis of multiple biomarkers shows that lymphoma-associated macrophage (LAM) content is an independent predictor of survival in follicular lymphoma (FL). Blood 2005; 106: 21692174.
  • 26
    Glas AM,Knoops L,Delahaye L, et al. Gene-expression and immunohistochemical study of specific T-cell subsets and accessory cell types in the transformation and prognosis of follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 390398.
  • 27
    Klapper W,Hoster E,Rolver L, et al. Tumor sclerosis but not cell proliferation or malignancy grade is a prognostic marker in advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: The German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 33303336.
  • 28
    Kuppers R. Prognosis in follicular lymphoma—It's in the microenvironment. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 21522153.
  • 29
    Lee AM,Clear AJ,Calaminici M, et al. Number of CD4+ cells and location of forkhead box protein P3-positive cells in diagnostic follicular lymphoma tissue microarrays correlates with outcome. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 50525059.
  • 30
    Wahlin BE,Sander B,Christensson B, et al. CD8+ T-cell content in diagnostic lymph nodes measured by flow cytometry is a predictor of survival in follicular lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 388397.
  • 31
    Friedberg J,Huang J,Dillon H, et al. Initial therapeutic strategy in follicular lymphoma: An analysis from the National LymphoCare Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 428s.
  • 32
    Guadagnolo BA,Li S,Neuberg D, et al. Long-term outcome and mortality trends in early-stage, Grade 1–2 follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 928934.
  • 33
    Lowry L,Smith P,Qian W, et al. Reduced dose radiotherapy for local control in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A randomised phase III trial. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 8692.
  • 34
    Kelsey SM,Newland AC,Hudson GV, et al. A British National Lymphoma Investigation randomised trial of single agent chlorambucil plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in low grade, localised non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Med Oncol 1994; 11: 1925.
  • 35
    Advani R,Rosenberg SA,Horning SJ. Stage I and II follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Long-term follow-up of no initial therapy. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 14541459.
  • 36
    Pugh TJ,Ballonoff A,Newman F, et al. Improved survival in patients with early stage low-grade follicular lymphoma treated with radiation: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis. Cancer 2010; 116: 38433851.
  • 37
    Ardeshna KM,Smith P,Norton A, et al. Long-term effect of a watch and wait policy versus immediate systemic treatment for asymptomatic advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 516522.
  • 38
    Brice P,Bastion Y,Lepage E, et al. Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: A randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 11101117.
  • 39
    Ardeshna K,Smith P,Qian W, et al. An intergroup randomised trial of rituximab versus a watch and wait strategy in patients with stage II, III, IV, asymptomatic, non-bulky follicular lymphoma (Grades 1, 2 and 3a). A preliminary analysis. Blood 2010; 116:abstract 6.
  • 40
    Fisher RI,LeBlanc M,Press OW, et al. New treatment options have changed the survival of patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 84478452.
  • 41
    Herold M,Haas A,Srock S, et al. Rituximab added to first-line mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisolone chemotherapy followed by interferon maintenance prolongs survival in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: An East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 19861992.
  • 42
    Hiddemann W,Kneba M,Dreyling M, et al. Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: Results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 2005; 106: 37253732.
  • 43
    Marcus R,Imrie K,Belch A, et al. CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma. Blood 2005; 105: 14171423.
  • 44
    Marcus R,Imrie K,Solal-Celigny P, et al. Phase III Study of R-CVP compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone alone in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4579–4586.
  • 45
    Salles G,Mounier N,de Guibert S, et al. Rituximab combined with chemotherapy and interferon in follicular lymphoma patients: Results of the GELA-GOELAMS FL2000 study. Blood 2008; 112: 48244831.
  • 46
    Rummel M,Niederle N,Maschmeyer G, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) as first-line treatment in patients with indolent and mantle cell lymphomas (MCL): Updated results from the StiL NHL1 study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:abstract 3.
  • 47
    Watanabe T,Tobinai K,Shibata T, et al. Phase II/III study of R-CHOP-21 versus R-CHOP-14 for untreated indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: JCOG 0203 trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 39903998.
  • 48
    Czuczman MS,Koryzna A,Mohr A, et al. Rituximab in combination with fludarabine chemotherapy in low-grade or follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 694704.
  • 49
    McLaughlin P,Hagemeister FB,Rodriguez MA, et al. Safety of fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone combined with rituximab in the treatment of stage IV indolent lymphoma. Semin Oncol 2000; 27: 3741.
  • 50
    Colombat P,Salles G,Brousse N, et al. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) as single first-line therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma with a low tumor burden: Clinical and molecular evaluation. Blood 2001; 97: 101106.
  • 51
    Ghielmini M,Schmitz SF,Cogliatti SB, et al. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly x 4 schedule. Blood 2004; 103: 44164423.
  • 52
    Hainsworth JD,Burris HAIII,Morrissey LH, et al. Rituximab monoclonal antibody as initial systemic therapy for patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2000; 95: 30523056.
  • 53
    Witzig TE,Vukov AM,Habermann TM, et al. Rituximab therapy for patients with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, follicular grade I non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A phase II trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 11031108.
  • 54
    Martinelli G,Schmitz SF,Utiger U, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with follicular lymphoma receiving single-agent rituximab at two different schedules in trial SAKK 35/98. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 44804484.
  • 55
    Hochster H,Weller E,Gascoyne RD, et al. Maintenance rituximab after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone prolongs progression-free survival in advanced indolent lymphoma: Results of the randomized phase III ECOG1496 Study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 16071614.
  • 56
    Salles G,Seymour JF,Offner F, et al. Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): A phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 4251.
  • 57
    Kaminski MS,Tuck M,Estes J, et al. 131I-tositumomab therapy as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 441449.
  • 58
    Zinzani PL,Tani M,Pulsoni A, et al. Fludarabine and mitoxantrone followed by yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan in previously untreated patients with follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma trial: A phase II non-randomised trial (FLUMIZ). Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 352358.
  • 59
    Jacobs SA,Swerdlow SH,Kant J, et al. Phase II trial of short-course CHOP-R followed by 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and extended rituximab in previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 70887094.
  • 60
    Leonard JP,Coleman M,Kostakoglu L, et al. Abbreviated chemotherapy with fludarabine followed by tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab for untreated follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 56965704.
  • 61
    Press OW,Unger JM,Braziel RM, et al. Phase II trial of CHOP chemotherapy followed by tositumomab/iodine I-131 tositumomab for previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Five-year follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S9911. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 41434149.
  • 62
    Link BK,Martin P,Kaminski MS, et al. Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone followed by tositumomab and iodine-131-tositumomab in patients with untreated low-grade follicular lymphoma: Eight-year follow-up of a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 28: 30353041.
  • 63
    Morschhauser F,Radford J,Van Hoof A, et al. Phase III trial of consolidation therapy with yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared with no additional therapy after first remission in advanced follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 51565164.
  • 64
    Press OW,Unger JM,Rimsza LM, et al. A Phase III Randomized Intergroup Trial (SWOG S0016) of CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab vs. CHOP chemotherapy plus iodine-131-tositumomab for the treatment of newly diagnosed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 2011; 118:abstract 98.
  • 65
    Deconinck E,Foussard C,Milpied N, et al. High-dose therapy followed by autologous purged stem-cell transplantation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: A randomized multicenter study by GOELAMS. Blood 2005; 105: 38173823.
  • 66
    Lenz G,Dreyling M,Schiegnitz E, et al. Myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission prolongs progression-free survival in follicular lymphoma: Results of a prospective, randomized trial of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 2004; 104: 26672674.
  • 67
    Sebban C,Mounier N,Brousse N, et al. Standard chemotherapy with interferon compared with CHOP followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: The GELF-94 randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Blood 2006; 108: 25402544.
  • 68
    Ladetto M,De Marco F,Benedetti F, et al. Prospective, multicenter randomized GITMO/IIL trial comparing intensive (R-HDS) versus conventional (CHOP-R) chemoimmunotherapy in high-risk follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: The superior disease control of R-HDS does not translate into an overall survival advantage. Blood 2008; 111: 40044013.
  • 69
    Gyan E,Foussard C,Bertrand P, et al. High-dose therapy followed by autologous purged stem cell transplantation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: A randomized multicenter study by the GOELAMS with final results after a median follow-up of 9 years. Blood 2009; 113: 9951001.
  • 70
    Al Khabori M,de Almeida JR,Guyatt GH, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 1828.
  • 71
    Davis TA,Grillo-Lopez AJ,White CA, et al. Rituximab anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Safety and efficacy of re-treatment. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 31353143.
  • 72
    van Oers MH,Klasa R,Marcus RE, et al. Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: Results of a prospective randomized phase 3 intergroup trial. Blood 2006; 108: 32953301.
  • 73
    van Oers MH,Van Glabbeke M,Giurgea L, et al. Rituximab maintenance treatment of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Long-term outcome of the EORTC 20981 phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 28: 28532858.
  • 74
    Forstpointner R,Dreyling M,Repp R, et al. The addition of rituximab to a combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone (FCM) significantly increases the response rate and prolongs survival as compared with FCM alone in patients with relapsed and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: Results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 2004; 104: 30643071.
  • 75
    Friedberg JW,Cohen P,Chen L, et al. Bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent and transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Results from a phase II multicenter, single-agent study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 204210.
  • 76
    Robinson KS,Williams ME,van der Jagt RH, et al. Phase II multicenter study of bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell and mantle cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 44734479.
  • 77
    Rummel MJ,Al-Batran SE,Kim SZ, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective and has a favorable toxicity profile in the treatment of mantle cell and low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 33833389.
  • 78
    Tam CS,Wolf M,Prince HM, et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2006; 106: 24122420.
  • 79
    de Vos S,Goy A,Dakhil SR, et al. Multicenter randomized phase II study of weekly or twice-weekly bortezomib plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular or marginal-zone B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 50235030.
  • 80
    Friedberg JW,Vose JM,Kelly JL, et al. The combination of bendamustine, bortezomib, and rituximab for patients with relapsed/refractory indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2011; 117: 28072812.
  • 81
    Cheson BD. Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 2003; 101: 391398.
  • 82
    Fisher RI,Kaminski MS,Wahl RL, et al. Tositumomab and iodine-131 tositumomab produces durable complete remissions in a subset of heavily pretreated patients with low-grade and transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 75657573.
  • 83
    Witzig TE,Molina A,Gordon LI, et al. Long-term responses in patients with recurring or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with yttrium 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan. Cancer 2007; 109: 18041810.
  • 84
    Witzig TE,Gordon LI,Cabanillas F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy versus rituximab immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 24532463.
  • 85
    Kaminski MS,Radford JA,Gregory SA, et al. Re-treatment with I-131 tositumomab in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who had previously responded to I-131 tositumomab. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 79857993.
  • 86
    Ganem G,Cartron G,Girinsky T, et al. Localized low-dose radiotherapy for follicular lymphoma: History, clinical results, mechanisms of action, and future outlooks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78: 975982.
  • 87
    Luthy SK,Ng AK,Silver B, et al. Response to low-dose involved-field radiotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:2043–2047.
  • 88
    Rohatiner AZ,Nadler L,Davies AJ, et al. Myeloablative therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for follicular lymphoma at the time of second or subsequent remission: Long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 25542559.
  • 89
    Bierman PJ,Vose JM,Anderson JR, et al. High-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic rescue for follicular low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 445450.
  • 90
    Cao TM,Horning S,Negrin RS, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic-cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma beyond first remission: The Stanford University experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7: 294301.
  • 91
    Safar V,Gastinne T,Milpied N, et al. Very long term follow-up of autologous stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma: A retrospective single-institution experience. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 183.
  • 92
    Bastion Y,Brice P,Haioun C, et al. Intensive therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in 60 patients with poor-prognosis follicular lymphoma. Blood 1995; 86: 32573262.
  • 93
    Schouten HC,Qian W,Kvaloy S, et al. High-dose therapy improves progression-free survival and survival in relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Results from the randomized European CUP trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 39183927.
  • 94
    Pettengell R,Schmitz N,Gisselbrecht C, et al. Randomized study of rituximab in patients with relapsed or resistant follicular lymphoma prior to high-dose therapy as in vivo purging and to maintain remission following high-dose therapy. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 574 abstract 8005.
  • 95
    van Besien K,Loberiza FRJr,Bajorunaite R, et al. Comparison of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma. Blood 2003; 102: 35213529.
  • 96
    Khouri IF,McLaughlin P,Saliba RM, et al. Eight-year experience with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular lymphoma after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Blood 2008; 111: 55305536.
  • 97
    Hari P,Carreras J,Zhang MJ, et al. Allogeneic transplants in follicular lymphoma: Higher risk of disease progression after reduced-intensity compared to myeloablative conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 236245.
  • 98
    Tomblyn M,Brunstein C,Burns LJ, et al. Similar and promising outcomes in lymphoma patients treated with myeloablative or nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 538545.
  • 99
    Tomblyn MR,Ewell M,Bredeson C, et al. Autologous versus reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with chemosensitive follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma beyond first complete response or first partial response. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 10511057.
  • 100
    Leonard JP,Friedberg JW,Younes A, et al. A phase I/II study of galiximab (an anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody) in combination with rituximab for relapsed or refractory, follicular lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 12161223.
  • 101
    Bence-Bruckler I,Macdonald D,Stiff P, et al. A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab + galiximab vs rituximab + placebo in advanced follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Blood 2010; 116:abstract 428.
  • 102
    Leonard JP,Schuster SJ,Emmanouilides C, et al. Durable complete responses from therapy with combined epratuzumab and rituximab: Final results from an international multicenter, phase 2 study in recurrent, indolent, non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2008; 113: 27142723.
  • 103
    Grant B,Leonard J,Johnson J, et al. Combination biologic therapy as initial treatment for follicular lymphoma: Initial results from CALGB 50701—A phase II trial of extended induction epratuzumab (anti-CD22) and rituximab (anti-CD20). Blood 2010; 116:abstract 427.
  • 104
    Freedman A,Kuruvilla J,Assouline S, et al. Clinical activity of Lucatumumab (HCD122) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in a phase Ia/II clinical trial (NCT00670592). Blood 2010; 116:abstract 284.
  • 105
    Hagenbeek A,Gadeberg O,Johnson P, et al. First clinical use of ofatumumab, a novel fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: Results of a phase 1/2 trial. Blood 2008; 111: 54865495.
  • 106
    Morschhauser F,Leonard JP,Fayad L, et al. Humanized anti-CD20 antibody, veltuzumab, in refractory/recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Phase I/II results. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 33463353.
  • 107
    Morschhauser F,Marlton P,Vitolo U, et al. Results of a phase I/II study of ocrelizumab, a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Ann Oncol 21: 18701876.
  • 108
    Salles G,Morschhauser F,Thieblemont C, et al. Promising efficacy with the new anti-CD20 antibody GA101 in heavily pre-treated NHL patients—Updated results with encouraging progression free survival (PFS) data from a phase II study in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL (iNHL). Blood 2010; 116:abstract 2868.
  • 109
    Friedberg JW,Neuberg D,Gribben JG, et al. Combination immunotherapy with rituximab and interleukin 2 in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2002; 117: 828834.
  • 110
    Friedberg JW,Kelly JL,Neuberg D, et al. Phase II study of a TLR-9 agonist (1018 ISS) with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2009; 146: 282291.
  • 111
    Friedberg JW,Kim H,McCauley M, et al. Combination immunotherapy with a CpG oligonucleotide (1018 ISS) and rituximab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Increased interferon-alpha/beta-inducible gene expression, without significant toxicity. Blood 2005; 105: 489495.
  • 112
    Friedberg JW. Treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: The old and the new. Semin Hematol 2008; 45: S2-S6.
  • 113
    Freedman A,Neelapu SS,Nichols C, et al. Placebo-controlled phase III trial of patient-specific immunotherapy with mitumprotimut-T and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 30363043.
  • 114
    Schuster SJ,Neelapu SS,Gause BL, et al. Vaccination with patient-specific tumor-derived antigen in first remission improves disease-free survival in follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 27872794.
  • 115
    Kahl B,Byrd J,Flinn I, et al. Clinical safety and activity in a phase 1 study of CAL-101, An isoform-selective inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase P110δ, in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2010; 116:abstract 1777.
  • 116
    Fowler F,Porte Sharman J,Smith S, et al. The Btk inhibitor, PCI-32765, induces durable responses with minimal toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies: Results from a phase I study. Blood 2010; 116:abstract 964.
  • 117
    Friedberg JW,Sharman J,Sweetenham J, et al. Inhibition of Syk with fostamatinib disodium has significant clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2010; 115: 25782585.