Get access

An evolutionary review of human telomere biology: The thrifty telomere hypothesis and notes on potential adaptive paternal effects


  • Dan T.A. Eisenberg

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-1330
    • Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Ave., Evanston, IL 60208-1330, USA
    Search for more papers by this author


Telomeres, repetitive DNA sequences found at the ends of linear chromosomes, play a role in regulating cellular proliferation, and shorten with increasing age in proliferating human tissues. The rate of age-related shortening of telomeres is highest early in life and decreases with age. Shortened telomeres are thought to limit the proliferation of cells and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although natural selection is widely assumed to operate against long telomeres because they entail increased cancer risk, the evidence for this is mixed. Instead, here it is proposed that telomere length is primarily limited by energetic constraints. Cell proliferation is energetically expensive, so shorter telomeres should lead to a thrifty phenotype. Shorter telomeres are proposed to restrain adaptive immunity as an energy saving mechanism. Such a limited immune system, however, might also result in chronic infections, inflammatory stress, premature aging, and death—a more “disposable soma.” With an increased reproductive lifespan, the fitness costs of premature aging are higher and longer telomeres will be favored by selection. Telomeres exhibit a paternal effect whereby the offspring of older fathers have longer telomeres due to increased telomere lengths of sperm with age. This paternal effect is proposed to be an adaptive signal of the expected age of male reproduction in the environment offspring are born into. The offspring of lineages of older fathers will tend to have longer, and thereby less thrifty, telomeres, better preparing them for an environment with higher expected ages at reproduction. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2011. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Get access to the full text of this article