SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aarts L, Burkhauser RV, de Jong PR. 1996. Curing the Dutch disease. An international perspective on disability policy reform. Avebury, U.K.: Aldershot.
  • Accident Compensation Commission. 2010. Annual report 2010 Wellington: Accident Compensation Commission.
  • Anema J, Schellart A, Cassidy J, Loisel P, Veerman T, Van der Beek A. 2009. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 19: 419426.
  • Armstrong H, Laurs R. 2007. Vocational independence: Outcomes for ACC claimants: A follow up study of 160 claimants who have been deemed vocationally independent by ACC and case law analysis of the vocational independence process. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Labour. p 90.
  • Astroff RE. 1998. Sick and tired of being sick and tired: Multiple chemical sensitivity and the law. J Environ Law Pract 8: 4762.
  • Aubé I. 2008. Analyse du traitement des plaintes pour harcèlement psychologique par le processus de médiation de la Commission des normes du travail (C.N.T.) et du traitement des réclamations pour lésions professionnelles attribuables au harcèlement psychologique par le processus de conciliation de la Commission des lésions professionnelles (C.L.P.): Université du Québec à Montréal.
  • Aubé I. 2009. Modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges relatifs au harcèlement psychologique. Regards sur le travail Québec: Ministe`re du Travail. p 13–18.
  • Azaroff LS, Levenstein C, Wegman DH. 2002. Occupational injury and illness surveillance: Conceptual filters explain underreporting. Am J Public Health 92: 14211429.
  • Azaroff LS, Lax MB, Levenstein C, Wegman DH. 2004. Wounding the messenger: The new economy makes occupational health indicators too good to be true. Int J Health Serv 34: 271303.
  • Beardwood BA, Kirsh B, Clark NJ. 2005. Victims twice over: Perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qual Health Res 15: 3048.
  • Bernhard D, MacEachen E, Lippel K. 2010. Disability management experts and the impact of jurisdiction on practice: An Ontario example. Int J Soc Secur Work Compens 2: 116.
  • Biddle J, Roberts K. 2003. Claiming behavior in workers' compensation. J Risk Insur 70: 759780.
  • Block RN, Roberts K. 2000. A comparison of labour standards in the United States and Canada. Ind Relat 55: 273307.
  • Blumkin T, Margalioth YY, Sadka E. 2008. The role of stigma in the design of welfare programs. SSRN eLibrary: http://ssrn.com/paper=1137843 consulted December 30, 2011.
  • Boden LI, Biddle EA, Spieler EA. 2001. Social and economic impacts of workplace illness and injury: Current and future directions for research. Am J Ind Med 40: 398402.
  • Bohme SR, Egilman D. 2008. Beyond reputation: Debate on the role of corporate influence in occupational and environmental medicine. New Solut 18: 317324.
  • Callander M, Page SJ. 2003. Managing risk in adventure tourism operations in New Zealand: A review of the legal case history and potential for litigation. Tourism Manage 24: 1323.
  • Campbell I. 1996. Compensation for personal injury in New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press. 286 p.
  • Campolieti M. 2002. Moral hazard and disability insurance: On the incidence of hard-to-diagnose medical conditions in the Canada/Quebec Pension Plan Disability Program. Can Public Policy XXVIII: 419441.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59: 897–929 at p. 899.
  • Chung J, Cole DC, Clarke J. 2000. Women, work and injury. In: Sullivan T, editor. Injury and the new world of work. Vancouver-Toronto: UBC Press. p 6990.
  • Coole C, Drummond A, Watson P, Radford K. 2010. What concerns workers with low back pain? Findings of a qualitative study of patients referred for rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 20: 472480.
  • Cox R, Lippel K. 2008. Falling through the legal cracks: The pitfalls of using workers' compensation data as indicators of work-related injuries and illnesses. Policy Pract Health Saf 6: 930.
  • Cranor CF. 2006. Toxic torts: Science, law, and the possibility of justice. New York: Cambridge University Press. 398 p.
  • Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. 2001. Doctor proactive communication, return-to-work recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers' compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 43: 515525.
  • Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Fitzjohn J, Hider P, Briant R, Schug S. 2002. Compensation for medical injury in New Zealand: Does “no fault” increase the level of claims making and reduce social and clinical selectivity? J Health Polit Policy Law 27: 833854.
  • Dembe A, Boden L. 2000. Moral hazard: A question of morality? New Solut 10: 257279.
  • Dew K. 2002. Accident insurance, sickness and science: New Zealand's no-fault system. Int J Health Serv 32: 163178.
  • Eakin JM. 2005. The discourse of abuse in return to work: A hidden epidemic of suffering. In: Peterson CL, Mayhew C, editors. Occupational health and safety: International Influences and the “New” epidemics Amityville. New York: Baywood Publishing co., Inc. p 159174.
  • Eakin JM. 2010. Towards a ‘standpoint’ perspective: health and safety in small workplaces from the perspective of the workers Policy Pract Health Saf 8: 113127.
  • Eakin JM, MacEachen E. 2003. Playing it smart' with return to work: Small workplace experience under Ontario's policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Saf 1: 1942.
  • Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Mansfield E, Clarke J. 2009. The logic of practice: An ethnographic study of front-line service work with small businesses in Ontario's Workplace Safety and Insurance Board: Institute for Work & Health. p 38.
  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. 2007. Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational safety and health. European Risk Observatory Report Belgium: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. p 126.
  • Fabris S. 2004. Fibromyalgie: l'Accès aux indemnités prévues dans la Loi sur les accidents du travail et les maladies professionnelles dans un contexte d'incertitude scientifique et médicale. Développements récents en droit de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (2004): 275–306.
  • Fair Practices Commission of Ontario. 2009. Annual Report Toronto: Fair Practices Commission.
  • Fishback PV, Kantor SE. 2000. A Prelude to the Welfare State: The Origins of Workers' Compensation Chicago. London: The University of Chicago Press. 316 p.
  • Franche R-L, Severin C, Lee H, Hogg-Johnson S, Hepburn C, Vidmar M, MacEachen E. 2009. Perceived justice of compensation process for return-to-work: Development and validation of a scale. Psychol Inj Law 2: 225237.
  • Grant G, Studdert D. 2009. Poisoned Chalice? a critical analysis of the evidence linking personal injury compensation processes with adverse health outcomes. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 33: 125.
  • Gravel S, Vissandjee B, Lippel K, Brodeur J-M, Patry L, Champagne F. 2010. Ethics and the compensation of immigrant workers for work-related injuries and illnesses. J Immigrant Minor Health 12: 707714.
  • Guidotti TL. 2008. Occupational medicine and the construction of “difficult reputations”. New Solut 18: 285298.
  • Guthrie R. 2002a. Negociation, power in conciliation, and review of compensation claims. Law Policy 24: 229268.
    Direct Link:
  • Guthrie R. 2002b. The dismissal of workers covered by return to work provisions under workers compensation laws. Eur J Indus Relat 44: 545561.
    Direct Link:
  • Guthrie R, Quinlan M. 2005. The occupational safety and health rights and workers' compensation entitlements of illegal immigrants: An emerging challenge. Policy Pract Health Saf 3: 6989.
  • Hamm RM, Reiss DM, Paul RK, Bursztajn HJ. 2007. Knocking at the wrong door: Insured workers' inadequate psychiatric care and workers' compensation claims. Int J Law Psychiatry 30: 416426.
  • Hepburn CG, Kelloway EK, Franche R-L. 2010. Early employer response to workplace injury: What injured workers perceive as fair and why these perceptions matter. J Occup Health Psychol 15: 409420.
  • Herbert R, Janeway K, Schechter C. 1999. Carpal tunnel syndrome and workers' compensation among an occupational clinic population in New York State. Am J Ind Med 35: 335342.
  • Himmelstein J, Buchanan JL, Dembe AE, Stevens B. 1999. Health services research in workers' compensation medical care: Policy issues and research opportunities. Health Serv Res 34: 427437.
  • Hurley J, Pasic D, Lavis JN, Culyer AJ, Mustard C, Gnam W. 2008. Parallel payers and preferred access: How Canada's workers' compensation boards expedite care for injured and ill workers. Healthc Pap 8: 614.
  • Ison TG. 1968. The forensic lottery a critique on tort liability as a system of personal injury compensation. London: Staples Press.
  • Ison TG. 1980. Accident compensation: A commentary on the New Zealand scheme. London: Croom Helm.
  • Ison TG. 1986. The therapeutic significance of compensation structures. Canad Bar Rev 64: 605637.
  • Ison TG. 1998. Workers' compensation systems. In: Stellman JM, editor. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th edition. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  • Ison TG. 2008. Statistical significance and the distraction of “scientific proof”. Canad Bar Rev 87: 119159.
  • Jasanoff S. 1995. Science at the bar: Law, science and technology in America Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Jaye C, Fitzgerald R. 2010. Embodying occupational overuse syndrome. Health XX: 116.
  • Johnstone R, Mayhew C, Quinlan M. 2001. Outsourcing risk?: The regulation of OHS where contractors are employed. Comp Labor Law Policy J 22: 351393.
  • Kok R, Hoving JL, Verbeek JH, Schaafsma FG, Smits PBA, van Dijk FJH. 2008. Evaluation of a workshop on evidence-based medicine for social insurance physicians. Occup Med 58: 8387.
  • Kosny A, MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Chambers L. 2011. The role of health care providers in long term and complicated workers' compensation claims. J Occup Rehabil 21: 582590.
  • Lacerte M, Forcier P, Hall M. 2004. Independent medical examinations for insurance and legal reports, 2nd edition. Markham: LexisNexis Canada, Inc. iiixii and 293 p.
  • LaDou J. 2006. Occupational and environmental medicine in the United States: A proposal to abolish workers' compensation and reestablish the public health model. Int J Occup Environ Health 12: 154168.
  • Lax M, Manetti FA. 2001. Access to medical care for individuals with workers' compensation claims. New Solut 11: 325348.
  • Le Page JA, Iverson GL, Collins P. 2008. The impact of judges' perceptions of credibility in fibromyalgia claims. Int J Law Psychiatry 31: 3040.
  • Leigh J, Macaskill P, Kuosma E, Mandryk J. 1999. Global burden of disease and injury due to occupational factors. Epidemiology 10: 626631.
  • Lippel K. 1981 –1982. Droit des travailleurs québécois en matière de santé, 1885–1981. Revue Juridique Thémis 16: 329382.
  • Lippel K. 1992. L'incertitude des probabilités en droit et en médecine. Revue de droit de l'Université de Sherbrooke. p 445–472.
  • Lippel K. 1999. Therapeutic and anti-therapeutic consequences of workers' compensation systems. Int J Law Psychiatry 22: 521546.
  • Lippel K. 2003a. Compensation for musculo-skeletal disorders in Quebec: Systemic discrimination against women workers? Int J Health Serv 33: 253281.
  • Lippel K. 2003b. The private policing of injured workers in Canada: Legitimate management practices or human rights violations? Policy Pract Health Saf 01: 121.
  • Lippel K. 2007. Workers describe the effect of the workers' compensation process on their health: A Quebec study. Int J Law Psychiatry 30: 427443.
  • Lippel K. 2008. Workers' Compensation and controversial illnesses. In: Moss P, Teghtsoonian K, editors. Contesting illness: Processes and practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p 4768.
  • Lippel K. 2010a. Workers' compensation for asbestos related disease in five Canadian provinces. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1663408: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the Occupational Health Clinics For Ontario Workers (OHCOW).
  • Lippel K. 2010b. Le droit comme outil de maintien en emploi: Rôle protecteur, rôle destructeur Revue Pistes, http://www.pistes.uqam.ca/v12n1/pdf/v12n1a2.pdf
  • Lippel K. 2011. Law, public policy and mental health in the workplace. Healthc Pap 11: 2037.
  • Lippel K, Sikka A. 2010. Access to workers' compensation benefits and other legal protections for work-related mental health problems: A Canadian overview. Can J Public Health 101: S-16S-22.
  • Lippel K, Messing K, Stock S, Vézina N. 1999. La preuve de la causalité et l'indemnisation des lésions attribuables au travail répétitif: Rencontre des sciences de la santé et du droit. Windsor Yearbook Access Justice 17: 3585.
  • MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. 2006. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 32: 257269.
  • MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Chambers L. 2007a. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf 5: 4162.
  • MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. 2007b. Unexpected barriers in return to work: Lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work 29: 155164.
  • MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. 2010. The “toxic dose” of system problems: Why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil 20: 349366.
  • MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Lippel K, Neilson C, Franche R-L, Pugliese D. 2011. The ‘ability’ paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: Challenges in an Ontario injured worker retraining program. J Occup Rehabil 20: 113.
  • Marshall K. 2003. Les avantages de l'emploi/Benefits of the job. no 75-001-XIF au catalogue de Statistique. Canada: Statistique Canada. p 514.
  • McGuirk B, Bogduk N. 2007. Evidence-based care for low back pain in workers eligible for compensation. Occup Med 57: 3642.
  • Meershoek A, Krumeich A, Vos R. 2007. Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes. Sociol Health Illn 29: 497514.
  • Messing K. 2002. La place des femmes dans les priorités de recherche en santé au travail au Québec (Women's Place in Workplace Health Research Priorities in Québec). Ind Relat 57: 660686.
  • Michaels D. 2008. Doubt is their product—How industry's assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press. 372 p.
  • Miller R. 1993. An analysis and critique of the 1992 changes to New Zealand's accident compensation scheme. Md Law Rev 52: 10701092.
  • Morse T, Punnett L, Warren N, Dillon C, Warren A. 2003. The relationship of unions to prevalence and claim filing for work-related upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med 44: 8393.
  • Morse T, Grey M, Storey E, Kenta-Bib E. 2004. Occupational disease in Connecticut, 2001. Conn Med 68: 131138.
  • Mustard CA, Dickie C, Chan S. 2008. Disability income security benefits for working-age Canadians. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health.
  • New Zealand Royal Commission of Inquiry into Compensation for Personal Injury. 1967. Compensation for personal injury in New Zealand: Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry. Wellington: New Zealand Royal Commission of Inquiry into Compensation for Personal Injury.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2003. Transforming disability into ability: Policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2007. Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Australia, Luxembourg, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands: Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2009. Sickness, disability and work: Keeping on track in the economic downturn. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010. Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Canada. Opportunities for Collaboration. Paris: OECD.
  • Pennings F. 2002. Dutch social security law in an international context. Amsterdam: Kluwer. p 279.
  • Philips T. 2010a. I never wanted to be a quack!: the professional deviance of plaintiff experts in contested illness lawsuits: The case of multiple chemical sensitivites. Med Anthropol Q 24: 182198.
  • Phillips T. 2010. Debating the legitimacy of a contested environmental illness: A case study of multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). Sociol Health Illn 32: 10261040.
  • Pieters D, editor. 2000. Changing work patterns and social security—EISS Yearbook 1999. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  • Poitras J, Bélair F, Byrne S. 2005. A reflection on unintended consequences of workplace mediation. Confl Resolution Q 23: 43.
  • Pransky G, Snyder T, Dembe A, Himmelstein J. 1999. Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: A case study and review of the literature. Ergonomics 42: 171182.
  • Premji S, Messing K, Lippel K. 2008a. Broken English, broken bones? Mechanisms linking language proficiency and occupational health in a Montreal garment factory. Int J Health Serv 38: 119.
  • Premji S, Messing K, Lippel K. 2008b. Would a “one-handed” scientist lack rigor? How scientists discuss the work-relatedness of musculoskeletal disorders in formal and informal communications. Am J Ind Med 51: 173185.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2008. Accident compensation corporation New Zealand scheme review. New Zealand: PricewaterhouseCoopers. p 48.
  • Quinlan M. 2004. Workers' compensation and the challenges posed by changing patterns of work: Evidence from Australia. Policy Pract Health Saf 2: 4370.
  • Quinlan M, Mayhew C. 1999. Precarious employment and workers' compensation. Int J Law Psychiatry 22: 491520.
  • Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P. 2001. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: placing the debate in a comparative historical context. Int J Health Serv 31: 507536.
  • Quinlan M, Bohle P, Lamm F. 2010. Managing occupational health and safety: A multidisciplinary approach, 3rd edition. Melbourne: Macmillan.
  • Reid J, Ewan C, Lowy E. 1991. Pilgrimage of pain: The illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility. Soc Sci Med 32: 601612.
  • Roberts-Yates DC. 2003. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: The need for new operational frameworks. Disabil Rehabil 25: 898907.
  • Roberts-Yates C. 2006. Employers' perceptions of claims/injury management and rehabilitation in South Australia. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 44: 102122.
  • Réseau ‘Surveiller les Cancers d'Origine Professionnelle en Seine Saint-Denis’ (GISCOP93). 2005. Occupational cancer in a Paris suburb: First results of a proactive research study in Seine Saint-Denis. Int J Occup Environ Health 11: 263275.
  • Sager L, James C. 2005. Injured workers' perspectives of their rehabilitation process under the New South Wales Workers Compensation System. Aust Occup Ther J 52: 127135.
  • Sen A. 2000. The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. J Legal Stud 29: 931952.
  • Shannon HS, Lowe G. 2002. How many injured workers do not file claims for workers' compensation benefits. Am J Ind Med 42: 467473.
  • Smith CK, Silverstein BA, Bonauto DK, Adams D, Fan ZJ. 2010. Temporary workers in Washington State. Am J Ind Med 53: 135145.
  • Soklaridis S, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD. 2010. Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: Psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Soc Sci Med 71: 15571566.
  • Spearing N, Connelly LB. 2011. Is injury compensation “bad for health”? A systematic meta-review. Injury 42: 1524.
  • Stahl C. 2010. In cooperation we trust: Interorganizational cooperation in return-to-work and labour market reintegration Linköping. Sweden: National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Linköping University.
  • Strunin L, Boden LI. 2000. Paths of reentry: Employment experiences of injured workers. Am J Ind Med 38: 373384.
  • Strunin L, Boden L. 2004. The workers' compensation system: Worker friend or foe ? Am J Ind Med 45: 338345.
  • Sugarman SD. 1998. Quebec's comprehensive auto no-fault scheme and the failure of any of the United States to follow. Cah Droit 39: 303333.
  • Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. 2008. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: Scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 18: 249261.
  • Thomason T, Pozzebon S. 2002. Determinants of firm workplace health and safety and claims management practices. Ind Labor Relat Rev 55: 286307.
  • Underhill E. 2008. Double jeopardy: Occupational injury and rehabilitation of temporary agency workers. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • van Oorschot W, Abrahamson P. 2003. The Dutch and Danish miracles revisited: A critical discussion of activation policies in two small welfare states. Soc Policy Adm 37: 288304.
  • van Oorschot WJH, Boos K. 2000. The battle against numbers: Disability policies in the Netherlands. Eur J Soc Secur 2: 343361.
  • Vézina M, Cloutier E, Stock S, Lippel K, Fortin É, Delisle A, St-Vincent M, Funès A, Duguay P, Vézina S, Prud'homme P. 2011. Québec Survey on Working and Employment Conditions and Occupational Health and Safety (EQCOTESST). Montreal: Institut de Recherche Robert Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité du Travail; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Institut de la Statistique du Québec. p 49. http://www.inspq.qc.ca/english/publications/default.asp?NumPublication=1356
  • Waddell G, Aylward M, Sawney P. 2002. Comparison of sickness and disability arrangements in various countries. Back Pain, Incapacity for Work and Social Security Benefits: An international literature review and analysis. The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, London, UK. p 7399.
  • Wilthagen T. 2002. Managing social risks with transitional labour markets. In: Schömann K, Mosley H, O'Reilly J, Schmid G, editors. Labour markets, gender and institutional change: Essays in honour of Günther Schmid Northampton. MA: Edward Elgar. p 264289.
  • Yerkes M, Tijdens K. 2010. Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands. Eur J Indus Relat 16: 369383.
  • Legal and Statistical References
  • ACC coverage: http://www.acc.co.nz/making-a-claim/am-i-covered/index.htm#P12_761.
  • ACC experience rating: http://www.acc.co.nz/for-business/experience-rating/index.htm.
  • Association of Workers' Compensation Boards of Canada (AWCBC, 2011): http://www.awcbc.org/, consulted December 30, 2011.
  • Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail. 2000. Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail: Rapport annuel d'activité 2000: Québec.
  • Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail. 2005. Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail: Rapport annuel d'activité 2004: Québec.
  • Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail. 2010. Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail: Rapport annuel d'activité 2009: Québec.
  • Commission des lésions professionnelles. 2000. Rapport annuel de gestion 1999–2000: Commission des lésions professionnelles: Québec.
  • Commission des lésions professionnelles. 2005. Rapport annuel de gestion 2004–2005: Commission des lésions professionnelles: Québec.
  • Commission des lésions professionnelles. 2010. Rapport annuel de gestion 2009–2010: Commission des lésions professionnelles: Québec.
  • ILO Convention No. C017 on Workmen's Compensation (Accidents) and C018 on Workmen's Compensation (Occupational Diseases), both adopted in 1925, have been ratified, respectively, by 71 and 60 countries, although neither the United States nor Canada ratified these conventions. The Conventions were revised by convention C121, the Employment Injury Benefits Convention, 1964 http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/newratframeE.htm.
  • ILO Convention C130, Medical Care and Sickness Benefits Convention, 1969, http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/newratframeE.htm. 15 countries, including several European and Latin American countries, have ratified this convention, although neither Canada nor the United States are among them. The Canadian sickness insurance system (Employment Insurance) would not meet the exigencies of this convention, which requires economic support for the sick for at least 52 weeks at a minimum of 60% of the worker's salary.
  • Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Laseur: 2003 Supreme Court of Canada. 54.
  • Safework Australia 2011, Comparison of Workers' Compensation Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand (2011), http://safeworkaustralia.gov.au/AboutSafeWorkAustralia/WhatWeDo/Publications/Pages/comparison2011.aspx.
  • Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal. 2006. 2005 Annual Report, Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal, Richmond, British Columbia.
  • Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal. 2010. Annual Report, Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal, Richmond, British Columbia.
  • Workers' Compensation Board of B.C. 2000. Statistics 2000, Workers' Compensation Board of B.C : Vancouver.
  • Workers' Compensation Board of B.C. 2001. 2000 Annual Report of the Appeal Division, Workers' Compensation Board of B.C: Vancouver.
  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. 2001. Annual Report 2000, Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal: Toronto.
  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. 2006. Annual Report 2005, Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal: Toronto.
  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. 2010. WSIAT Annual Report 2009, Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal: Toronto.
  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. 2010. WSIB Ontario Statistical Supplement to the 2009 Annual Report, WSIB Ontario : Toronto.
  • Worksafe BC, WorksafeBC Statistics. 2005. http://www.worksafebc.com/publications/reports/annual_reports/pub_10_20.asp.
  • Worksafe BC, WorksafeBC Statistics. 2009. http://www.worksafebc.com/publications/reports/annual_reports/pub_10_20.asp.