Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the statements, opinions or conclusions of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), or National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low-income workers: Applying a social ecological framework
Article first published online: 26 MAR 2013
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Special Issue: Achieving Health Equity in the Workplace
Volume 57, Issue 5, pages 539–556, May 2014
How to Cite
Baron, S. L., Beard, S., Davis, L. K., Delp, L., Forst, L., Kidd-Taylor, A., Liebman, A. K., Linnan, L., Punnett, L. and Welch, L. S. (2014), Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low-income workers: Applying a social ecological framework. Am. J. Ind. Med., 57: 539–556. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22174
Disclosure Statement: The authors report no conflicts of interests.
- Issue published online: 7 APR 2014
- Article first published online: 26 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 JAN 2013
- health inequities;
- low-income workers;
- total worker health;
Nearly one of every three workers in the United States is low-income. Low-income populations have a lower life expectancy and greater rates of chronic diseases compared to those with higher incomes. Low- income workers face hazards in their workplaces as well as in their communities. Developing integrated public health programs that address these combined health hazards, especially the interaction of occupational and non-occupational risk factors, can promote greater health equity.
We apply a social-ecological perspective in considering ways to improve the health of the low-income working population through integrated health protection and health promotion programs initiated in four different settings: the worksite, state and local health departments, community health centers, and community-based organizations.
Examples of successful approaches to developing integrated programs are presented in each of these settings. These examples illustrate several complementary venues for public health programs that consider the complex interplay between work-related and non work-related factors, that integrate health protection with health promotion and that are delivered at multiple levels to improve health for low-income workers.
Whether at the workplace or in the community, employers, workers, labor and community advocates, in partnership with public health practitioners, can deliver comprehensive and integrated health protection and health promotion programs. Recommendations for improved research, training, and coordination among health departments, health practitioners, worksites and community organizations are proposed. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:539–556, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.