Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research
Version of Record online: 27 JUN 2013
© 2013 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A</i> Published Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Volume 161, Issue 8, pages 2099–2101, August 2013
How to Cite
2013. Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research. Am J Med Genet Part A. 161A:2099–2101., , , , .
- Issue online: 24 JUL 2013
- Version of Record online: 27 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 APR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 24 JAN 2013
- Health Innovation Challenge Fund. Grant Number: HICF-1009-003
- Cambridge South REC. Grant Number: 10/H0305/83
- Republic of Ireland REC. Grant Number: GEN/284/12
- 2010. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Sci Transl Med 2:3–5. , .
- 2012. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: Findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genet Med 14:451–457. , , , .
- 2011. Managing incidental findings from genomic testing: A public perspective. Montreal, Canada: International Congress of Human Genetics. P 1341T. , , , , .
- 2012. Return of results: Not that complicated? Genet Med 14:358–3360. , .
- for the DDD study. 2011. The Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study. Dev Med Child Neurol 53:702–703. , .
- 2013. ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Report accessed from www.acmg.net 8th April 2013. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2012. Incidental findings in genetic research and clinical diagnostic tests: A systematic review. Am J Med Genet Part A 158A:3159–3167. , , , .
- 2012. An empirical examination of the management of return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks. Genet Med 14:444–450. , , .
- 2009. Return of “accurate” and “actionable” results: Yes! Am J Bioeth 9:107–109. , .
- 2006. The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 14:1170–1178. , , , .
- 2006. The incidentalome. JAMA 296:212–215. , , .
- 2012. Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. Am J Med Genet Part A 161A:542–549. , , , , .
- 2010. Personal genome research: What should the participant be told? Trends Genet 26:199–201. , .
- 2010. Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research. J Empire Res Hum Res Ethics 5:31–41. , , , .
- 2008a. When research seems like clinical care: A qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results. BMC Med Ethics 9. , , , , .
- 2008b. Incidental findings in human subjects research: What do investigators owe research participants? J Law Med Ethics 36:271–279. , , .
- 2010. What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants. Eur J Hum Genet 18:867–871. , , .
- 2006. Returning genetic research results to individuals: Points-to-consider. Bioethics 20:24–36. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2002. The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think? Arch Intern Med 162:1457–1462. , .
- 2008. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36:219–248. , , , , , , , , , , et al.