Dr. Burke is Professor and former Chair of the Department of Bioethics and Humanities and is an internist and medical geneticist. Her research interests include the ethical and policy implications of genomics.
Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care
Article first published online: 10 MAR 2014
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Special Issue: Implementation of Genomic Medicine
Volume 166, Issue 1, pages 105–111, March 2014
How to Cite
2014. Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 166C:105–111., , .
Conflict of interest: none.
* Correspondence to: Wylie Burke, M.D., Ph.D., University of Washington, Box 357120, 1959 NE Pacific, Rm A204 Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: email@example.com
- Issue published online: 18 MAR 2014
- Article first published online: 10 MAR 2014
- National Institutes of Health (National Human Genome Research Institute and National Cancer Institute) U01HG006507 U01HG007307
- Ande v. Rock. Rock, 256 Wis.2d.365, 647 N.W.2d 265 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002), cert. denied, 650 N.W.2d 840 (Wis. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1107 (2003).
- 2011. You never call, you never write: Why return of “omic” results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative. Per Med 8:651–657. .
- 2008. Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 38:5–6; author reply 6–7. , .
- 2012. A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:11920–11927. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2013. Biobank participants' perspectives on aggregate result return. Am Soc Hum Genet National Meeting, Boston. , , , , .
- 2010. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Sci Transl Med 2:38cm20. , .
- 1993. Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA 269:1970–1974; Erratum in: JAMA 1993 Aug 18; 270: 832. , , , , , , .
- 2006. Redefining physicians' duties: An argument for eliminating the physician-patient relationship requirement in actions for medical malpractice. Georgia Law Rev 40:573–613. .
- 2012. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: Findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genet Med 14:451–457. , , , .
- NHLBI Working Group. 2006. Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet Part A 140A:1033–1040. , , , , , , , , , , , ,
- 2012. The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genet Med 14:473–477. , .
- 1988. Pub. L. No. 100-578, 102 Stat. 2903 (codified as amended at 42 U. S. C. § 263a (2006) see regulations at 42 C.F.R. pt. 493.
- Common Rule, 45 C.F.R. § 46.101–.124. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#46.111
- 1995. Patient-physician covenant. JAMA 273:1553. , , , , , , , .
- CSER: Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research National Human Genome Research Institute. http://www.genome.gov/27546194
- 2009. Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: State of the science. Clin Cancer Res 15:4270–4276. .
- GRRIP Consortium. 2012. Genetics researchers' and IRB professionals' attitudes toward genetic research review: A comparative analysis. Genet Med 14:236–242. , , , , , , , , ,
- 2013. Minimizing liability risks under the ACMG recommendations for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 15:915–920. .
- 2010. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 3:574–580; [PMC3090664]. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2004. Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. CMAJ 170:1417–1419. , , .
- 2009. The legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects? Food Drug Law J 64:235–260. .
- 2013. Physicians, surgeons, and other healers. Am Jurisprudence 2nd: Physicians, Surgeons 61. Eagan, MN: Thomson Reuters, database updated through May 2013, §130. , , , .
- 2007. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 8:343–364. .
- 2012. Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research. Genet Med 14:611–615. , .
- 2007. Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med 4:e324. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- HIPAA Privacy Rule: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 18, 26 29, 42 U. S.C.); see regulations at 45 C.F.R. pts. 160, 164.
- 2011. Genomics, health care, and society. New Engl J Med 365:1033–1041. .
- 1997. Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 6:385–396. , .
- 2013. Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Genet Med 15:888–895. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2006. The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 14:1170–1178. , , , .
- 2010. Multidimensional results reporting to participants in genomic studies: Getting it right. Sci Transl Med 2: 37cm19; DOI: 1126/scitranslmed.3000809 , .
- 2013. Evidence of physician and patient relationship. Am Jurisprudence Proof of Facts, 2nd Eagan, MN: Thomson Reuters, database updated through April 2013; 46: 373 §§ 3, 5 6, 9. .
- 2013. Maternal perspectives on the return of genetic results: Context matters. Am J Med Genet A 161A:38–47. , , , , , , , .
- 2012. Biobank participation and returning research results: Perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A 158A:1029–1037. Direct Link:, , .
- 2013. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: A survey study. Clin Genet 84:230–236. , , , , .
- 2006. Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects. J Med Ethics 32:542–547. , .
- 2008. Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. J Med Ethics 34:210–213. , , , .
- 2008. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 8:36–43. , , , , , .
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1999. Research involving human biological materials: Ethical issues and policy guidance. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield VA.
- 2011. Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results. Public Health Genom 14:346–355. , .
- 2006a. Rethinking respect for persons enrolled in research. ASBH Exchange 9:6–7. .
- 2006b. Best laid plans for offering results go awry. Am J Bioeth 6:22–23. .
- 2001. The internal morality of clinical medicine: A paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos 26:559–579. .
- 2013. Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results. Genet Med 15:882–887. , , , , , .
- 2006. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth 6:8–17. , .
- SACGHS—Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society. 2008. U. S. System of Oversight of Genetic Testing: A Response to the Charge of the Secretary of Health and Human Services 128.
- 2012. Reading law: The interpretation of legal texts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West. , .
- 2005. Disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA 294:737–740. , .
- 2005. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: Attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med 5:e91. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed0050091 , .
- 2013. Return of individual research results and incidental findings: Facing the challenges of translational science. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14:557–577. .
- 2008. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36:219–248; 211. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2003. Quick CLIA 101 and CLIA Compliance (slide 3), available at http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/meetings/October2003/Yost.pdf .
- 2003. Ethical considerations for innovations and clinical trials. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:380–385. , .