Review
The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates
Article first published online: 3 JUN 2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1350210304
Copyright © 1990 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kappeler, P. M. (1990), The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. Am. J. Primatol., 21: 201–214. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350210304
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 JUN 2005
- Article first published online: 3 JUN 2005
- Manuscript Revised: 14 MAR 1990
- Manuscript Received: 11 DEC 1989
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- sexual dimorphism;
- evolution;
- phylogeny;
- allometry;
- body size;
- Prosimiae
Abstract
The four major hypotheses advanced to explain the evolution of sexually dimorphic characters invoke sexual selection, natural selection, allometry, and phylogenetic inertia. In this paper, each of these hypotheses is examined for its usefulness in explaining the inter-specific variation in sexual size dimorphism among prosimian primates. Data on body weight and the degree of sexual dimorphism were obtained for 32 prosimian and 95 simian species. Although prosimians exhibited significantly less sexual dimorphism than simians, there was nevertheless significant variation in dimorphism among them. The degree of sexual dimorphism in prosimians did not show significant variance at any taxonomic level, but the majority of variance occurred within genera. Thus, sexual dimorphism in size among prosimians is probably not constrained by phylogeny at the generic level and above. There was no significant correlation between body size and the degree of sexual dimorphism in prosimians, suggesting the absence of an allometric effect. Similarly there was no relationship between body size and sexual dimorphism among simians in this size range. This result suggested that the expression of sexual dimorphism may nevertheless be influenced by absolute size. In prosimians, inter-specific differences in sexual dimorphism were not correlated with variance in male reproductive success. It is suggested that speed and agility of males, rather than size and strength, might have been favored by intra-sexual selection in most prosimians. It seems also plausible that the relative monomorphism of most prosimians, especially in the Lemuriformes, might be a result of increased female size favored by natural selection. Consideration of all natural and sexual selective pressures that affect size in both sexes separately is required to understand the adaptive function and evolution of primate size dimorphism.

1098-2345/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=832cc576d1eddf4ac15e3046b2848a03499cc100)
1098-2345/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=4b5d4907b66d9bb9f51952aad6ff8f378a5440d0)
1098-2345/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b93565ff67cdfeec6fb91a193f06d9644d52b789)