Lecture delivered on 25 March 1969, on the first anniversary of the departure from South Africa of Dr. Raymond Hoffenberg, formerly of the Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town. This was the 1st Raymond Hoffenberg Lecture, delivered under the auspices of the Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town.
Brain-size, grey matter and race —fact or fiction?†
Version of Record online: 28 APR 2005
Copyright © 1970 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume 32, Issue 1, pages 3–25, January 1970
How to Cite
Tobias, P. V. (1970), Brain-size, grey matter and race —fact or fiction?. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 32: 3–25. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330320103
- Issue online: 28 APR 2005
- Version of Record online: 28 APR 2005
A critical review is given of those factors which may be accompanied by variations in brain weight, viz. sex, body size, age of death, nutritional state in early life, source of the sample, occupational group, cause of death, lapse of time after death, temperature after death, anatomical level of severance, presence or absence of cerebrospinal fluid, of meninges, and of blood-vessels. Valid comparisons between the brain-weight of human populations should take all, or several, of these variables into account; however, published studies have not done so, despite claims to the contrary. The ideal sample is from subjects who have died suddenly without prior disease: while three such samples are on record for Europeans, none has been recorded for Negroes. The brain-weight of healthy Negroes is not known. Most published interracial comparisons are invalid. The histological, chemical and functional counterparts of big and small brains in modern man are not known. Published interracial comparisons of thickness of the cerebral cortex and, particularly, of its supragranular layer, are technically invalid: there is no acceptable proof that the cortex of Negroes is thinner in whole, or in any layer, than that of Europeans. It is concluded that vast claims have been based on insubstantial evidence.