Article
Systematics and body size: Implications for feeding adaptations in new world monkeys
Article first published online: 2 MAY 2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880403
Copyright © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ford, S. M. and Davis, L. C. (1992), Systematics and body size: Implications for feeding adaptations in new world monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88: 415–468. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880403
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 MAY 2005
- Article first published online: 2 MAY 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 27 JAN 1992
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUL 1990
Funded by
- Office of Research Development and Administration, Southern Illinois University
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Platyrrhines;
- Body size;
- Systematics;
- Feeding ecology;
- Sexual dimorphism;
- Cope's Law
Abstract
The relationship between body size and feeding ecology is well established for primates. It is argued that the evolutionary history of modern New World monkeys and, in particular, the path to attainment of current body size is significant in understanding the similarities and differences between dietary strategies and other ecological parameters of similar-sized monkeys. Current interpretations of New World monkey evolutionary relationships are reviewed. Based on a synthesis of available body weights and the assumption that the earliest New World monkeys weighed close to 1 kg, similar to modern Aotus and Callicebus, predicted patterns of body size change in each lineage are given. Restrictions on directions of body size change in primates are discussed, and it is shown that “Stanley's Rule” offers a good explanation for differing body size ranges in New and Old World anthropoids. Predicted ecological correlates to body size drawn from the mammalian literature are offered and tested using data on New World monkeys, which show some concurrence and several interesting departures from predicted patterns. Sexual dimorphism in body weight of New World monkey species is reviewed, based on the new summary of body weight data given. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1096-8644/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=33f8ec505be287504f05fadcc3bcee886f62295e)
1096-8644/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=4305dbacc7e375e9300998894487b997b557e791)
1096-8644/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=c25957633aab6b6ac1922fea9d9a5103f0357fec)