Research Article
Relationships between the diet and dentition of Asian leaf monkeys
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22081
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Special Issue: Special symposium issue: Primate Dental Ecology: How Teeth Respond to the Environment
Volume 148, Issue 2, pages 262–275, June 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Wright, B. W. and Willis, M. S. (2012), Relationships between the diet and dentition of Asian leaf monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 148: 262–275. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22081
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 7 FEB 2011
Funded by
- NSF. Grant Number: DBS-9221163
- American Museum of Natural History, Boise Fund, Sigma Xi, The Wenner-Gren Dissertation Field Grant
Keywords:
- Asian colobines;
- incisors;
- molars;
- folivores;
- dental ecology
Abstract
Colobines have been generally described as primates that use the anterior teeth minimally, but the posterior teeth extensively, to process leaves and related food items. However, variation among leaf monkeys in both anterior and posterior dental morphology has been recognized for decades. In this study, we turn to Hylander's (Science 189 (1975) 1095–1098) analysis of anterior incisor row length and Kay's (Adaptations for foraging in nonhuman primates, 1984) examination of relative molar crest length to test hypotheses proposed by them for Asian colobines. We present findings based on data from the largest Asian colobine sample measured to date. Our findings for incisor row length and molar cresting are not amenable to broad generalizations. In those instances when our morphological findings concur with those of Hylander (Science 189 (1975) 1095–1098) and Kay and Hylander (The ecology of arboreal folivores, 1978), the ecological evidence seldom supports the morphological predictions. The disassociation between diet and dental patterns may be a consequence of differential selection by fallback foods, anthropogenic disturbance or climatic shifts limiting preferred diets, or the use of food types as opposed to food mechanical properties for dietary categorization. We also found that in the case of both incisor row length and molar crest length, the patterns for males and females differed markedly. The reasons for these differences may in part be ascribed to the metabolic challenges faced by females and subsequent niche partitioning. We propose integrated analyses of the ingestive and digestive systems of our study taxa to clarify relationships among behavior, dental morphology, and diet in extant and extinct colobines. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:262–275, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1096-8644/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=33f8ec505be287504f05fadcc3bcee886f62295e)
1096-8644/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=4305dbacc7e375e9300998894487b997b557e791)