Get access

Comparative histomorphology of intrinsic vibrissa musculature among primates: implications for the evolution of sensory ecology and “face touch”

Authors

  • Magdalena N. Muchlinski,

    1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Emily L. Durham,

    1. Department of Physical Therapy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Timothy D. Smith,

    1. School of Physical Therapy, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA 16057
    2. Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Anne M. Burrows

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Physical Therapy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282
    2. Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
    • Department of Physical Therapy, 600 Forbes Avenue, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Macrovibrissae are specialized tactile sensory hairs present in most mammalian orders, used in maxillary mechanoreception or “face touch.” Some mammals have highly organized vibrissae and are able to “whisk” them. Movement of vibrissae is influenced by intrinsic vibrissa musculature, striated muscle bands that attach directly to the vibrissa capsule. It is unclear if primates have organized vibrissae or intrinsic vibrissa musculature and it is uncertain if they can move their vibrissae. The present study used histomorphological techniques to compare vibrissae among 19 primates and seven non-primate mammalian taxa. Upper lips of these mammals were sectioned and processed for histochemical analysis. While controlling for phylogenetic effects the following hypotheses were tested: 1) mammals with well-organized vibrissae possess intrinsic vibrissa musculature and 2) intrinsic vibrissa musculature is best developed in nocturnal, arboreal taxa. Our qualitative analyses show that only arboreal, nocturnal prosimians possess intrinsic musculature. Not all taxa that possessed organized vibrissae had intrinsic vibrissa musculature. Phylogenetic comparative analyses revealed a 70% probability that stem mammals, primates, and haplorhines possessed intrinsic vibrissa musculature and well-organized vibrissae. These two traits most likely coevolved according to a discrete phylogenetic analysis. These results indicate that nocturnal, arboreal primates have the potential to more actively use their vibrissae in spatial recognition and navigation tasks than diurnal, more terrestrial species, but there is a clear phylogenetic signal involved in the evolution of primate vibrissae and “face touch.” Am J Phys Anthropol, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary